Diagnostic accuracy of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) within a civilian primary care sample

被引:28
作者
Williamson, Meredith L. C. [1 ]
Stickley, Mariah M. [2 ]
Armstrong, Trey W. [2 ]
Jackson, Kaylee [2 ]
Console, Katie [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, 2900 East 29th St,Suite 100, Bryan, TX 77802 USA
[2] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Bryan, TX 77802 USA
关键词
diagnostic screener; PC-PTSD-5; posttraumatic stress disorder; primary care; PTSD diagnosis; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; PHYSICAL HEALTH; LOW-INCOME; COMORBIDITY; PREVALENCE; SYMPTOMS; TRAUMA; TRENDS; ADULTS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/jclp.23405
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Screen for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-5) (PC-PTSD-5) as a screening tool for the identification of PTSD among a civilian sample receiving behavioral health treatment within a primary care setting. Validation within a civilian sample will increase the generalizability of the PC-PTSD-5 as a brief screening measure to identify PTSD within primary care practices. Method The present study is a retrospective review of data (N = 198) collected as part of a patient registry for an integrated behavioral health consultation service within a primary care clinic. The PC-PTSD-5 was administered as part of a standardized set of brief screening measures and a standard clinical interview. Diagnostic validation was accomplished via a consensus model between a board-certified family medicine physician and a licensed psychologist along with medical/psychology trainees. Results Fifty-two participants (26.26%) out of 198 who completed the PC-PTSD-5 were diagnosed with PTSD. The PC-PTSD-5 demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = 0.933, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.901-0.965). A cutoff score of 4 maximized sensitivity (sensitivity% = 100) while maintaining acceptable specificity (specificity% = 85.2). This score also maximized efficiency (kappa[0.5] = 0.77, SE = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.67-0.86) and maintained a good (>= 0.60) quality index for specificity (kappa[0] = 0.61). Conclusion The PC-PTSD-5 maintained strong diagnostic accuracy within a civilian primary care sample.
引用
收藏
页码:2299 / 2308
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Examining the diagnostic utility of the DSM-5 PTSD symptoms among male and female returning veterans
    Green, Jonathan D.
    Annunziata, Anthony
    Kleiman, Sarah E.
    Bovin, Michelle J.
    Harwell, Aaron M.
    Fox, Annie M. L.
    Black, Shimrit K.
    Schnurr, Paula P.
    Holowka, Darren W.
    Rosen, Raymond C.
    Keane, Terence M.
    Marx, Brian P.
    DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2017, 34 (08) : 752 - 760
  • [32] Comparing the dimensional structure and diagnostic algorithms between DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD in children and adolescents
    Sachser, Cedric
    Berliner, Lucy
    Holt, Tonje
    Jensen, Tine
    Jungbluth, Nathaniel
    Risch, Elizabeth
    Rosner, Rita
    Goldbeck, Lutz
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 27 (02) : 181 - 190
  • [33] Dimensionality of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms: Validation of the Chinese version of the posttraumatic diagnostic scale for DSM-5 across multiple trauma samples
    Su, Yi-Jen
    Kung, Yi-Wen
    Hung, Fu-Chien
    Chen, Sue-Huei
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2020, 74
  • [34] A factor analytic investigation of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms in a culturally diverse sample of refugees resettled in Australia
    Philippa Specker
    Belinda J. Liddell
    Yulisha Byrow
    Richard A. Bryant
    Angela Nickerson
    Conflict and Health, 12
  • [35] Using the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 to Screen for PTSD in the Chinese Context: A Pilot Study in a Psychiatric Sample
    Fung, Hong Wang
    Chan, Chitat
    Lee, Cheng Yang
    Ross, Colin A.
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED SOCIAL WORK, 2019, 16 (06) : 643 - 651
  • [36] Evaluating the stability of DSM-5 PTSD symptom network structure in a national sample of US military veterans
    von Stockert, Sophia H. H.
    Fried, Eiko I.
    Armour, Cherie
    Pietrzak, Robert H.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2018, 229 : 63 - 68
  • [37] Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 in a sample of trauma exposed mental health service users
    Roberts, Neil P.
    Kitchiner, Neil J.
    Lewis, Catrin E.
    Downes, Anthony J.
    Bisson, Jonathan I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [38] A factor analytic investigation of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms in a culturally diverse sample of refugees resettled in Australia
    Specker, Philippa
    Liddell, Belinda J.
    Byrow, Yulisha
    Bryant, Richard A.
    Nickerson, Angela
    CONFLICT AND HEALTH, 2018, 12
  • [39] Applying the PTSD Checklist-Civilian and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 Crosswalk in a Traumatic Brain Injury Sample: A Veterans Affairs Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study
    Wyant, Hannah N.
    Silva, Marc A.
    Agtarap, Stephanie
    Klocksieben, Farina A.
    Smith, Teagen
    Nakase-Richardson, Risa
    Miles, Shannon R.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2024, 36 (6-7) : 425 - 432
  • [40] What Should Primary Care Providers Know About the Changes in DSM-5?
    Kronish, Ian M.
    Shah, Ravi N.
    Moise, Nathalie
    CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS, 2016, 18 (03) : 1 - 9