The Future Direction of the Adult Heart Allocation System in the United States

被引:111
作者
Meyer, D. M. [1 ]
Rogers, J. G. [2 ]
Edwards, L. B. [3 ]
Callahan, E. R. [3 ]
Webber, S. A. [4 ]
Johnson, M. R. [5 ]
Vega, J. D. [6 ]
Zucker, M. J. [7 ]
Cleveland, J. C., Jr. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Cardiovasc & Thorac Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] United Network Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Med, Madison, WI USA
[6] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[7] Newark Beth Israel Med Ctr, Dept Med, Newark, NJ USA
[8] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Denver, CO USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ethics and public policy; heart transplantation; cardiology; organ procurement and allocation; organ allocation; United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS); TRANSPLANTATION; TIME; NETWORK; SUPPORT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1111/ajt.13030
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Ensuring equitable and fair organ allocation is a central charge of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) as the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) through its contract with the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). The OPTN/UNOS Board initiated a reassessment of the current allocation system. This paper describes the efforts of the OPTN/UNOS Heart Subcommittee, acting on behalf of the OPTN/UNOS Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee, to modify the current allocation system. The Subcommittee assessed the limitations of the current three-tiered system, outcomes of patients with status exceptions, emerging ventricular assist device (VAD) population, options for improved geographic sharing and status of potentially disenfranchised groups. They analyzed waiting list and posttransplant mortality rates of a contemporary cohort of patient groups at risk, in collaboration with the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to develop a proposed multi-tiered allocation scheme. This proposal provides a framework for simulation modeling to project whether candidates would have better waitlist survival in the revised allocation system, and whether posttransplant survival would remain stable. The tiers are subject to change, based on further analysis by the Heart Subcommittee and will lead to the development of a more effective and equitable heart allocation system. The Thoracic Committee of the United Network for Organ Sharing is proposing a revised, multi-tier heart allocation scheme in the United States that is designed to improve priority stratification based primarily upon contemporary waitlist mortality risk. Also see editorial by Barr and Taylor (page ) and meeting report by Kobashigawa et al (page ).
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 54
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Heart allocation and transplantation in Switzerland since the introduction of the Swiss Organ Allocation System (SOAS)
    Weiss, Julius
    Beyeler, Franziska
    Immer, Franz F.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2014, 144
  • [42] Geographic Disparities in Liver Allocation and Distribution in the United States: Where Are We Now?
    Spaggiari, Mario
    Okoye, Obi
    Tulla, Kiara
    Di Cocco, Pierpaolo
    Almario, Jorge
    Benedetti, E.
    Tzvetanov, Ivo
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2019, 51 (10) : 3205 - 3212
  • [43] A national assessment of one-year heart outcomes after the 2018 adult heart allocation change
    Bradbrook, Keighly
    Goff, Rebecca R.
    Lindblad, Kelsi
    Daly, Richard C.
    Hall, Shelley
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 42 (02) : 196 - 205
  • [44] Trends and outcomes of patients with adult congenital heart disease and pulmonary hypertension listed for orthotopic heart transplantation in the United States
    Krishnamurthy, Yamini
    Cooper, Lauren B.
    Lu, Di
    Schroder, Jacob N.
    Daneshmand, Mani A.
    Rogers, Joseph G.
    Milano, Carmelo A.
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Patel, Chetan B.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (05) : 619 - 624
  • [45] Total artificial heart implantation as a bridge to transplantation in the United States
    Itagaki, Shinobu
    Toyoda, Nana
    Egorova, Natalia
    Sun, Erick
    Lee, Timothy
    Boateng, Percy
    Gibson, Gregory
    Moss, Noah
    Mancini, Donna
    Adams, David H.
    Anyanwu, Anelechi C.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 167 (01)
  • [46] Variation of heart transplant rates in the United States during holidays
    Grodin, Justin L.
    Ayers, Colby R.
    Thibodeau, Jennifer T.
    Mishkin, Joseph D.
    Mammen, Pradeep P. A.
    Markham, David W.
    Drazner, Mark H.
    Patel, Parag C.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 28 (08) : 877 - 882
  • [47] Exception Status Listing in the New Adult Heart Allocation System A New Solution to an Old Problem?
    Topkara, Veli K.
    Clerkin, Kevin J.
    Fried, Justin A.
    Griffin, Jan
    Raikhelkar, Jayant
    Lee, Sun Hi
    Latif, Farhana
    Habal, Marlena
    Horn, Evelyn
    Farr, Maryjane A.
    Takada, Koji
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Jorde, Ulrich P.
    Sayer, Gabriel
    Uriel, Nir
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2021, 14 (06) : E007916
  • [48] Changes in waitlist and posttransplant outcomes in patients with adult congenital heart disease after the new heart transplant allocation system
    Kainuma, Atsushi
    Ning, Yuming
    Kurlansky, Paul A.
    Wang, Amy S.
    Axom, Kelly
    Farr, Maryjane
    Sayer, Gabriel
    Uriel, Nir
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Takeda, Koji
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 35 (11)
  • [49] The New Adult Heart Allocation Policy A Work in Progress
    Colvin, Monica M.
    Mancini, Donna M.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2020, 13 (10): : E007000
  • [50] Early trends in cardiac allograft vasculopathy after implementation of the 2018 donor heart allocation policy in the United States
    Tehrani, David M.
    Kim, Juka S.
    Hsu, Jeffrey J.
    Nsair, Ali
    Khush, Kiran K.
    Fearon, William F.
    Parikh, Rushi, V
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 254 : 23 - 29