Impact of biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naive men

被引:3
作者
Knaapila, Juha [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Autio, Venla [1 ,2 ]
Jambor, Ivan [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Ettala, Otto [1 ,2 ]
Verho, Janne [4 ,6 ]
Kiyiniemi, Aida [4 ,6 ]
Taimen, Pekka [7 ,8 ]
Perez, Ileana Montoya [4 ,9 ]
Aronen, Hannu J. [4 ,6 ]
Syvanen, Kari T. [1 ,2 ]
Bostrom, Peter J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Urol, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8,Rakennus 7A,2 Krs, Turku 20521, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Turku, Finland
[3] Satakunta Cent Hosp, Dept Surg, Pori, Finland
[4] Univ Turku, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Turku, Finland
[5] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[6] Turku Univ Hosp, Med Imaging Ctr Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland
[7] Univ Turku, Inst Biomed, Turku, Finland
[8] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Turku, Finland
[9] Univ Turku, Dept Future Technol, Turku, Finland
关键词
Clinically significant; prostate cancer; biparametric; magnetic resonance imaging; MRI; sensitivity; diagnostics; GRADING SYSTEM; COMPLICATIONS; PATHOLOGY; MRI;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2019.1711161
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) in men with biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lesion-targeted biopsies (TBs) to the group of men without prebiopsy MRI in an initial biopsy session. Methods: The MRI group consists of men enrolled into four prospective clinical trials investigating a biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and TB while the non-MRI group was a retrospective cohort of men collected from an era prior to a clinical use of a prostate MRI. All men had standard biopsies (SBs). In the MRI group, men had additional TBs from potential cancer-suspicious lesions. CSPCa was defined as Gleason score >= 3 + 4 in any biopsy core taken. All the patients were prostate biopsy naive. Results: The MRI group consists of 507 while the non-MRI group 379 men. Mean age and prostate specific antigen (PSA) level differed significantly (p < 0.05) between the groups: In the MRI group, 64 years and 7.6 ng/ml, respectively, and in the non-MRI group 68 years and 8.2 ng/ml, respectively. Significantly (p < 0.05) more CSPCa was diagnosed with initial biopsies in the MRI group (48%) compared to non-MRI group (34%). In men with no CSPCa diagnosed during the initial biopsies, significantly fewer (p < 0.05) men had upgrading re-biopsies in the MRI group (5%) than in the non-MRI group (19%) during the follow up. Conclusions: Prebiopsy bpMRI with TBs combined with SBs could lead to earlier diagnoses of CSPCa compared with men without prebiopsy prostate MRI used in initial PCa diagnostics.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 13
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naive Men [J].
Kim, Young Joo ;
Huh, Jung Sik ;
Park, Kyung Kgi .
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 60 (04) :346-351
[22]   Comparison of Prostate Biopsy with or without Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection: An Observational Cohort Study [J].
Bryant, Richard J. ;
Hobbs, Catherine P. ;
Eyre, Katie S. ;
Davies, Lucy C. ;
Sullivan, Mark E. ;
Shields, William ;
Sooriakumaran, Prasanna ;
Verrill, Clare L. ;
Gleeson, Fergus, V ;
MacPherson, Ruth E. ;
Hamdy, Freddie C. ;
Brewster, Simon F. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (03) :510-518
[23]   Assessing the accuracy of multiparametric MRI to predict clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naive men across racial/ethnic groups [J].
Meza, Julio ;
Babajide, Rilwan ;
Saoud, Ragheed ;
Sweis, Jamila ;
Abelleira, Josephine ;
Helenowski, Irene ;
Jovanovic, Borko ;
Eggener, Scott ;
Miller, Frank H. ;
Horowitz, Jeanne M. ;
Casalino, David D. ;
Murphy, Adam B. .
BMC UROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
[24]   Usefulness of Pre-biopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Variables to Reduce Initial Prostate Biopsy in Men with Suspected Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer [J].
Numao, Noboru ;
Yoshida, Soichiro ;
Komai, Yoshinobu ;
Ishii, Chikako ;
Kagawa, Makoto ;
Kijima, Toshiki ;
Yokoyama, Minato ;
Ishioka, Junichiro ;
Matsuoka, Yoh ;
Koga, Fumitaka ;
Saito, Kazutaka ;
Masuda, Hitoshi ;
Fujii, Yasuhisa ;
Kawakami, Satoru ;
Kihara, Kazunori .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (02) :502-508
[25]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Predictive Models for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review [J].
Triquell, Marina ;
Campistol, Miriam ;
Celma, Ana ;
Regis, Lucas ;
Cuadras, Merce ;
Planas, Jacques ;
Trilla, Enrique ;
Morote, Juan .
CANCERS, 2022, 14 (19)
[26]   Results of Targeted Biopsy in Men with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions Classified Equivocal, Likely or Highly Likely to Be Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer [J].
Venderink, Wulphert ;
van Luijtelaar, Annemarijke ;
Bomers, Joyce G. R. ;
van der Leest, Marloes ;
De Kaa, Christina Hulsbergen-van ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Sedelaar, J. P. Michiel ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 73 (03) :353-360
[27]   Impact of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate on cancer detection and treatment patterns [J].
Liu, Wen ;
Patil, Dattatraya ;
Howard, David H. ;
Moore, Renee H. ;
Wang, Heqiong ;
Sanda, Martin G. ;
Filson, Christopher P. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 37 (03) :181.e15-181.e21
[28]   Diagnostic Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Tu, Xiang ;
Liu, Zhenhua ;
Zhang, Chichen ;
Chang, Tiancong ;
Xu, He ;
Bao, Yige ;
Li, Jiakun ;
Jin, Kun ;
Yuan, Qiming ;
Qiu, Shi ;
Yang, Lu ;
Wei, Qiang .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2020, 104 (3-4) :187-198
[29]   Risk of clinically significant prostate cancer undercategorized by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Zhu, Wangshu ;
Long, Haining ;
Yu, Weibin ;
Xiong, Yijia ;
Fu, Caixia ;
Zhao, Jungong ;
Liu, Xiaohong .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2025, 50 (08) :3827-3835
[30]   Precision of multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of clinically significant Prostate Cancer [J].
Krafft, U. ;
Borkowetz, A. .
UROLOGE, 2020, 59 (01) :72-77