Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Fecal Calprotectin and Immunochemical Occult Blood Tests for Diagnosis of Organic Bowel Disease in Primary Care: The Cost-Effectiveness of a Decision Rule for Abdominal Complaints in Primary Care (CEDAR) Study

被引:66
作者
Kok, Liselotte [1 ]
Elias, Sjoerd G. [1 ]
Witteman, Ben J. M. [2 ]
Goedhard, Jelle G. [3 ]
Muris, Jean W. M. [4 ]
Moons, Karel G. M. [1 ]
de Wit, Niek J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Gelderse Vallei Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Ede, Netherlands
[3] Atrium Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Heerlen, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst CAPHRI, Dept Gen Practice, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
GENERAL-PRACTICE; OPEN-ACCESS; ADENOMATOUS POLYPS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; APPROPRIATENESS; COLONOSCOPY; GUIDELINES; INFLAMMATION; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1373/clinchem.2011.177980
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Fecal biomarker tests that differentiate between organic bowel disease (OBD) and non-OBD in primary care patients with persistent lower-abdomen complaints could reduce the number of unnecessary referrals for endoscopy. We quantified the accuracy of fecal calprotectin and immunochemical occult blood (iFOBT) point-of-care (POC) tests and a calprotectin ELISA in primary care patients with suspected OBD. METHODS: We performed biomarker tests on fecal samples from 386 patients with lower-abdomen complaints suggestive for OBD. Endoscopic and histological diagnosis served as reference. RESULTS: OBD was diagnosed in 99 patients (prevalence 25.9%); 19 had adenocarcinoma, 53 adenoma, and 27 inflammatory bowel disease. Sensitivity for OBD was 0.64 (95% CI 0.54-0.72) for calprotectin POC, 0.56 (0.46-0.66) for iFOBT POC, and 0.74 (0.65-0.82) for calprotectin ELISA; specificities were 0.53 (0.48-0.59), 0.83 (0.78-0.87), and 0.47 (0.41-0.53), respectively. Negative predictive values (NPVs) were 0.81 (0.74-0.86), 0.85 (0.80-0.88), and 0.84 (0.78-0.89); positive predictive values (PPVs) varied from 0.32 (0.26-0.39) and 0.33 (0.27-0.39) (calprotectin tests) to 0.53 (0.44-0.63) (iFOBT POC). Combining the 2 POC tests improved sensitivity [0.79 (0.69-0.86)] and NPV [0.87 (0.81-0.91)] but lowered specificity [0.49 (0.44-0.55)] and PPV [0.35 (0.29-0.42)]. When adenomas <= 1 cm were considered non-OBD, the NPV of all tests improved to >0.90 [combined POC tests, 0.97 (0.93-0.99)]. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic accuracy of the tests alone or combined was insufficient when all adenomas were considered OBD. When only adenomas >1 cm were considered OBD, all tests could rule out OBD to a reasonable extent, particularly the combined POC tests. The tests were less useful for inclusion of OBD. (C) 2012 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
引用
收藏
页码:989 / 998
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomatous polyps [J].
Atkin, WS ;
Saunders, BP .
GUT, 2002, 51 :V6-V9
[2]   The European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit:: a prospective study [J].
Balaguer, F ;
Llach, J ;
Castells, A ;
Bordas, JM ;
Pellisé, M ;
Rodríguez-Moranta, F ;
Mata, A ;
Fernández-Esparrach, G ;
Ginès, A ;
Piqué, JM .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 21 (05) :609-613
[3]   Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (01) :1-6
[4]  
van der Horst H E, 2002, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V146, P1516
[5]  
Buhlmann Laboratories AG, 2008, CALPR ELISA EK CAL I
[6]   SENSITIVITY OF GUAIAC-IMPREGNATED CARDS FOR THE DETECTION OF COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA [J].
CROWLEY, ML ;
FREEMAN, LD ;
MOTTET, MD ;
STRONG, RM ;
SWEENEY, BF ;
BROWER, RA ;
SHARMA, SP ;
ANDERSON, DS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1983, 5 (02) :127-130
[7]   How useful are the Rome II criteria for identification of upper gastrointestinal disorders in general practice? [J].
Farup, PG ;
Vandvik, PO ;
Aabakken, L .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 40 (11) :1284-1289
[8]   THE INCIDENCE AND OUTCOME OF RECTAL BLEEDING IN GENERAL-PRACTICE [J].
FIJTEN, GH ;
MURIS, JWM ;
STARMANS, R ;
KNOTTNERUS, JA ;
BLIJHAM, GH ;
KREBBER, TFWA .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1993, 10 (03) :283-287
[9]   RISK-FACTORS FOR BLOOD-LOSS FROM ADENOMATOUS POLYPS OF THE LARGE BOWEL - A COLONOSCOPIC EVALUATION WITH HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION [J].
FOUTCH, PG ;
MANNE, RK ;
SANOWSKI, RA ;
GAINES, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1988, 10 (01) :50-56
[10]   Questions and answers on the role of faecal calprotectin as a biological marker in inflammatory bowel disease [J].
Gisbert, J. P. ;
McNicholl, A. G. .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2009, 41 (01) :56-66