Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer

被引:46
作者
Gregory, Tess A. [1 ,2 ]
Wilson, Carlene [2 ,3 ]
Duncan, Amy [1 ]
Turnbull, Deborah [1 ]
Cole, Stephen R. [2 ,4 ]
Young, Graeme [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Flinders Ctr Canc Prevent & Control, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
[3] CSIRO, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[4] Repatriat Gen Hosp, Bowel Hlth Serv, Daw Pk 5041, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
PRIMARY-CARE; ADHERENCE; STAGE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-11-38
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Previous research points to differences between predictors of intention to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC) and screening behavior, and suggests social ecological factors may influence screening behavior. The aim of this study was to compare the social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention to screen with predictors of participation. Methods: People aged 50 to 74 years recruited from the electoral roll completed a baseline survey (n = 376) and were subsequently invited to complete an immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT). Results: Multivariate analyses revealed five predictors of intention to screen and two predictors of participation. Perceived barriers to CRC screening and perceived benefits of CRC screening were the only predictor of both outcomes. There was little support for social ecological factors, but measurement problems may have impacted this finding. Conclusions: This study has confirmed that the predictors of intention to screen for CRC and screening behaviour, although overlapping, are not the same. Research should focus predominantly on those factors shown to predict participation. Perceptions about the barriers to screening and benefits of screening are key predictors of participation, and provide a focus for intervention programs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: monitoring report 2018
[2]  
[Anonymous], TXB GASTROENTEROLOGY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, INF PAP INTR SOC IND
[4]   Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2000, 15 (02) :173-189
[5]  
*AUSTR BUR STAT, 2008, AUSTR DEM STAT
[6]   Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening [J].
Brenes, GA ;
Paskett, ED .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 31 (04) :410-416
[7]  
COLE S, INT J BEHAV MED
[8]   Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner [J].
Cole, SR ;
Young, GP ;
Byrne, D ;
Guy, JR ;
Morcom, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2002, 9 (04) :147-152
[9]   Demographic associations with stage of readiness to screen for colorectal cancer [J].
Duncan, Amy ;
Wilson, Carlene ;
Cole, Stephen R. ;
Mikocka-Walus, Antonina ;
Turnbull, Deborah ;
Young, Graeme P. .
HEALTH PROMOTION JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2009, 20 (01) :7-12
[10]  
Emmons KarenM., 2000, Social Epidemiology, P242, DOI [10.1093/oso/9780195083316.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780195083316.001.0001]