Organic carbon bioavailability: Is it a good driver to choose the best biological nitrogen removal process?

被引:48
作者
Bonassa, Gabriela [1 ]
Bolsan, Alice Chiapetti [2 ]
Hollas, Camila Ester [1 ]
Venturin, Bruno [1 ]
Candido, Daniela [3 ]
Chini, Angelica [1 ]
De Pra, Marina C. [4 ]
Antes, Fabiane Goldschmidt [5 ]
Campos, Jose Luis [6 ]
Kunz, Airton [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Western Parana State Univ, BR-85819110 Cascavel, PR, Brazil
[2] Western Santa Catarina Univ, BR-89600000 Joacaba, SC, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Fronteira Sul, BR-99700000 Erechim, Brazil
[4] Fed Univ Technol Parana UTFPR, BR-85660000 Dois Vizinhos, PR, Brazil
[5] Embrapa Suinos & Aves, BR-89715899 Concordia, SC, Brazil
[6] Univ Adolfo Ibanez, Fac Ingn & Ciencias, Avda Padre Hurtado 750, Vina Del Mar 2503500, Chile
关键词
Economic viability; Anammox-based process; Biodegradable organic carbon concentration; Nitrogen removal process; Nitrification; denitrification; PARTIAL NITRIFICATION-ANAMMOX; SWINE WASTE-WATER; MATURE LANDFILL LEACHATE; PARTIAL NITRITATION; INTERMITTENT AERATION; COD/N RATIO; PARTIAL DENITRIFICATION; PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; TREATMENT-PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147390
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
concentrations, which are the main factors to determine the best treatment process, based on operational and economic terms. In summary, it depends on the wastewater carbon biodegradability, which implies in the wastewater treatment cost. Thus, to apply the conventional nitrification/denitrification process a CODb/N ratio higher than 3.5 is required to achieve full nitrogen removal efficiency. For an economic point of view, according to the analysis the minimum CODb/gN for successful nitrogen removal by nitrification/denitrification is 5.8 g. If ratios lower than 3.5 are applied, for successfully higher nitrogen removal rates and the economic feasibility of the <comment>Superscript/Subscript Available</comment> ABSTRACT Organic carbon can affect the biological nitrogen removal process since the Anammox, heterotrophic and denitrifying bacteria have different affinities and feedback in relation to carbon/nitrogen ratio. Therefore, we reviewed the wastewater carbon concentration, its biodegradability and bioavailability to choose the appropriate nitrogen removal process between conventional (nitrification-denitrification) and Anammox-based process (i.e. integrated with the partial nitritation, nitritation, simultaneous partial nitrification and denitrification or partial-denitrification). This review will cover: (i) strategies to choose the best nitrogen removal route according to the wastewater characteristics in relation to the organic matter bioavailability and biodegradability; (ii) strategies to efficiently remove nitrogen and the remaining carbon from effluent in anammox-based process and its operating cost; (iii) an economic analysis to determine the operational costs of two-units Anammox-based process when compared with the commonly applied one-unit Anammox system (partial-nitritation-Anammox). On this re-view, a list of alternatives are summarized and explained for different nitrogen and biodegradable organic carbon concentrations, which are the main factors to determine the best treatment process, based on operational and economic terms. In summary, it depends on the wastewater carbon biodegradability, which implies in the wastewater treatment cost. Thus, to apply the conventional nitrification/denitrification process a CODb/N ratio higher than 3.5 is required to achieve full nitrogen removal efficiency. For an economic point of view, according to the analysis the minimum CODb/gN for successful nitrogen removal by nitrification/denitrification is 5.8 g. If ratios lower than 3.5 are applied, for successfully higher nitrogen removal rates and the economic feasibility of the treatment, Anammox-based routes can be applied to the wastewater treatment plant. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 142 条
[1]   Gel immobilization: A strategy to improve the performance of anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) bacteria for nitrogen-rich wastewater treatment [J].
Ahmad, Hafiz Adeel ;
Ni, Shou-Qing ;
Ahmad, Shakeel ;
Zhang, Jian ;
Ali, Muhammad ;
Ngo, Huu Hao ;
Guo, Wenshan ;
Tan, Zuwan ;
Wang, Qi .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 313
[2]   Review of impact of nanoparticle additives on anaerobic digestion and methane generation [J].
Ajay, C. M. ;
Mohan, Sooraj ;
Dinesha, P. ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
FUEL, 2020, 277
[3]   Energy saving anammox technology-based nitrogen removal and bioenergy recovery from wastewater: Inhibition mechanisms, state-of-the-art control strategies, and prospects [J].
Arora, Amarpreet Singh ;
Nawaz, Alam ;
Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul ;
Ismail, Sherif ;
Aslam, Muhammad ;
Tawfik, Ahmed ;
Yun, Choa Mun ;
Lee, Moonyong .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 135
[4]   NOB suppression and adaptation strategies in the partial nitrification-Anammox process for a poultry manure anaerobic digester [J].
Arriagada, Constanza ;
Guzman-Fierro, Victor ;
Giustinianovich, Elisa ;
Alejo-Alvarez, Luz ;
Behar, Jack ;
Pereira, Luis ;
Campos, Victor ;
Fernandez, Katherina ;
Roeckel, Marlene .
PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2017, 58 :258-265
[5]   Nitrogen removal by simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox and denitrification (SNAD) in a structured-bed reactor treating animal feed processing wastewater: Inhibitory effects and bacterial community [J].
Bandeira de Almeida, Ricardo Gabriel ;
Diniz dos Santos, Carla Eloisa ;
Luders, Taissa Colucio ;
Del Nery, Valeria ;
Leal, Cintia Dutra ;
Pereira, Alyne Duarte ;
Araujo, Juliana Calabria ;
Davenport, Russel J. ;
Barana, Ana Claudia ;
Lopes, Deize Dias ;
Rissato Zamariolli Damianovic, Marcia Helena .
INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 2018, 133 :108-115
[6]   A new kinetic model to predict substrate inhibition and better efficiency in an airlift reactor on deammonification process [J].
Bonassa, Gabriela ;
Bolsan, Alice Chiapetti ;
Venturin, Bruno ;
De Pra, Marina Celant ;
Antes, Fabiane Goldschmidt ;
Hollas, Camila Ester ;
Johann, Gracielle ;
Coldebella, Arlei ;
Kunz, Airton .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 319
[7]  
Bortoli Marcelo, 2019, Rev. Ambient. Água, V14, pe2241, DOI 10.4136/ambi-agua.2241
[8]   Granular biomass floatation: A simple kinetic/stoichiometric explanation [J].
Campos, J. L. ;
Val del Rio, A. ;
Pedrouso, A. ;
Raux, P. ;
Giustinianovich, E. A. ;
Mosquera-Corral, A. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2017, 311 :63-71
[9]   Development of a denitrification system using primary sludge as solid carbon source - Potential to couple with anammox process [J].
Cao, Shenbin ;
Du, Rui ;
Zhou, Yan .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 737
[10]   Characterization of the refractory dissolved organic matters (rDOM) in sludge alkaline fermentation liquid driven denitrification: Effect of HRT on their fate and transformation [J].
Cao, Shenbin ;
Sun, Faqian ;
Lu, Dan ;
Zhou, Yan .
WATER RESEARCH, 2019, 159 :135-144