Significance of mid-radiotherapy 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in esophageal cancer

被引:3
作者
Lee, Byung min [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Chang Geol [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ Coll Med, Yonsei Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Uijeongbu St Marys Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Uijeongbu St, Uijongbu, South Korea
关键词
Esophageal cancer; PET; CT; Radiotherapy; Metabolism; METABOLIC TUMOR VOLUME; TOTAL LESION GLYCOLYSIS; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; F-18-FDG PET/CT; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION; FDG PET; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Metabolic parameters evaluated by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) are known as prognostic markers in various cancers. We aimed to validate the predictive value of mid-radiotherapy (RT) FDG PET/CT parameters in esophageal cancer. Materials and methods: Eighty-three patients treated with RT with or without chemotherapy between 2015 and 2020 were included. PET parameters including metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis, and mean (SUVmean) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were analyzed. Locoregional recurrence-free rate (LRFR) and distant metastasis-free rate (DMFR) were analyzed. Results: The median follow-up period was 10.5 months. Mid-RT SUVmax was significantly associated with LRFR (HR 1.07, p = 0.009) and DMFR (HR 1.13, p = 0.047) while mid-RT MTV was associated with DMFR (HR 1.06, p = 0.007). Treatment response after RT was associated with overall survival (HR, 1.52, p = 0.025). Further, treatment response was significantly associated with mid-RT SUVmax. The optimal cutoff value for mid-RT SUVmax in predicting LRFR and DMFR was 11 while cutoff value for mid-RT MTV was 15. The patients with mid-RT SUVmax < 11 showed superior LRFR and DMFR compared to SUVmax > 11 (1-year LRFR; 73.4% vs. 48.4%, p = 0.028, 1-year DMFR; 74.6% vs. 40.7%, p = 0.007). The 1year DMFR was significantly different between patients with mid-RT MTV < 15 and >15 (1-year DMFR; 78.2% vs. 31.9%, p = 0.002). Conclusion: Tumor metabolism changes during RT can be a useful predictive tool for treatment response and recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer. Clinicians may consider early response evaluation with PET during RT for predicting prognosis information about prognosis. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 171 (2022) 114-120
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 120
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Boellaard R, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P1519
  • [2] Prognostic Value of Pretherapeutic Tumor-to-Blood Standardized Uptake Ratio in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma
    Buetof, Rebecca
    Hofheinz, Frank
    Zoephel, Klaus
    Stadelmann, Tobias
    Schmollack, Julia
    Jentsch, Christina
    Loeck, Steffen
    Kotzerke, Joerg
    Baumann, Michael
    van den Hoff, Joerg
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (08) : 1150 - 1156
  • [3] Prognostic Value of Preoperative Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Chung, Hyun Hoon
    Kwon, Hyun Woo
    Kang, Keon Wook
    Park, Noh-Hyun
    Song, Yong-Sang
    Chung, June-Key
    Kang, Soon-Beom
    Kim, Jae Weon
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (06) : 1966 - 1972
  • [4] Whole body 18FDG-PET and the response of esophageal cancer to induction therapy:: Results of a prospective trial
    Downey, RJ
    Akhurst, T
    Ilson, D
    Ginsberg, R
    Bains, MS
    Gonen, M
    Koong, H
    Gollub, M
    Minsky, BD
    Zakowski, M
    Turnbull, A
    Larson, SM
    Rusch, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (03) : 428 - 432
  • [5] Medical progress - Esophageal cancer
    Enzinger, PC
    Mayer, RJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (23) : 2241 - 2252
  • [6] Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma
    Flamen, P
    Lerut, A
    Van Cutsem, E
    De Wever, W
    Peeters, M
    Stroobants, S
    Dupont, P
    Bormans, G
    Hiele, M
    De Leyn, P
    Van Raemdonck, D
    Coosemans, W
    Ectors, N
    Haustermans, K
    Mortelmans, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (18) : 3202 - 3210
  • [7] Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Gebski, Val
    Burmeister, Bryan
    Smithers, B. Mark
    Foo, Kerwyn
    Zalcberg, John
    Simes, John
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (03) : 226 - 234
  • [8] Current status of PET/CT for tumour volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    Greco, Carlo
    Rosenzweig, Kenneth
    Cascini, Giuseppe Lucio
    Tamburrini, Oscar
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2007, 57 (02) : 125 - 134
  • [9] Hautzel H, 1997, J NUCL MED, V38, P1384
  • [10] Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis on Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Very Early and Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Hwang, Sang Hyun
    Lee, Jeong Won
    Cho, Ho Jin
    Kim, Kyung Sik
    Choi, Gi Hong
    Yun, Mijin
    [J]. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 42 (01) : 34 - 39