BIASED ARBITRATORS AND TRIBUNAL DECISIONS AGAINST DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: STYLIZED FACTS ON INVESTOR-STATE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT

被引：6
|
作者：
Nunnenkamp, Peter [1 ]
机构：
[1] Kiel Inst World Econ, Kiel, Germany
来源：
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT | 2017年 / 29卷 / 06期
关键词：
investor-state dispute settlement; arbitrators; pro-investor bias; developing countries;
D O I：
10.1002/jid.3279
中图分类号：
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号：
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要：
Based on UNCTAD's database on investor-state dispute settlements (ISDS), we find that many cases raised against developing countries are handled by fairly unbiased tribunals. As for ISDS outcomes, the overall ratio of investor wins over state wins is below one. Nevertheless, it is harder for developing countries, compared to high-income countries, to achieve state wins in international arbitration of investment disputes. Copyright (C) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码：851 / 854
页数：4
相关论文
共 28 条
123