Diagnostic accuracy of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) within a civilian primary care sample

被引:28
作者
Williamson, Meredith L. C. [1 ]
Stickley, Mariah M. [2 ]
Armstrong, Trey W. [2 ]
Jackson, Kaylee [2 ]
Console, Katie [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, 2900 East 29th St,Suite 100, Bryan, TX 77802 USA
[2] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Bryan, TX 77802 USA
关键词
diagnostic screener; PC-PTSD-5; posttraumatic stress disorder; primary care; PTSD diagnosis; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; PHYSICAL HEALTH; LOW-INCOME; COMORBIDITY; PREVALENCE; SYMPTOMS; TRAUMA; TRENDS; ADULTS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/jclp.23405
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Screen for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-5) (PC-PTSD-5) as a screening tool for the identification of PTSD among a civilian sample receiving behavioral health treatment within a primary care setting. Validation within a civilian sample will increase the generalizability of the PC-PTSD-5 as a brief screening measure to identify PTSD within primary care practices. Method The present study is a retrospective review of data (N = 198) collected as part of a patient registry for an integrated behavioral health consultation service within a primary care clinic. The PC-PTSD-5 was administered as part of a standardized set of brief screening measures and a standard clinical interview. Diagnostic validation was accomplished via a consensus model between a board-certified family medicine physician and a licensed psychologist along with medical/psychology trainees. Results Fifty-two participants (26.26%) out of 198 who completed the PC-PTSD-5 were diagnosed with PTSD. The PC-PTSD-5 demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = 0.933, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.901-0.965). A cutoff score of 4 maximized sensitivity (sensitivity% = 100) while maintaining acceptable specificity (specificity% = 85.2). This score also maximized efficiency (kappa[0.5] = 0.77, SE = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.67-0.86) and maintained a good (>= 0.60) quality index for specificity (kappa[0] = 0.61). Conclusion The PC-PTSD-5 maintained strong diagnostic accuracy within a civilian primary care sample.
引用
收藏
页码:2299 / 2308
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The psychometric properties of the Swahili version of the Primary Care Post Traumatic Stress Disorder screen for DSM-5 among adults in Kenya
    Mwangala, Patrick N.
    Guni, Joseph Newton
    Mwangi, Paul
    Makandi, Millicent
    Kerubo, Anita
    Odhiambo, Rachel
    Abubakar, Amina
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 15
  • [42] The Appearance of Multidimensionality: Exploring the Case for Unidimensionality of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 Using a Firefighter Sample
    Steinberg, Lynne
    Vujanovic, Anka A.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2024, 36 (03) : 235 - 241
  • [43] Intolerance of uncertainty and DSM-5 PTSD symptoms: Associations among a treatment seeking veteran sample
    Raines, Amanda M.
    Oglesby, Mary E.
    Walton, Jessica L.
    True, Gala
    Franklin, C. Laurel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2019, 62 : 61 - 67
  • [44] Factor Structure and Factorial Invariance of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 in Public Safety Personnel: Results From a Large and Diverse Sample
    Boehme, Blake A. E.
    Shields, Robyn E.
    Carleton, R. Nicholas
    Asmundson, Gordon J. G.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA-THEORY RESEARCH PRACTICE AND POLICY, 2025, 17 (03) : 576 - 582
  • [45] The structure of PTSD symptoms according to DSM-5 and IDC-11 proposal: A multi-sample analysis
    Cyniak-Cieciura, M.
    Staniaszek, K.
    Popiel, A.
    Praglowska, E.
    Zawadzki, B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 44 : 179 - 186
  • [46] Prevalence and Factor Structure of PTSD in DSM-5 Versus DSM-IV in a National Sample of Sexual Minority Women
    Kaysen, Debra
    Rhew, Isaac C.
    Bittinger, Joyce
    Bedard-Gilligan, Michele
    Garberson, Lisa A.
    Hodge, Kimberley A.
    Nguyen, Amanda J.
    Logan, Diane E.
    Dworkin, Emily R.
    Lindgren, Kristen P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2021, 36 (21-22) : NP12388 - NP12410
  • [47] Exploring mood symptoms overlap in PTSD diagnosis: ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria compared in a sample of subjects with Bipolar Disorder
    Carmassi, Claudia
    Bertelloni, Carlo Antonio
    Cordone, Annalisa
    Cappelli, Andrea
    Massimetti, Enrico
    Dell'Oste, Valerio
    Dell'Osso, Liliana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2020, 276 : 205 - 211
  • [48] Validation of Abbreviated Four- and Eight-Item Versions of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 in a Traumatically Injured Sample
    Geier, Timothy J.
    Hunt, Joshua C.
    Hanson, Jessica L.
    Heyrman, Katelyn
    Larsen, Sadie E.
    Brasel, Karen J.
    deRoon-Cassini, Terri A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2020, 33 (03) : 218 - 226
  • [49] Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in a sample of patients evaluated for acute coronary syndrome: A factor analysis of the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
    Scott, Allie W.
    Cornelius, Talea
    Schwartz, Joseph E.
    Fray, Nakesha
    Kronish, Ian M.
    Edmondson, Donald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2025, 369 : 653 - 661
  • [50] What Should Primary Care Providers Know About the Changes in DSM-5?
    Ian M. Kronish
    Ravi N. Shah
    Nathalie Moise
    [J]. Current Psychiatry Reports, 2016, 18