In-plane cyclic behavior of structural insulated panel wood walls including slit steel connectors

被引:3
|
作者
Purasinghe, Rupa [1 ]
Dusicka, Peter [2 ]
Garth, John S. [2 ]
Dedek, Gennelle [1 ]
Lum, Howard [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Los Angeles, Dept Civil Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
[2] Portland State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Portland, OR 97207 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Structural Insulated Panels; Cyclic loading; Slit steel connectors; Block spline; Plastic deformation; Ductility; Drift capacity; Backbone curves; Pull out of nails; Hold downs;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.027
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The objective of this paper was to experimentally investigate the behavior of structural insulated panel (SIP) walls under in-plane cyclic loading and to test several panel-to-panel connections in order to measure their effect on the behavior of the walls. Each wall was constructed using two SIP panels with one top plate, one sill plate, two end plates, and a panel-to-panel connection. Each SIP panel had a 5.5 in. (14 cm) thick expanded polystyrene core sandwiched between two 4' x 8' (1.22 m x 2.44 m) sheets of 7/16 '' (1.11 cm) oriented strand board. The top sill plates were split up between each panel in an effort to increase the potential for racking behavior of the walls and, therefore, the relative vertical displacement between the panels. In addition, as a preliminary study, three different steel connector configurations utilizing 26 gauge steel shear panels were considered in an effort to introduce additional ductility compared to more traditional block spline connection. From experimental observation of the wall with the block spline connection and the wall with no connection, the panel-to-panel connection was shown to contribute significant strength and stiffness to the wall system. The walls that were constructed with the first two configurations of the shear panels did not show any significant increase in either stiffness or ductility over the wall with the block spline. These walls also showed a decline in peak strength, which occurred at lower lateral displacements than the peak strength of the typical wall. For both of these cases, the shear panels yielded early and ruptured at the lateral deformation which caused peak load in each wall. The SIP wall implementing the third style of shear panel also did not demonstrate a significant increase in ductility as compared to the standard SIP wall. Despite the initially outlined potential, the preliminary study of implementation of the slit steel shear panels considered in this study did not significantly alter the performance of the conventionally connected SIP walls. Further study with stiff connectors capable of significant ductility prior to fracture would need to be implemented to realize the benefits of increased wall ductility.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 197
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of Insulation Type on In-plane Shear Behavior of Insulated Concrete Sandwich Panels (ICSP) with GFRP Grid Shear Connectors
    Kim, Hye Ran
    Kang, Dae Hyun
    Yun, Hyun Do
    Development of Industrial Manufacturing, 2014, 525 : 416 - 419
  • [22] Seismic behavior of double steel plates and concrete filled composite shear walls subject to in-plane cyclic load: Experimental investigation
    Li, Xiaohu
    Luo, Hao
    Ren, Xihao
    Zhang, Tao
    Li, Lei
    Shi, Ke
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2024, 90 (04) : 345 - 356
  • [23] Seismic Behavior of Brick Masonry Walls Representative of Ancient Chinese Pagoda Walls Subjected to In-plane Cyclic Loading
    Xie, Qifang
    Xu, Dunfeng
    Wang, Yuezhong
    Zhang, Lipeng
    Xin, Ren
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2021, 15 (09) : 1336 - 1348
  • [24] Hysteretic model for steel-concrete composite shear walls subjected to in-plane cyclic loading
    Zhao, Weiyi
    Guo, Quanquan
    Huang, Zeyu
    Tan, Li
    Chen, Jun
    Ye, Yinghua
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2016, 106 : 461 - 470
  • [25] In-plane cyclic performance of adobe walls retrofitted with near-surface-mounted steel rebars
    Banadaki, Hosein Mirabi
    Morshed, Reza
    Eslami, Abolfazl
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 194 : 106 - 119
  • [26] Numerical assessment of In-plane behavior of multi-panel CLT shear walls for modular structures
    Bhandari, Sujit
    Fischer, Erica C.
    Riggio, Mariapaola
    Muszynski, Lech
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 295
  • [27] Seismic in-plane behavior of composite masonry walls strengthened with cold rolled steel sheets
    Haghighi, Mohammad Amin
    Epackachi, Siamak
    Dolatshahi, Kiarash M.
    STRUCTURES, 2024, 69
  • [28] In-Plane Seismic Behavior of Brick Masonry Walls Reinforced with Twisted Steel Bars and Conventional Steel Bars
    Demaj, Armando
    Gago, Antonio Sousa
    Marques, Ana Isabel
    Ferreira, Joao Gomes
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [29] Steel-plate composite (SC) walls: In-plane shear behavior, database, and design
    Seo, Jungil
    Varma, Amit H.
    Sener, Kadir
    Ayhan, Deniz
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2016, 119 : 202 - 215
  • [30] In-plane cyclic behavior of brick walls strengthened with CFRP plates embedded in the horizontal mortar joint
    Jing, Jiejing
    Zhou, Changdong
    Zhang, Chen
    Li, Tian
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 63