COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SSIM INDEX AND THE PEARSON COEFFICIENT AS A CRITERION FOR IMAGE SIMILARITY

被引:27
|
作者
Starovoitov, V. V. [1 ]
Eldarova, E. E. [2 ]
Iskakov, K. T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Acad Sci Belarus, State Sci Inst, United Inst Informat Problems, Minsk, BELARUS
[2] LN Gumilyov Eurasian Natl Univ, Nur Sultan, Kazakhstan
来源
EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS | 2020年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
Image similarity; Image quality; SSIM index; MOS; Metric; Pearson correlation; STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY; QUALITY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.32523/2306-6172-2020-8-1-76-90
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
In this paper,the SSIM index, which is the most popular measure of the structural image is studied. A mathematical proof that the SSIM index and its linear transformations are not metric functions is given. We demonstrated that this index, as well as any full-reference image comparison function, cannot evaluate the image quality. These functions estimate only some similarity degree between a reference image and its distorted copy. It is proved experimentally that the SSIM index does not always correctly determine similarity of images of the same scene. The Pearson linear correlation is a better tool for similarity analysis and it is faster to calculate. It is experimentally demonstrated that the Pearson correlation better than the SSIM index coincides with the subjective MOS image estimates. It is shown that the Pearson correlation coefficient is non-linearly related to the Euclid metric, but no any linear transformation of the coefficient can be a metric function. Our study proves that the Pearson correlation coefficient is superior to the SSIM index when evaluating image similarity.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 90
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combined image similarity index
    Okarma, Krzysztof
    OPTICAL REVIEW, 2012, 19 (05) : 349 - 354
  • [2] Structural similarity index (SSIM) revisited: A data-driven approach
    Bakurov, Illya
    Buzzelli, Marco
    Schettini, Raimondo
    Castelli, Mauro
    Vanneschi, Leonardo
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 189
  • [3] IMPROVEMENT OF PEARSON SIMILARITY COEFFICIENT BASED ON ITEM FREQUENCY
    Zhang, Fie
    Zhou, Weitao
    Sun, Lili
    Lin, Xiaochuan
    Liu, Hongjie
    He, Zhimin
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WAVELET ANALYSIS AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (ICWAPR), 2017, : 248 - 253
  • [4] Combined image similarity index
    Krzysztof Okarma
    Optical Review, 2012, 19 : 349 - 354
  • [5] Rate bounds on SSIM index of quantized image DCT coefficients
    Channappayya, Sumohana S.
    Bovik, Alan C.
    Heath, Robert W., Jr.
    Caramanis, Constantine
    DCC: 2008 DATA COMPRESSION CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 352 - 361
  • [6] Prospects of Structural Similarity Index for Medical Image Analysis
    Mudeng, Vicky
    Kim, Minseok
    Choe, Se-woon
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [7] Analysis of Industrial Product Sound by Applying Image Similarity Measures
    Ciric, Dejan G.
    Peric, Zoran H.
    Vucic, Nikola J.
    Miletic, Miljan P.
    MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (03)
  • [8] Image Structure Subspace Learning Using Structural Similarity Index
    Ghojogh, Benyamin
    Karray, Fakhri
    Crowley, Mark
    IMAGE ANALYSIS AND RECOGNITION, ICIAR 2019, PT I, 2019, 11662 : 33 - 44
  • [9] Complex Wavelet Structural Similarity: A New Image Similarity Index
    Sampat, Mehul P.
    Wang, Zhou
    Gupta, Shalini
    Bovik, Alan Conrad
    Markey, Mia K.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2009, 18 (11) : 2385 - 2401
  • [10] Evaluating Similarity of Spectrogram-like Images of DC Motor Sounds by Pearson Correlation Coefficient
    Ciric, Dejan G.
    Peric, Zoran H.
    Milenkovic, Marko
    Vucic, Nikola J.
    ELEKTRONIKA IR ELEKTROTECHNIKA, 2022, 28 (03) : 37 - 44