Integration of stochastic approaches in the life cycle cost analysis of sewer pipe applications

被引:4
|
作者
Jin, Yongliang [1 ]
机构
[1] Khafra Engn, 200 N Holliday St, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
关键词
Life cycle cost analysis; Markov chains model; Stochastic; Rigid pipe; Sewer system; Sensitivity analysis; Uncertainty; MAINTENANCE; DETERIORATION; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; HAZARD; MODELS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.05.011
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The objective of this paper is to integrate stochastic approaches in the life cycle cost analysis of sewer pipes. It is generally accepted that costs are of the greatest interest to the decision maker. The selection procedure primarily depends on the material availability as well as empirical information. Afterward costs in the maintenance phase lack consideration, which is mainly constrained by data availability and analysis techniques. This study focuses on the rigid pipe and evaluates the comparable application of reinforced concrete pipe (RCP), non-reinforced concrete pipe (NRCP), and vitrified clay pipe (VCP) in sewer systems. The life cycle cost analysis is performed throughout the material manufacturing, construction and maintenance phases. Particularly, the Markov chain model is used to predict systems' conditions that are used as a guidance for management in the maintenance phase. Under a given strategy, the cost estimate is extended to the steady state, providing a new cost comparison perspective. In addition, methods to evaluate the model uncertainty are also presented. Applying the bootstrapping approach, the analysis reveals that the Markov chains model demonstrates decent robustness. In the case study of a 24-in. pipe application, results show that NRCP demands the least initial building cost, while RCP is more cost effective considering longer service life time. Cost comparison and specific examples are also presented to demonstrate practical applications. This integrated approach allows decision-makers and stakeholders to understand and compare economic costs during alternative selections in practice. The methodology developed may also be applied in the life cycle analysis of other critical infrastructure systems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 43
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SEWER PIPE LIFE-CYCLE
    SHACKLETON, D
    CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1983, 53 (05): : 28 - 28
  • [2] Environmental life cycle analysis of pipe materials for sewer systems
    Vahidi, Ehsan
    Jin, Enze
    Das, Maithilee
    Singh, Mansukh
    Zhao, Fu
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2016, 27 : 167 - 174
  • [3] WHAT TYPE SEWER PIPE IS BEST - LIFE-CYCLE COST-ANALYSIS YIELDS ANSWER
    MOSS, T
    JANKIEWICZ, EJ
    CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1982, 52 (10): : 75 - 76
  • [4] APPROACHES TO LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS IN METALLURGY
    Sulc, Krystof
    Svecova, Lenka
    27TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METALLURGY AND MATERIALS (METAL 2018), 2018, : 1859 - 1862
  • [5] Life cycle analysis and sewer solids
    Gouda, H
    Ashley, RM
    Gilmour, D
    Smith, H
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 47 (04) : 185 - 192
  • [6] Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) for selection of sewer pipe materials
    Akhtar, Sharmin
    Reza, Bahareh
    Hewage, Kasun
    Shahriar, Anjuman
    Zargar, Amin
    Sadiq, Rehan
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2015, 17 (04) : 973 - 992
  • [7] Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) for selection of sewer pipe materials
    Sharmin Akhtar
    Bahareh Reza
    Kasun Hewage
    Anjuman Shahriar
    Amin Zargar
    Rehan Sadiq
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2015, 17 : 973 - 992
  • [8] Stochastic life-cycle cost analysis of wind parks
    Lagaros, Nikos D.
    Karlaftis, Matthew G.
    Paida, Maria K.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 144 : 117 - 127
  • [9] Stochastic Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement Preservation Treatments
    Pittenger, Dominique
    Gransberg, Douglas D.
    Zaman, Musharraf
    Riemer, Caleb
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2012, (2292) : 45 - 51
  • [10] Life cycle cost analysis of wind power considering stochastic uncertainties
    Li, Chiao-Ting
    Peng, Huei
    Sun, Jing
    ENERGY, 2014, 75 : 411 - 418