Quantitative assessment of microcalcification cluster image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis, 2-dimensional and synthetic mammography

被引:11
|
作者
Petropoulos, Andreas E. [1 ]
Skiadopoulos, Spyros G. [1 ]
Karahaliou, Anna N. [1 ]
Messaris, Gerasimos A. T. [2 ]
Arikidis, Nikolaos S. [1 ]
Costaridou, Lena I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, Patras 26504, Greece
[2] Univ Hosp Patras, Dept Med Phys, Patras 26504, Greece
关键词
Digital mammography; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Synthetic 2D images; Microcalcification cluster; Signal-difference-to-noise ratio; PERFORMANCE; DBT; 2D; TEXTURE; PHANTOM;
D O I
10.1007/s11517-019-02072-0
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Quantitative assessment of microcalcification (MC) cluster image quality is presented, in terms of cluster signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) intercomparison among digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2-dimensional (2D) and synthetic-2-dimensional (s2D) mammography. A phantom that provides realistic appearance of MC clusters located in uniform and nonuniform background was imaged in 2D and DBT, considering various scattering conditions. MC cluster SDNR differentiation is investigated with respect to MC particle size (uniform background) and surrounding parenchyma density (nonuniform background). An accurate MC cluster segmentation method was used to delineate individual MC particles and estimate MC cluster SDNR. Analysis of the uniform part of the phantom indicated higher performance of DBT and 2D over s2D for the smallest cluster size (106-177 mu m), no difference among mammographic modes for the largest MC cluster (224-354 mu m), and enhanced role of 2D for decreasing cluster size and increasing scattering. Analysis of the nonuniform part of the phantom indicated DBT performed better than 2D and s2D in case of dense parenchyma pattern, while 2D and s2D did not differ across parenchyma density patterns and scattering conditions. The presented MC cluster SDNR analysis was capable of revealing subtle differences among mammographic modes and suggests a methodology for clinical image quality assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 209
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer
    Ji Soo Choi
    Boo-Kyung Han
    Eun Young Ko
    Eun Sook Ko
    Soo Yeon Hahn
    Jung Hee Shin
    Min Jung Kim
    European Radiology, 2016, 26 : 2538 - 2546
  • [33] Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer
    Rossano Girometti
    Anna Linda
    Paola Conte
    Michele Lorenzon
    Isabella De Serio
    Katerina Jerman
    Viviana Londero
    Chiara Zuiani
    La radiologia medica, 2021, 126 : 1407 - 1414
  • [34] Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer
    Girometti, Rossano
    Linda, Anna
    Conte, Paola
    Lorenzon, Michele
    De Serio, Isabella
    Jerman, Katerina
    Londero, Viviana
    Zuiani, Chiara
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2021, 126 (11): : 1407 - 1414
  • [35] The threshold detectable mass diameter for 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Hadjipanteli, Andria
    Elangovan, Premkumar
    Mackenzie, Alistair
    Wells, Kevin
    Dance, David R.
    Young, Kenneth C.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 57 : 25 - 32
  • [36] Comparative analysis between synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for breast cancer detection and visibility
    Murakami, Ryusuke
    Uchiyama, Nachiko
    Tani, Hitomi
    Yoshida, Tamiko
    Kumita, Shinichiro
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2020, 7
  • [37] Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories
    Mariscotti, Giovanna
    Durando, Manuela
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Fasciano, Mirella
    Tagliafico, Alberto
    Bosco, Davide
    Casella, Cristina
    Bogetti, Camilla
    Bergamasco, Laura
    Fonio, Paolo
    Gandini, Giovanni
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 166 (03) : 765 - 773
  • [38] Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories
    Giovanna Mariscotti
    Manuela Durando
    Nehmat Houssami
    Mirella Fasciano
    Alberto Tagliafico
    Davide Bosco
    Cristina Casella
    Camilla Bogetti
    Laura Bergamasco
    Paolo Fonio
    Giovanni Gandini
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 166 : 765 - 773
  • [39] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Hovda, Tone
    Holen, Asne S.
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Albertsen, Judy
    Bjorndal, Hilde
    Brandal, Siri H. B.
    Gullien, Randi
    Lomo, Jon
    Park, Daehoon
    Romundstad, Linda
    Suhrke, Pal
    Vigeland, Einar
    Skaane, Per
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (03) : 787 - 794
  • [40] A comparison of image interpretation times in Full Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Astley, Susan
    Connor, Sophie
    Lim, Yit
    Tate, Catriona
    Entwistle, Helen
    Morris, Julie
    Whiteside, Sigrid
    Sergeant, Jamie
    Wilson, Mary
    Beetles, Ursula
    Boggis, Caroline
    Gilbert, Fiona
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2013, 8673