Quality of web-based information for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study

被引:9
作者
Barrow, A. [1 ]
Palmer, S. [1 ]
Thomas, S. [1 ]
Guy, S. [1 ]
Brotherton, J. [1 ]
Dear, L. [1 ]
Pearson, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West England, Fac Hlth & Appl Sci, Dept Allied Hlth Profess, Glenside Campus,Blackberry Hill, Bristol BS16 1DD, Avon, England
关键词
Osteoarthritis; Internet; Patient education; Websites; WORLD-WIDE-WEB; HEALTH INFORMATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; INTERNET; ONLINE; MANAGEMENT; INSTRUMENTS; SEARCH; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.physio.2018.02.003
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic condition that affects over 8.75 million people in the UK. Approximately 43% of people in the UK search for health and medical information online. However, health information on the internet is of variable quality. Research into the quality of online OA information is dated and there is a need to evaluate the existing information. Objectives To assess the quality of websites which provide educational information for patients with OA. Design Electronic cross-sectional survey. Methods The search term 'osteoarthritis' was entered into the five popular UK-based search engines in order to identify 50 unique websites. These websites were appraised by two assessors using criteria developed from the available literature and recent guidelines of the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. The appraisal considered the general quality of the website and OA-specific content. Results Most of the websites evaluated (34/50, 68%) scored more than half of the maximum available quality score (max score 59). The median total score was 41. For general quality of the website, the median score was nine (range three to 16, out of 16), and for OA-specific content, the median score was 31 (range two to 43, out of 43). Websites of higher quality were created more recently, disclosed sources of information, had external seals of approval and directed the reader on to other relevant websites. Conclusions The internet is a potentially useful tool for educating and empowering healthcare consumers. The websites evaluated were generally of a 'high' standard; however, there was wide variation in the quality of information. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Chartered Society of Physiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 326
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [32] Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet - Caveant lector et viewer - Let the reader and viewer beware
    Silberg, WM
    Lundberg, GD
    Musacchio, RA
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (15): : 1244 - 1245
  • [33] Going online for health advice: Changes in usage and trust practices over the last five years
    Sillence, Elizabeth
    Briggs, Pam
    Harris, Peter
    Fishwick, Lesley
    [J]. INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2007, 19 (03) : 397 - 406
  • [34] Stanford J., 2002, EXPERTS VS ONLINE CO
  • [35] A Model for Online Consumer Health Information Quality
    Stvilia, Besiki
    Mon, Lorri
    Yi, Yong Jeong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 60 (09): : 1781 - 1791
  • [36] Urbaniak G.C., 1997, Research Randomizer
  • [37] UWE Research Ethics Committee, 2012, RES ETH COMM POL PRO
  • [38] Health information on the Internet: a qualitative study of NHS Direct Online users
    Williams, P
    Huntington, P
    Nicholas, D
    [J]. ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 55 (5-6): : 304 - 312