Measurement and monitoring of safety: impact and challenges of putting a conceptual framework into practice

被引:16
作者
Chatburn, Eleanor [1 ]
Macrae, Carl [1 ]
Carthey, Jane [2 ]
Vincent, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
[2] Jane Carthey Consulting, London, England
关键词
HEALTH-CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; SURVEILLANCE; TIME;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007175
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Measurement and Monitoring of Safety Framework provides a conceptual model to guide organisations in assessing safety. The Health Foundation funded a large-scale programme to assess the value and impact of applying the Framework in regional and frontline care settings. We explored the experiences and reflections of key participants in the programme. Methods The study was conducted in the nine healthcare organisations in England and Scotland testing the Framework (three regional improvement bodies, six frontline settings). Post hoc interviews with clinical and managerial staff were analysed using template analysis. Findings Participants reported that the Framework promoted a substantial shift in their thinking about how safety is actively managed in their environment. It provided a common language, facilitated a more inquisitive approach and encouraged a more holistic view of the components of safety. These changes in conceptual understanding, however, did not always translate into broader changes in practice, with many sites only addressing some aspects of the Framework. One of the three regions did embrace the Framework in its entirety and achieved wider impact with a range of interventions. This region had committed leaders who took time to fully understand the concepts, who maintained a flexible approach to exploring the utility of the Framework and who worked with frontline staff to translate the concepts for local settings. Conclusions The Measuring and Monitoring of Safety Framework has the potential to support a broader and richer approach to organisational safety. Such a conceptually based initiative requires both committed leaders who themselves understand the concepts and more time to establish understanding and aims than might be needed in a standard improvement programme.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 826
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PATIENT SAFETY
[3]   Changes in adverse event rates in hospitals over time: a longitudinal retrospective patient record review study [J].
Baines, Rebecca J. ;
Langelaan, Maaike ;
de Bruijne, Martine C. ;
Asscheman, Henk ;
Spreeuwenberg, Peter ;
van de Steeg, Lotte ;
Siemerink, Kitty M. ;
van Rosse, Floor ;
Broekens, Maren ;
Wagner, Cordula .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 (04) :290-298
[4]   Multiple component patient safety intervention in English hospitals: controlled evaluation of second phase [J].
Benning, Amirta ;
Dixon-Woods, Mary ;
Nwulu, Ugochi ;
Ghaleb, Maisoon ;
Dawson, Jeremy ;
Barber, Nick ;
Franklin, Bryony Dean ;
Girling, Alan ;
Hemming, Karla ;
Carmalt, Martin ;
Rudge, Gavin ;
Naicker, Thirumalai ;
Kotecha, Amit ;
Derrington, M. Clare ;
Lilford, Richard .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342 :370
[5]   Resilient health care: turning patient safety on its head [J].
Braithwaite, Jeffrey ;
Wears, Robert L. ;
Hollnagel, Erik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2015, 27 (05) :418-420
[6]  
Canadian Patient Safety Institute, INTR MEAS MON SAF VI
[7]   Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science [J].
Damschroder, Laura J. ;
Aron, David C. ;
Keith, Rosalind E. ;
Kirsh, Susan R. ;
Alexander, Jeffery A. ;
Lowery, Julie C. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4
[8]   Implementation of the trigger review method in Scottish general practices: patient safety outcomes and potential for quality improvement [J].
de Wet, Carl ;
Black, Chris ;
Luty, Sarah ;
Mckay, John ;
O'Donnell, Catherine A. ;
Bowie, Paul .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2017, 26 (04) :335-342
[9]  
Dixon-Woods Mary, 2016, Future Hosp J, V3, P191, DOI 10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-191
[10]   Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation's programme evaluations and relevant literature [J].
Dixon-Woods, Mary ;
McNicol, Sarah ;
Martin, Graham .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2012, 21 (10) :876-884