Development of Population Tariffs for the ICECAP-A Instrument for Hungary and their Comparison With the UK Tariffs

被引:8
作者
Farkas, Miklos [1 ]
Huynh, Elisabeth [2 ]
Gulacsi, Laszlo [3 ,5 ]
Zrubka, Zsombor [3 ,5 ]
Dobos, Agota [6 ]
Kovacs, Levente [4 ]
Baji, Petra [7 ]
Pentek, Marta [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Accounting & Finance, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Populat Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, Acton, Australia
[3] Obuda Univ, Univ Res & Innovat Ctr, Hlth Econ Res Ctr, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Obuda Univ, Univ Res & Innovat Ctr, Physiol Controls Res Ctr, Budapest, Hungary
[5] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Corvinus Inst Adv Studies, Budapest, Hungary
[6] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Corvinus Ctr Foreign Language Educ & Res, Budapest, Hungary
[7] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Dept Hlth Econ, 8 Fovam Ter, H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
best-worst scaling; EQ-5D-5L; Hungary; ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults; population tariffs; preferences; value set; ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS; CAPABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2021.06.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: The ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults (ICECAP-A) was developed to assess the capability well-being of adults for use in economic evaluations. Currently, ICECAP-A tariffs are available only for the UK population. The objectives of this study were to develop a Hungarian tariff set for the ICECAP-A instrument and to explore intercountry differences between the Hungarian and the UK value sets. Methods: A survey was conducted by computer-assisted personal interviews on a sample representative of the Hungarian adult population (N = 1000) to elicit their preferences regarding ICECAP-A attributes with the use of a best-worst scaling choice task. A latent class multinomial logit model with continuous variance scale was used to estimate the weights for each of the 4 capability levels of all 5 ICECAP-A attributes, namely, attachment, stability, achievement, enjoyment, and autonomy. Results: The model identified 2 preference classes with approximately equal share. The first class had a stronger relative preference for autonomy and achievement, whereas the second class had a strong preference for attachment. Multivariate analysis of the classes revealed that women, pensioners, people who are married or living in a partnership, and people with poorer health status are characteristics associated with the latter class membership (preference for attachment). Population tariffs were estimated from the model. Overall, attachment was found to be the most important attribute, followed by stability, enjoyment, achievement, and autonomy. Conclusions: Hungarian tariffs are largely consistent with those found for the United Kingdom; nevertheless, autonomy seems to be less important in Hungary compared with the United Kingdom.
引用
收藏
页码:1845 / 1852
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A [J].
Al-Janabi, Hareth ;
Flynn, Terry N. ;
Coast, Joanna .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 21 (01) :167-176
[2]   Capability of well-being: validation of the Hungarian version of the ICECAP-A and ICECAP-O questionnaires and population normative data [J].
Baji, Petra ;
Farkas, Miklos ;
Dobos, Agota ;
Zrubka, Zsombor ;
Gulacsi, Laszlo ;
Brodszky, Valentin ;
Rencz, Fanni ;
Pentek, Marta .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (10) :2863-2874
[3]   Development of Population Tariffs for the CarerQol Instrument for Hungary, Poland and Slovenia: A Discrete Choice Experiment Study to Measure the Burden of Informal Caregiving [J].
Baji, Petra ;
Farkas, Miklos ;
Golicki, Dominik ;
Rupel, Valentina ;
Hoefman, Renske ;
Brouwer, Werner B. F. ;
van Exel, Job ;
Zrubka, Zsombor ;
Gulacsi, Laszlo ;
Pentek, Marta .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2020, 38 (06) :633-643
[4]  
Bierlaire M, 200605 TRANSPOR
[5]   Portable electronic vision enhancement systems in comparison with optical magnifiers for near vision activities: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized crossover trial [J].
Bray, Nathan ;
Brand, Andrew ;
Taylor, John ;
Hoare, Zoe ;
Dickinson, Christine ;
Edwards, Rhiannon T. .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2017, 95 (05) :E415-E423
[6]  
EVS, 2011, 19812008EVS19812008
[7]   Best-worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it [J].
Flynn, Terry N. ;
Louviere, Jordan J. ;
Peters, Tim J. ;
Coast, Joanna .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2007, 26 (01) :171-189
[8]   SCORING THE ICECAP-A CAPABILITY INSTRUMENT. ESTIMATION OF A UK GENERAL POPULATION TARIFF [J].
Flynn, Terry N. ;
Huynh, Elisabeth ;
Peters, Tim J. ;
Al-Janabi, Hareth ;
Clemens, Sam ;
Moody, Alison ;
Coast, Joanna .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 24 (03) :258-269
[9]   Maximizing Health or Sufficient Capability in Economic Evaluation? A Methodological Experiment of Treatment for Drug Addiction [J].
Goranitis, Ilias ;
Coast, Joanna ;
Day, Ed ;
Copello, Alex ;
Freemantle, Nick ;
Frew, Emma .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2017, 37 (05) :498-511
[10]   Capability instruments in economic evaluations of health-related interventions: a comparative review of the literature [J].
Helter, Timea Mariann ;
Coast, Joanna ;
Laszewska, Agata ;
Stamm, Tanja ;
Simon, Judit .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (06) :1433-1464