Cholecystectomy is associated with higher risk of recurrence after microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Yang, Hongcai [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yi [3 ]
Dou, Jianping [2 ]
Cui, Rui [2 ]
Cheng, Zhigang [2 ]
Han, Zhiyu [2 ]
Liu, Fangyi [2 ]
Yu, Xiaoling [2 ]
Zhou, Xiang [3 ]
Yu, Jie [2 ]
Liang, Ping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nankai Univ, Sch Med, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Intervent Ultrasound, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Natl Canc Ctr,Dept Intervent Therapy, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Cholecystectomy; microwave ablation; hepatocellular carcinoma; propensity score matching; GAMMA-GLUTAMYL-TRANSFERASE; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; CANCER INCIDENCE; LIVER; SURVIVAL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; GALLBLADDER; GALLSTONES; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2019.0246
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore the association between cholecystectomy and the prognostic outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent microwave ablation (MWA). Methods: Patients with HCC (n = 921) who underwent MWA were included and divided into cholecystectomy (n = 114) and non-cholecystectomy groups (n = 807). After propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:2 ratio, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed to compare prognostic outcomes between the cholecystectomy (n = 114) and non-cholecystectomy groups (n = 228). Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to assess potential risk factors for OS and DFS. Major complications were also compared between the groups. Results: After matching, no significant differences between groups were observed in baseline characteristics. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 96.5%, 82.1%, and 67.1% in the cholecystectomy group, and 97.4%, 85.2%, and 74.4% in the non-cholecystectomy group (P = 0.396); the 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 58.4%, 34.5%, and 26.6% in the cholecystectomy group, and 73.6%, 44.7%, and 32.2% in the non-cholecystectomy group (P = 0.026), respectively. The intrahepatic distant recurrence rate in the cholecystectomy group was significantly higher than that in the non-cholecystectomy group (P = 0.026), and the local tumor recurrence and extrahepatic recurrence rates did not significantly differ between the groups (P = 0.609 and P = 0.879). Multivariate analysis revealed that cholecystectomy (HR = 1.364, 95% CI 1.023-1.819, P = 0.035), number of tumors (2 vs. 1: HR = 2.744, 95% CI 1.925-3.912, P < 0.001; 3 vs. 1: HR = 3.411, 95% CI 2.021-5.759, P < 0.001), and gamma-GT levels (HR = 1.003, 95% CI 1.000-1.006, P < 0.024) were independent risk factors for DFS. The best gamma-GT level cut-off value for predicting median DFS was 39.6 U/L (area under the curve = 0.600, P < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between cholecystectomy and gamma-GT level (r = 0.108, 95% CI -0.001-0.214, P = 0.047). Subgroup analysis showed that the DFS rates were significantly higher in the non-cholecystectomy group than the cholecystectomy group when gamma-GT >= 39.6 U/L (P = 0.044). The 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-year recurrence rates from the time of cholecystectomy were 2.63%, 21.93%, 42.11%, 58.77%, and 65.79%, respectively. A significant positive correlation was observed between cholecystectomy and the time from cholecystectomy to recurrence (r = 0.205, 95% CI 0.016-0.379, P = 0.029). There were no significant differences in complications between groups (P = 0.685). Conclusions: Patients with HCC who underwent cholecystectomy were more likely to develop intrahepatic distant recurrence after MWA, an outcome probably associated with increased gamma-GT levels. Moreover, the recurrence rates increased with time.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 491
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A nationwide propensity score analysis comparing ablation and resection for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Rasic, Gordana
    de Geus, Susanna W. L.
    Beaulieu-Jones, Brendin
    Kasumova, Gyulnara G.
    Kent, Tara S.
    Ng, Sing Chau
    McAneny, David
    Tseng, Jennifer F.
    Sachs, Teviah E.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 127 (07) : 1125 - 1134
  • [42] Factors Associated with Tumor Progression After Percutaneous Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison Between Monopolar Radiofrequency and Microwaves. Results of a Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Damien Bouda
    Vincent Barrau
    Lucas Raynaud
    Marco Dioguardi Burgio
    Luisa Paulatto
    Vincent Roche
    Annie Sibert
    Nadia Moussa
    Valérie Vilgrain
    Maxime Ronot
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2020, 43 : 1608 - 1618
  • [43] Factors Associated with Tumor Progression After Percutaneous Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison Between Monopolar Radiofrequency and Microwaves. Results of a Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Bouda, Damien
    Barrau, Vincent
    Raynaud, Lucas
    Burgio, Marco Dioguardi
    Paulatto, Luisa
    Roche, Vincent
    Sibert, Annie
    Moussa, Nadia
    Vilgrain, Valerie
    Ronot, Maxime
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (11) : 1608 - 1618
  • [44] Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study
    Zheng, Hang
    Liu, Kaiwen
    Yang, Yao
    Liu, Bo
    Zhao, Xinya
    Chen, Yong
    Feng, Yuemin
    Meng, Min
    Tan, Xu
    Zhu, Qiang
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (07) : 4657 - 4666
  • [45] The prognostic significance of serum HBeAg on the recurrence and long-term survival after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis
    Shen, J.
    Liu, J.
    Li, C.
    Wen, T.
    Yan, L.
    Yang, J.
    JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, 2018, 25 (09) : 1057 - 1065
  • [46] Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter, propensity score matching analysis
    Ma, Zi-Hui
    Lin, Xiao-Lu
    Liu, Feng-Hua
    Zhang, Jing-Lei
    Yan, Mao-Lin
    Song, Xing-Chao
    Guo, Lei
    Xue, Jie
    Lu, Chong-De
    Shi, Jie
    Meng, Yan
    Cheng, Shu-Qun
    Guo, Wei-Xing
    BMC CANCER, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [47] Surgical Resection plus Radiofrequency Ablation versus Radical Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Zhou, Cheng
    Zhang, Xiangyu
    Peng, Yuanfei
    Zhou, Kaigian
    Hu, Jie
    Yu, Lei
    Chen, Feiyu
    Qiu, Shuangjian
    Zhou, Jian
    Fan, Jia
    Zhang, Lan
    Wang, Zheng
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 10 (17): : 3933 - 3940
  • [48] Repeat laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter, propensity score matching analysis
    Ma, Zihui
    Lin, Xiaolu
    Zhang, Jinglei
    Song, Xingchao
    Yan, Maolin
    Guo, Lei
    Xue, Jie
    Lu, Chongde
    Shi, Jie
    Cheng, Shuqun
    Guo, Weixing
    BIOSCIENCE TRENDS, 2024,
  • [49] Chemoembolization versus radiofrequency ablation for single small (≤ 3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
    Kim, Gun Ha
    Kim, Jin Hyoung
    Shim, Ju Hyun
    Kim, So Yeon
    Kim, Pyeong Hwa
    Ko, Heung-Kyu
    Gwon, Dong Il
    Shin, Ji Hoon
    Lee, So Jung
    Chu, Hee Ho
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Kim, Nayoung
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (09) : 5517 - 5528
  • [50] STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY VERSUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION FOR SINGLE SMALL HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS
    Ueno, Masayuki
    Takabatake, Hiroyuki
    Kayahara, Takahisa
    Morimoto, Youichi
    Mizuno, Motowo
    HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 72 : 708A - 709A