Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Purposes of Groundwater Control System Design

被引:9
作者
Bajic, D. [1 ]
Polomcic, D. [1 ]
Ratkovic, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Min & Geol, Dept Hydrogeol, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
Groundwater management; Hydrodynamic model; Multi-criteria decision-making; Expert judgment; Linguistic variables; Fuzzy optimization; Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; MULTIOBJECTIVE FUZZY OPTIMIZATION; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; WATER; CRITERIA; RANKING; ALTERNATIVES; SELECTION; NUMBERS; SEARCH; MINE;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-017-1777-4
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The best way for an engineer or scientist to express their knowledge, experience and opinions is day-to-day verbal communication. When a decision needs to be made about an optimal groundwater control system, the decision-making criteria need not always be numerical values. If fuzzy logic is used in multi-criteria decision-making, the criteria are described by linguistic variables that can be represented through fuzzy membership and expert judgment is used to describe such a system. Prior hydrodynamic modeling of the aquifer regime defines the management scenarios for groundwater control and provides an indication of their effectiveness. In this paper, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is applied to deal with a trending decision problem such as the selection of the optimal groundwater management system. Linguistic variables are used to evaluate all the criteria and sub-criteria that influence the final decision and the numerical weights of each alternative are determined by mathematical calculations. The paper presents a part of the algorithm - fuzzy optimization in hydrodynamic analysis, which leads to the selection of the optimal groundwater control system. The proposed method is applied in a real case study of an open-cast mine.
引用
收藏
页码:4759 / 4784
页数:26
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Aggregation of fuzzy views of a large number of stakeholders for multi-objective flood management decision-making [J].
Akter, T ;
Simonovic, SP .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 77 (02) :133-143
[2]  
Ardakanian R, 2004, 1 NAT C WAT RES MAN
[3]   Extended fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in water and environmental management (case study: Lake Urmia Basin, Iran) [J].
Azarnivand, Ali ;
Hashemi-Madani, Farkhondeh Sadat ;
Banihabib, Mohammad Ebrahim .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (01) :13-26
[4]  
Bajic D, 2014, GEOL BALK POLUOSTRVA, DOI [10.2298/GABP1475103B, DOI 10.2298/GABP1475103B]
[5]   MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS WITH FUZZY PAIRWISE COMPARISONS [J].
BOENDER, CGE ;
DEGRAAN, JG ;
LOOTSMA, FA .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 29 (02) :133-143
[6]   FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (03) :233-247
[7]   Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach [J].
Chan, Felix T. S. ;
Kumar, Niraj .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 35 (04) :417-431
[8]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[9]   Uncertainty analysis in a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis tool for river catchment management [J].
Chen, H. ;
Wood, M. D. ;
Linstead, C. ;
Maltby, E. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2011, 26 (04) :395-405
[10]   Comparison of Different Multi Criteria Decision-Making Models in Prioritizing Flood Management Alternatives [J].
Chitsaz, Nastaran ;
Banihabib, Mohammad Ebrahim .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (08) :2503-2525