Ambivalence in nurses' use of the early warning score: A focussed ethnography in a hospital setting

被引:8
作者
Molgaard, Rikke R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jorgensen, Lone [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Christensen, Erika F. [1 ,5 ]
Gronkjaer, Mette [1 ,2 ]
Voldbjerg, Siri L. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Clin Nursing Res Unit, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Univ Coll Northern Denmark, Dept Nursing, Hjorring, Denmark
[4] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Clin Surg & Canc Treatment, Aalborg, Denmark
[5] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Ctr Prehosp & Emergency Res, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
clinical decision-making; clinical deterioration; early warning score; ethnography; nurses; nursing; screening tool; vital parameters; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SYSTEMS; STANDARDS; TRACK;
D O I
10.1111/jan.15118
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim This study describes and explores the influences in registered nurses' use of early warning scores to support clinical decisions in a hospital setting. Design A focussed ethnography allowed for the investigation of registered nurses' clinical practices in two wards in a Danish University Hospital. The study adhered to the 'Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research'. Methods Participant observation and ethnographic interviews were conducted from March 2019 to August 2019. Ten registered nurses were observed and interviewed, and four physicians were interviewed. Data were analysed using LeCompte and Schensul's ethnographic analysis. Findings The findings show the registered nurses' ambivalence towards the early warning score as a decision support system. Early warning score monitoring created a space for registered nurses to identify and initiate optimized care. However, when early warning scores contradicted registered nurses' clinical judgments, the latter were given priority in decisions even though elevated scores were not always accounted for in the situation. Moreover, we found unspoken expectations in the collaboration between physicians and registered nurses, which influenced the registered nurses' workloads and decisions regarding early warning scores. Conclusion Registered nurses' clinical judgment is essential to clinical decisions on the care and safety of patients if used combined with the early warning score. Interprofessional collaboration between registered nurses and physicians about the early warning score is challenged. Future research may address this challenge to explore how it should be operated as a collaboration tool. Impact The study adds knowledge to the evidence base of registered nurses' use of early warning score and the advantages and challenges associated with the use of these scoring systems. The study may provide valuable knowledge for the future development of policies or implementation strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:1461 / 1472
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] The pre-Medical Emergency Team response: Nurses' decision-making escalating deterioration to treating teams using urgent review criteria
    Bingham, Gordon
    Fossum, Mariann
    Hughes, Leanne
    Digby, Robin
    Bucknall, Tracey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (08) : 2171 - 2181
  • [2] Vital signs monitoring and nurse-patient interaction: A qualitative observational study of hospital practice
    Cardona-Morrell, M.
    Prgomet, M.
    Lake, R.
    Nicholson, M.
    Harrison, R.
    Long, J.
    Westbrook, J.
    Braithwaite, J.
    Hillman, K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2016, 56 : 9 - 16
  • [3] 'Errors' and omissions in paper-based early warning scores: the association with changes in vital signs-a database analysis
    Clifton, David A.
    Clifton, Lei
    Sandu, Dona-Maria
    Smith, G. B.
    Tarassenko, Lionel
    Vollam, Sarah A.
    Watkinson, Peter J.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (07):
  • [4] Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence
    Connolly, Fergal
    Byrne, Dara
    Lydon, Sinead
    Walsh, Chloe
    O'Connor, Paul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2017, 29 (08) : 973 - 980
  • [5] What are the patterns of compliance with Early Warning Track and Trigger Tools: A narrative review
    Credland, Nicola
    Dyson, Judith
    Johnson, Miriam J.
    [J]. APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2018, 44 : 39 - 47
  • [6] Strengths and limitations of early warning scores: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Downey, C. L.
    Tahir, W.
    Randell, R.
    Brown, J. M.
    Jayne, D. G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2017, 76 : 106 - 119
  • [7] How do nurses use the early warning score in their practice? A case study from an acute medical unit
    Foley, Claire
    Dowling, Maura
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2019, 28 (7-8) : 1183 - 1192
  • [8] The Copenhagen Triage Algorithm is non-inferior to a traditional triage algorithm: A cluster-randomized study
    Hasselbalch, Rasmus Bo
    Pries-Heje, Mia
    Schultz, Martin
    Plesner, Louis Lind
    Ravn, Lisbet
    Lind, Morten
    Greibe, Rasmus
    Jensen, Birgitte Nybo
    Hoi-Hansen, Thomas
    Carlson, Nicholas
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    Rasmussen, Lars S.
    Iversen, Kasper
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (02):
  • [9] Higginbottom GMA, 2013, QUAL REP, V18
  • [10] Higgs J., 2019, CLIN REASONING HLTH, P445