Numerical assessment of the erosion risk for cavitating twisted hydrofoil by three methods

被引:22
作者
Lei, Ting-ting [1 ]
Cheng, Huai-yu [1 ]
Ji, Bin [1 ]
Peng, Xiao-xing [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] China Ship Sci Res Ctr, Natl Key Lab Ship Vibrat & Noise, Wuxi 214082, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Cavitating flow; erosion; numerical simulation; threshold selection; PREDICTION; COLLAPSE; FLOW; NEIGHBORHOOD;
D O I
10.1007/s42241-021-0061-5
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
In this paper, the large eddy simulation (LES) method in conjunction with the Zwart cavitation model is adopted for the assessment of the erosion risk on a hydrofoil surface. The numerical results are in good agreement with the experiments. On this basis, three methods, namely the intensity function method (IFM), the time-averaged aggressiveness indicators (TAIs) and the gray level method (GLM), are applied for the assessment of the erosion risk. It is shown that the erosion intensity index of the IFM is extremely sensitive to the artificially selected thresholds, which greatly limits the application of the method. The erosion risk predicted by four indicators in the TAIs does not agree well with the experimental results. Further analysis demonstrates that the GLM using the instantaneous pressure field is relatively satisfactory, which can provide a reasonable assessment of the erosion and is not very sensitive to the artificially selected thresholds. To further improve the accuracy of the GLM for the erosion risk prediction, the time-average pressure field is adopted in the GLM for the erosion evaluation. It is suggested that the erosion assessment by using the time-averaged pressure field is in better agreement with the experimental results when compared with that by using the instantaneous pressure field.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 711
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   CAVITATION IN FLUID MACHINERY AND HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES [J].
ARNDT, REA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1981, 13 :273-328
[2]   SOME REMARKS ON HYDROFOIL CAVITATION [J].
Arndt, Roger E. A. .
JOURNAL OF HYDRODYNAMICS, 2012, 24 (03) :305-314
[3]  
Bark G., 2013, International Shipbuilding Progress, V60, P345, DOI 10.3233/ISP-130097
[4]   SHOCK-INDUCED COLLAPSE OF SINGLE CAVITIES IN LIQUIDS [J].
BOURNE, NK ;
FIELD, JE .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1992, 244 :225-240
[5]  
Cao Y., 2017, 5 INT S MAR PROP ESP
[6]   A review of cavitation in tip-leakage flow and its control [J].
Cheng, Huai-yu ;
Ji, Bin ;
Long, Xin-ping ;
Huai, Wen-xin ;
Farhat, Mohamed .
JOURNAL OF HYDRODYNAMICS, 2021, 33 (02) :226-242
[7]   Numerical investigation of unsteady cavitating turbulent flows around twisted hydrofoil from the Lagrangian viewpoint [J].
Cheng, Huai-yu ;
Long, Xin-ping ;
Ji, Bin ;
Zhu, Ye ;
Zhou, Jia-jian .
JOURNAL OF HYDRODYNAMICS, 2016, 28 (04) :709-712
[8]   Development of a cavitation erosion model [J].
Dular, Matevz ;
Stoffel, Bernd ;
Sirok, Brane .
WEAR, 2006, 261 (5-6) :642-655
[9]   Observations of cavitation erosion pit formation [J].
Dular, Matevz ;
Delgosha, Olivier Coutier ;
Petkovsek, Martin .
ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 20 (04) :1113-1120
[10]   Numerical modelling of cavitation erosion [J].
Dular, Matevz ;
Coutier-Delgosha, Olivier .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2009, 61 (12) :1388-1410