Influence of force location in orthodontic shear bond strength testing

被引:40
作者
Klocke, A [1 ]
Kahl-Nieke, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Orthodont, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
bond strength testing; orthodontic; force location; distance; in vitro; adhesion;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.004
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the influence of debonding force Location in shear bond strength testing of orthodontic brackets in vitro. Methods. Ninety extracted permanent bovine mandibular incisors were randomly divided into 3 groups of 30 specimens each. Teeth were bonded with stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Enamel surfaces were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 30 s and bonded with a composite adhesive. Debonding force measurements were performed with a universal testing machine. Location of the debonding force was: bracket base (group A), ligature groove (group B), occlusal bracket wings (group C). Results. Mean shear bond strength measurements were as follows: 22.70(4.23) MPa (group A), 11.52(2.74) MPa (group B), 9.44(2.96) MPa (group C). Analysis of variance indicated that there were significant differences in shear bond strength. Post-hoc Tukey tests showed that bond strength measurements of group A were significantly different from those of groups B and C. The adhesive remnant index also showed significant differences and ranged from a mean of 1.53 in group A to a mean of 2.10 in group C. Significance. Debonding force Location had a significant influence on shear bond strength measurements and bond failure pattern, indicating that this parameter needs to be taken into consideration for interstudy comparison of in vitro results. (c) 2004 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 396
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH CRYSTAL-GROWTH CONDITIONING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO ACID-ETCH ENAMEL PRETREATMENT [J].
ARTUN, J ;
BERGLAND, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1984, 85 (04) :333-340
[2]   SIGNIFICANCE TESTS .3. [J].
BULMAN, JS ;
OSBORN, JF .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1989, 166 (07) :261-264
[3]   The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols [J].
Eliades, T ;
Brantley, WA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2000, 22 (01) :13-23
[4]   INFLUENCE OF SELECTED VARIABLES ON ADHESION TESTING [J].
FOWLER, CS ;
SWARTZ, ML ;
MOORE, BK ;
RHODES, BF .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1992, 8 (04) :265-269
[5]  
Fox N A, 1994, Br J Orthod, V21, P33
[6]  
GAFFEY PG, 1995, ANGLE ORTHOD, V65, P351
[7]   A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets [J].
Katona, TR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1997, 112 (03) :244-251
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF LOAD LOCATION AND MISALIGNMENT ON SHEAR PEEL TESTING OF DIRECT-BONDED ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS - A FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL [J].
KATONA, TR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1994, 106 (04) :395-402
[9]  
Littlewood S J, 2001, J Orthod, V28, P301, DOI 10.1093/ortho/28.4.301
[10]   Use of jigs to standardise orthodontic bond testing [J].
Littlewood, SJ ;
Redhead, A .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1998, 26 (5-6) :539-545