COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SSIM INDEX AND THE PEARSON COEFFICIENT AS A CRITERION FOR IMAGE SIMILARITY

被引:27
|
作者
Starovoitov, V. V. [1 ]
Eldarova, E. E. [2 ]
Iskakov, K. T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Acad Sci Belarus, State Sci Inst, United Inst Informat Problems, Minsk, BELARUS
[2] LN Gumilyov Eurasian Natl Univ, Nur Sultan, Kazakhstan
来源
EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS | 2020年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
Image similarity; Image quality; SSIM index; MOS; Metric; Pearson correlation; STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY; QUALITY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.32523/2306-6172-2020-8-1-76-90
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
In this paper,the SSIM index, which is the most popular measure of the structural image is studied. A mathematical proof that the SSIM index and its linear transformations are not metric functions is given. We demonstrated that this index, as well as any full-reference image comparison function, cannot evaluate the image quality. These functions estimate only some similarity degree between a reference image and its distorted copy. It is proved experimentally that the SSIM index does not always correctly determine similarity of images of the same scene. The Pearson linear correlation is a better tool for similarity analysis and it is faster to calculate. It is experimentally demonstrated that the Pearson correlation better than the SSIM index coincides with the subjective MOS image estimates. It is shown that the Pearson correlation coefficient is non-linearly related to the Euclid metric, but no any linear transformation of the coefficient can be a metric function. Our study proves that the Pearson correlation coefficient is superior to the SSIM index when evaluating image similarity.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 90
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of Image Similarity Using CNN and ANNOY
    Hong, Jun-Ki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE INNOVATION, 2022, 10 (02)
  • [22] Image Similarity Metrics Suitable for Infrared Video Stabilization during Active Wildfire Monitoring: A Comparative Analysis
    Valero, Mario M.
    Verstockt, Steven
    Mata, Christian
    Jimenez, Dan
    Queen, Lloyd
    Rios, Oriol
    Pastor, Elsa
    Planas, Eulalia
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [23] Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index
    Xue, Wufeng
    Zhang, Lei
    Mou, Xuanqin
    Bovik, Alan C.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2014, 23 (02) : 684 - 695
  • [24] Monogenic signal theory based feature similarity index for image quality assessment
    Luo, Xue-Gang
    Wang, Hua-Jun
    Wang, Sen
    AEU-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 69 (01) : 75 - 81
  • [25] A Haar wavelet-based perceptual similarity index for image quality assessment
    Reisenhofer, Rafael
    Bosse, Sebastian
    Kutyniok, Gitta
    Wiegand, Thomas
    SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION, 2018, 61 : 33 - 43
  • [26] Enhanced image similarity analysis system in digital pathology
    Jae-Gu Lee
    Kyung-Chan Choi
    Seung-Ho Yeon
    Jeong Won Kim
    Young-Woong Ko
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2017, 76 : 25477 - 25494
  • [27] Enhanced image similarity analysis system in digital pathology
    Lee, Jae-Gu
    Choi, Kyung-Chan
    Yeon, Seung-Ho
    Kim, Jeong Won
    Ko, Young-Woong
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2017, 76 (23) : 25477 - 25494
  • [28] IQM2: new image quality measure based on steerable pyramid wavelet transform and structural similarity index
    E. Dumic
    S. Grgic
    M. Grgic
    Signal, Image and Video Processing, 2014, 8 : 1159 - 1168
  • [29] IQM2: new image quality measure based on steerable pyramid wavelet transform and structural similarity index
    Dumic, E.
    Grgic, S.
    Grgic, M.
    SIGNAL IMAGE AND VIDEO PROCESSING, 2014, 8 (06) : 1159 - 1168
  • [30] Principal Component Analysis Using Structural Similarity Index for Images
    Ghojogh, Benyamin
    Karray, Fakhri
    Crowley, Mark
    IMAGE ANALYSIS AND RECOGNITION, ICIAR 2019, PT I, 2019, 11662 : 77 - 88