A randomised controlled trial of oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine before computerised tomography in children

被引:42
作者
Yuen, V. M. [1 ,5 ]
Li, B. L. [2 ,3 ]
Cheuk, D. K. [4 ]
Leung, M. K. M.
Hui, T. W. C. [5 ]
Wong, I. C. [7 ]
Lam, W. W. [6 ]
Choi, S. W. [8 ]
Irwin, M. G. [8 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Childrens Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Women & Childrens Med Ctr, Dept Anaesthesiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Med Univ, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[7] UCL Sch Pharm, London, England
[8] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Anaesthesiol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
chloral hydrate; dexmedetomidine; intranasal; paediatric; sedation; tomography; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; SEDATION; PREMEDICATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PHARMACOKINETICS; CT;
D O I
10.1111/anae.13981
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Chloral hydrate is commonly used to sedate children for painless procedures. Children may recover more quickly after sedation with dexmedetomidine, which has a shorter half-life. We randomly allocated 196 children to chloral hydrate syrup 50 mg.kg(-1) and intranasal saline spray, or placebo syrup and intranasal dexmedetomidine spray 3 g.kg(-1), 30 min before computerised tomography studies. More children resisted or cried after drinking chloral hydrate syrup than placebo syrup, 72 of 107 (67%) vs. 42 of 87 (48%), p = 0.009, but there was no difference after intranasal saline vs. dexmedetomidine, 49 of 107 (46%) vs. 40 of 87 (46%), p = 0.98. Sedation was satisfactory in 81 of 107 (76%) children after chloral hydrate and 64 of 87 (74%) children after dexmedetomidine, p = 0.74. Of the 173 children followed up for at least 4 h after discharge, 38 of 97 (39%) had recovered normal function after chloral hydrate and 32 of 76 (42%) after dexmedetomidine, p = 0.76. Six children vomited after chloral hydrate syrup and placebo spray vs. none after placebo syrup and dexmedetomidine spray, p = 0.03.
引用
收藏
页码:1191 / 1195
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication in children with recent upper respiratory tract infection undergoing interventional cardiac catheterisation A randomised controlled trial
    Zhang, Sen
    Zhang, Ruidong
    Cai, Meihua
    Zhang, Kan
    Zhang, Mazhong
    Zheng, Jijian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 37 (02) : 85 - 90
  • [32] Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine alone and dexmedetomidine-chloral hydrate combination sedation for electroencephalography in children: A large retrospective cohort study and propensity score-matched analysis
    Wang, Liang
    Wang, Hezhi
    Tang, Wen
    Tang, Linlin
    Xu, Ying
    Xiong, Ling
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (11)
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral chloral hydrate as sedatives for pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jun
    Li, Yong
    Xiao, Shuna
    Shi, Buyun
    Xia, Zhi
    Huang, Chengjiao
    Xu, Hui
    Li, Na
    Tang, Wen
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 70 (05) : 1219 - 1224
  • [34] Efficacy of Rectal Versus Oral Chloral Hydrate in Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Response: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Siripermpool, Chutaporn
    Pattrakornkul, Nalinee
    Thongsattra, Thanitda
    Jianbunjongkit, Narit
    OTO OPEN, 2024, 8 (04)
  • [35] Differences in efficacy and safety of midazolam vs. dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
    Zhou, Wen-Jun
    Liu, Mei
    Fan, Xue-Peng
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2021, 21 (02)
  • [36] Combined use of intranasal Dexmedetomidine and an oral novel formulation of Midazolam for sedation of young children during brain MRI examination: a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial
    Gu, Hongbin
    Miao, Liyan
    Bai, Jie
    Lu, Guolin
    Lei, Qian
    Yang, Lijun
    Wang, Denggui
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [37] Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Midazolam Versus Chloral Hydrate as Sedation for Quality Computed Tomography Imaging in Children
    Heydari, Farhad
    Shabani, Hamid
    Majidinejad, Saeed
    Nasr-esfahani, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2019, 6 (04) : 286 - 291
  • [38] Randomised double-blind clinical trial of intermediate- versus high-dose chloral hydrate for neuroimaging of children
    MartiBonmati, L
    RoncheraOms, CL
    Casillas, C
    Poyatos, C
    Torrijo, C
    Jimenez, NV
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 1995, 37 (08) : 687 - 691
  • [39] Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral chloral hydrate for diagnostic procedures sedation in infants and toddlers A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Linji
    Zhou, Jiaojiao
    Yu, Deshui
    Hao, Xuechao
    Xie, Ying
    Zhu, Tao
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (09)
  • [40] Oral trans-mucosal dexmedetomidine for controlling of emergence agitation in children undergoing tonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trial
    Abdel-Ghaffar, Hala S.
    Abdel-Wahab, Amani H.
    Roushdy, Mohammed M.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2019, 69 (05): : 469 - 476