Significance of mid-radiotherapy 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in esophageal cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Lee, Byung min [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Chang Geol [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ Coll Med, Yonsei Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Uijeongbu St Marys Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Uijeongbu St, Uijongbu, South Korea
关键词
Esophageal cancer; PET; CT; Radiotherapy; Metabolism; METABOLIC TUMOR VOLUME; TOTAL LESION GLYCOLYSIS; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; F-18-FDG PET/CT; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION; FDG PET; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Metabolic parameters evaluated by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) are known as prognostic markers in various cancers. We aimed to validate the predictive value of mid-radiotherapy (RT) FDG PET/CT parameters in esophageal cancer. Materials and methods: Eighty-three patients treated with RT with or without chemotherapy between 2015 and 2020 were included. PET parameters including metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis, and mean (SUVmean) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were analyzed. Locoregional recurrence-free rate (LRFR) and distant metastasis-free rate (DMFR) were analyzed. Results: The median follow-up period was 10.5 months. Mid-RT SUVmax was significantly associated with LRFR (HR 1.07, p = 0.009) and DMFR (HR 1.13, p = 0.047) while mid-RT MTV was associated with DMFR (HR 1.06, p = 0.007). Treatment response after RT was associated with overall survival (HR, 1.52, p = 0.025). Further, treatment response was significantly associated with mid-RT SUVmax. The optimal cutoff value for mid-RT SUVmax in predicting LRFR and DMFR was 11 while cutoff value for mid-RT MTV was 15. The patients with mid-RT SUVmax < 11 showed superior LRFR and DMFR compared to SUVmax > 11 (1-year LRFR; 73.4% vs. 48.4%, p = 0.028, 1-year DMFR; 74.6% vs. 40.7%, p = 0.007). The 1year DMFR was significantly different between patients with mid-RT MTV < 15 and >15 (1-year DMFR; 78.2% vs. 31.9%, p = 0.002). Conclusion: Tumor metabolism changes during RT can be a useful predictive tool for treatment response and recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer. Clinicians may consider early response evaluation with PET during RT for predicting prognosis information about prognosis. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 171 (2022) 114-120
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 120
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Additional benefit of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the staging of oesophageal cancer
    R. S. Gillies
    M. R. Middleton
    N. D. Maynard
    K. M. Bradley
    F. V. Gleeson
    European Radiology, 2011, 21 : 274 - 280
  • [32] Prognostic Evaluation of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Endometrial Cancer A Retrospective Study
    Lund, Annette Aamand
    Vilstrup, Mie Holm
    Jochumsen, Kirsten M.
    Hess, Soren
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 (08) : 1675 - 1684
  • [33] The Clinical Significance of Preoperative 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Predicting Distant Recurrence in Thymoma
    Niikawa, H.
    Watanabe, T.
    Notsuda, H.
    Shibata, S.
    Onodera, K.
    Watanabe, Y.
    Hirama, T.
    Suzuki, T.
    Oishi, H.
    Noda, M.
    Takanami, K.
    Takase, K.
    Okada, Y.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 35 (02) : E153 - E162
  • [34] Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose with positron emission tomography/computed tomography in cardiac masses
    D'Angelo, E. C.
    Paolisso, P.
    Foa, A.
    Bergamaschi, L.
    Magnani, I
    Toniolo, S.
    Donati, F.
    Rinaldi, A.
    Lovato, L.
    Fanti, S.
    Leone, O.
    Rucci, P.
    Pacini, D.
    Galie, N.
    Pizzi, C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 294 - 294
  • [35] Potential and Clinical Significance of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Evaluating Liver Cancer Response to Lenvatinib Treatment
    Yamashige, Daiki
    Kawamura, Yusuke
    Kobayashi, Masahiro
    Shindoh, Junichi
    Kobayashi, Yuta
    Okubo, Satoshi
    Muraishi, Nozomu
    Kajiwara, Akira
    Iritani, Soichi
    Fujiyama, Shunichiro
    Hosaka, Tetsuya
    Saitoh, Satoshi
    Sezaki, Hitomi
    Akuta, Norio
    Suzuki, Fumitaka
    Suzuki, Yoshiyuki
    Ikeda, Kenji
    Arase, Yasuji
    Hashimoto, Masaji
    Kumada, Hiromitsu
    ONCOLOGY, 2021, 99 (03) : 169 - 176
  • [36] The clinical significance of standardized uptake value in breast cancer measured using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography
    Kim, Young-Hwa
    Lee, Jin-A
    Baek, Jong-Min
    Sung, Gi-Young
    Lee, Do-Sang
    Won, Jong-Man
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 36 (08) : 790 - 794
  • [37] The prognostic significance of the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer
    Geredeli, Caglayan
    Artac, Mehmet
    Kocak, Ismail
    Koral, Lokman
    Sakin, Abdullah
    Altinok, Tamer
    Kaya, Bugra
    Karaagac, Mustafa
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 16 (04) : 816 - 821
  • [38] Systematic review of the staging performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer
    van Westreenen, HL
    Westerterp, M
    Bossuyt, PMM
    Pruim, J
    Sloof, GW
    van Lanschot, JJB
    Groen, H
    Plukker, JTM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (18) : 3805 - 3812
  • [39] 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) staging of esophageal cancer
    Jager, P. L.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 37 - 37
  • [40] Clinical Significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Yoshiaki Kita
    Hiroshi Okumura
    Yasuto Uchikado
    Ken Sasaki
    Itaru Omoto
    Masataka Matsumoto
    Tetsuro Setoyama
    Kiyonori Tanoue
    Shinichiro Mori
    Tetsuhiro Owaki
    Sumiya Ishigami
    Shinichi Ueno
    Yoriko Kajiya
    Shoji Natsugoe
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 20 : 1646 - 1652