Comparison of response surface methods for the optimization of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket for the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater

被引:39
作者
Chollom, Martha Noro [1 ]
Rathilal, Sudesh [1 ]
Swalaha, Feroz Mohammed [2 ]
Bakare, Babatunde Femi [3 ]
Tetteh, Emmanuel Kweinor [1 ]
机构
[1] Durban Univ Technol, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Dept Chem Engn, 4001 Berea,70 Mansfield Rd, Berea, South Africa
[2] Durban Univ Technol, Fac Appl Sci, Dept Biotechnol & Food Technol, 4001 Berea,70 Mansfield Rd, Berea, South Africa
[3] Mangosuthu Univ Technol, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, 511 Griffiths Mxenge Hwy, ZA-4031 Durban, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Design expert; Optimization; Response surface methodology; Slaughterhouse wastewater; UASB REACTOR; REMOVAL; RSM; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.4491/eer.2018.366
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study was aimed at using the Central Composite Design (CCD) and Box-Behnken Design (BBD) to compare the efficiency and to elucidate the main interacting parameters in the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor, namely: Organic Loading Rate (OLR), Hydraulic Retention Times (HRT) and pH at a constant temperature of 35 degrees C. Optimum HRT (15 h), OLR (3.5 kg.m(-3).d(-1)) and pH (7) resulted in biogas production of 5,800 mL/d and COD removal of 80.8%. BBD produced a higher desirability efficiency of 94% as compared to the CCD which was 92%. The regression quadratic models developed with high R-2 values of 0.961 and 0.978 for both CCD and BBD, respectively, demonstrated that the interaction models could be used to pilot the design space. BBD model developed was more reliable with a higher prediction of biogas production (5,955.4 +/- 225.3 mL/d) and COD removal (81.5 +/- 1.014%), much dose to the experimental results at a 95% confidence level. CCD model predictions was greater in terms of COD removal (82.6 +/- 1.06% > 80.8%) and biogas production (4,636.31 mL/d +/- 439.81 < 5,800 mL/d) which was less than the experimental results. Therefore, RSM can be adapted for optimizing various wastewater treatment processes.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 122
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of semi-aerobic landfill leachate treatment using ozone [J].
Abu Amr, Salem S. ;
Aziz, Hamidi Abdul ;
Bashir, Mohammed J.K. .
Applied Water Science, 2014, 4 (03) :231-239
[2]  
Bashir M. J. K., 2015, Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, V23, P244
[3]  
Bashir MJ, 2012, 4 INT ENG C ENG 21 C
[4]   Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry [J].
Bezerra, Marcos Almeida ;
Santelli, Ricardo Erthal ;
Oliveira, Eliane Padua ;
Villar, Leonardo Silveira ;
Escaleira, Luciane Amlia .
TALANTA, 2008, 76 (05) :965-977
[5]   Treatment of an actual slaughterhouse wastewater by integration of biological and advanced oxidation processes: Modeling, optimization, and cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Bustillo-Lecompte, Ciro Fernando ;
Mehrvar, Mehrab .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 182 :651-666
[6]  
Chollom, 2017, INT J APPL ENG RES, V12, P13084
[7]  
Chollom M, 2017, 4 WAT SOC INT C 4 6
[8]   The performance enhancements of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors for domestic sludge treatment - A State-of-the-art review [J].
Chong, Siewhui ;
Sen, Tushar Kanti ;
Kayaalp, Ahmet ;
Ang, Ha Ming .
WATER RESEARCH, 2012, 46 (11) :3434-3470
[9]   Remediation of textile effluents by membrane based treatment techniques: A state of the art review [J].
Dasgupta, Jhilly ;
Sikder, Jaya ;
Chakraborty, Sudip ;
Curcio, Stefano ;
Drioli, Enrico .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 147 :55-72
[10]  
Ibrahim S., 2017, INT J ELECT COMPUT E, V7, P1522, DOI DOI 10.11591/IJECE.V7I3.PP1522-1529