A Technological Scenario for a Healthier, More Equitable and Sustainable Europe in 2040: Citizen Perceptions and Policy Implications

被引:6
作者
Xhelili, Arlind [1 ]
Strube, Rosa [1 ]
Grossi, Francesca [1 ]
Zverinova, Iva [2 ]
Taylor, Timothy [3 ]
Martinez-Juarez, Pablo [4 ]
Quiroga, Sonia [5 ]
Suarez, Cristina [5 ]
Gjorgjev, Dragan [6 ]
机构
[1] Collaborating Ctr Sustainable Consumpt & Prod CSC, D-42107 Wuppertal, Germany
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Environm Ctr CUNI, Prague 16200, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Truro TR1 3HD, England
[4] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Hlth Econ Grp, Exeter EX1 2LU, Devon, England
[5] Univ Alcala, Dept Econ, Alcala De Henares 28801, Spain
[6] Inst Publ Hlth Republ Macedonia IJZRM, Skopje 1000, North Macedonia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
sustainability; health; equity; lifestyles; future scenarios; technology; citizen insights; policy recommendations; FOCUS GROUPS;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17010231
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article aims at exploring, understanding and comparing European citizens' insights and perceptions towards "My life between realities", a positive future scenario which depicts a narrative of reaching healthier, more equitable and sustainable societies by 2040 with the support of technology and technological solutions. It responds to the need for gathering and incorporating more citizen insights into future policy developments and strategic actions to tackle the global challenge of unsustainable development. Citizens of five European countries-the Czech Republic, Germany, North Macedonia, Spain and the United Kingdom-have been consulted through focus groups. The exercise has uncovered citizens' preferences and attitudes towards four main lifestyle areas; namely, green spaces, energy efficient housing, active mobility and (food) consumption. The technological attributes of the scenario led to citizens expressing diametrically opposed and critical perceptions and attitudes. Given the prospects of technology in driving sustainable development, based on these insights, policy recommendations for the better integration and acceptance of technological advances by the public are discussed herein.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] The focus groups in social research: advantages and disadvantages
    Acocella, Ivana
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2012, 46 (04) : 1125 - 1136
  • [2] Akenji L., 2016, A framework for shaping sustainable lifestyles
  • [3] The Emergence of Personalized Health Technology
    Allen, Luke Nelson
    Christie, Gillian Pepall
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (05)
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, Understanding the Socio-Economic divide in Europe (Issue January)
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2019, POP STRUCT AG
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, Human Development Report 2016, Human Development for Everyone
  • [7] [Anonymous], SUST DEV TIM
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2006, CAPITALISM 3 0 GUIDE
  • [9] 'I feel less lonely': what older people say about participating in a social networking website
    Ballantyne, Alison
    Trenwith, Luke
    Zubrinich, Samara
    Corlis, Megan
    [J]. QUALITY IN AGEING AND OLDER ADULTS, 2010, 11 (03): : 25 - 35
  • [10] What is participatory research?
    Cornwall, A
    Jewkes, R
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1995, 41 (12) : 1667 - 1676