A Lean Approach for Multi-criteria Decision-Making in Public Services' Strategy Deployment

被引:1
作者
Santhiapillai, F. P. [1 ]
Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger UIS, Dept Mech & Struct Engn & Mat Sci, Stavanger, Norway
来源
ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT PRODUCTION SYSTEMS, APMS 2021, PT I | 2021年 / 630卷
关键词
Public services; Lean; Multi-criteria decision-making; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-85874-2_71
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The public services' related strategy deployment (SD) process involves complex and multi-criteria decision-making. Group decision-making is often characterized by, among other things, some degree of managerial discretion, silo thinking, poor consensus and ad hoc approaches, for simplification purposes. This reduces consistency and results in a high level of variability in the overall performance, due to ambiguous and flawed translation into operational targets. Hence, it is necessary to investigate the potential use of scientific approaches to improve the consistency and minimize the variability of the performance of organizations providing public services. This paper presents the use of a Lean approach, by incorporating Gemba Walks, A3 and the analytic hierarchy process, to improve consistency and minimize the variability of an SD-related decision-making process in a public organization. Action research, supplemented by a practical case exercise, is performed, using qualitative and quantitative data, in one Norwegian police district. The proposed methodology provides a structured approach to consolidating different managerial perspectives, to systematically prioritize strategic alternatives and directions in a more meticulous and credible way, decreasing the possibility of minority domination and subjective views. The suggested approach can help build consensus and improve the consistency associated with group decision-making and minimize the adverse consequences of an ineffective SD process.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 664
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Using Toyota's A3 Thinking for Analyzing MBA Business Cases
    Anderson, Joe S.
    Morgan, James N.
    Williams, Susan K.
    [J]. DECISION SCIENCES-JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE EDUCATION, 2011, 9 (02) : 275 - 285
  • [2] Resource Allocation and Priority Setting in Health Care: A Multi-criteria Decision Analysis Problem of Value?
    Angelis, Aris
    Kanavos, Panos
    Montibeller, Gilberto
    [J]. GLOBAL POLICY, 2017, 8 : 76 - 83
  • [3] Asadabadi Mehdi Rajabi, 2019, Cogent Engineering, V6, DOI 10.1080/23311916.2019.1623153
  • [4] Balle M., 2019, LEAN SENSEI
  • [5] A technological, organisational, and environmental analysis of decision making methodologies and satisfaction in the context of IT induced business transformations
    Bernroider, Edward W. N.
    Schmoellerl, Patrick
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 224 (01) : 141 - 153
  • [6] Bryman A., 2011, Reliability and validity in qualitative research
  • [7] A group MCDA method for aiding decision-making of complex problems in public sector: The case of Belo Monte Dam
    Cuoghi, Kaio Guilherme
    Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua
    [J]. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2019, 68
  • [8] DFO, 2020, EV NAERP STAT 2019, P1
  • [9] Glomseth R, 2020, TOPPLEDERE TOPPLEDEL, P1
  • [10] Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    Siraj, Sajid
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 264 (02) : 462 - 471