The Firepower Sweep Test: A novel approach to cookstove laboratory testing

被引:23
作者
Bilsback, Kelsey R. [1 ]
Eilenberg, Sarah R. [2 ]
Good, Nicholas [3 ]
Heck, Lauren [4 ]
Johnson, Michael [5 ]
Kodros, John K. [6 ]
Lipsky, Eric M. [2 ,7 ]
L'Orange, Christian [1 ]
Pierce, Jeffrey R. [6 ]
Robinson, Allen L. [2 ]
Subramanian, R. [2 ]
Tryner, Jessica [1 ]
Wilson, Ander [4 ]
Volckens, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Environm & Radiol Hlth Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Colorado State Univ, Dept Stat, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[5] Berkeley Air Monitoring Grp, Berkeley, CA USA
[6] Colorado State Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[7] Penn State Greater Allegheny, Dept Mech Engn, Mckeesport, PA USA
关键词
cookstoves; firepower; indoor air pollution; laboratory emissions testing; residential solid fuel; water boiling test; EMISSION FACTORS; COOKING STOVES; POLLUTANT EMISSIONS; BIOMASS COOKSTOVES; OPTICAL-PROPERTIES; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; SIMPLIFIED MODEL; FUEL TYPE; PERFORMANCE; HOUSEHOLD;
D O I
10.1111/ina.12497
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Emissions from solid-fuel cookstoves have been linked to indoor and outdoor air pollution, climate forcing, and human disease. Although task-based laboratory protocols, such as the Water Boiling Test (WBT), overestimate the ability of improved stoves to lower emissions, WBT emissions data are commonly used to benchmark cookstove performance, estimate indoor and outdoor air pollution concentrations, estimate impacts of stove intervention projects, and select stoves for large-scale control trials. Multiple-firepower testing has been proposed as an alternative to the WBT and is the basis for a new standardized protocol (ISO 19867-1:2018); however, data are needed to assess the value of this approach. In this work, we (a) developed a Firepower Sweep Test [FST], (b) compared emissions from the FST, WBT, and in-home cooking, and (c) quantified the relationship between firepower and emissions using correlation analysis and linear model selection. Twenty-three stove-fuel combinations were evaluated. The FST reproduced the range of PM2.5 and CO emissions observed in the field, including high emissions events not typically observed under the WBT. Firepower was modestly correlated with emissions, although the relationship varied between stove-fuel combinations. Our results justify incorporating multiple-firepower testing into laboratory-based protocols but demonstrate that firepower alone cannot explain the observed variability in cookstove emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:936 / 949
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] A simplified model for understanding natural convection driven biomass cooking stoves-Part 2: With cook piece operation and the dimensionless form
    Agenbroad, Joshua
    DeFoort, Morgan
    Kirkpatrick, Allan
    Kreutzer, Cory
    [J]. ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 15 (02) : 169 - 175
  • [2] A simplified model for understanding natural convection driven biomass cooking stoves-Part 1: Setup and baseline validation
    Agenbroad, Joshua
    DeFoort, Morgan
    Kirkpatrick, Allan
    Kreutzer, Cory
    [J]. ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 15 (02) : 160 - 168
  • [3] [Anonymous], ATMOS CHEM PHYS DISC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, The Water Boiling Test Version 4.2.3
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, IND CLEAN STOV IN PI
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2008, GEN SPEC BIOM HOUS S
  • [7] A review of chronological development in cookstove assessment methods: Challenges and way forward
    Arora, Pooja
    Jain, Suresh
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 55 : 203 - 220
  • [8] Radiative forcing from household fuel burning in Asia
    Aunan, Kristin
    Berntsen, Terje K.
    Myhre, Gunnar
    Rypdal, Kristin
    Streets, David G.
    Woo, Jung-Hun
    Smith, Kirk R.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (35) : 5674 - 5681
  • [9] Bailis R., 2007, Energy for Sustainable Development, VXI, P57, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60400-7
  • [10] Comparison of five rural, wood-burning cooking devices: Efficiencies and emissions
    BallardTremeer, G
    Jawurek, HH
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1996, 11 (05) : 419 - 430