The Future Direction of the Adult Heart Allocation System in the United States

被引:113
作者
Meyer, D. M. [1 ]
Rogers, J. G. [2 ]
Edwards, L. B. [3 ]
Callahan, E. R. [3 ]
Webber, S. A. [4 ]
Johnson, M. R. [5 ]
Vega, J. D. [6 ]
Zucker, M. J. [7 ]
Cleveland, J. C., Jr. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Cardiovasc & Thorac Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] United Network Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Med, Madison, WI USA
[6] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[7] Newark Beth Israel Med Ctr, Dept Med, Newark, NJ USA
[8] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Denver, CO USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ethics and public policy; heart transplantation; cardiology; organ procurement and allocation; organ allocation; United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS); TRANSPLANTATION; TIME; NETWORK; SUPPORT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1111/ajt.13030
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Ensuring equitable and fair organ allocation is a central charge of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) as the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) through its contract with the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). The OPTN/UNOS Board initiated a reassessment of the current allocation system. This paper describes the efforts of the OPTN/UNOS Heart Subcommittee, acting on behalf of the OPTN/UNOS Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee, to modify the current allocation system. The Subcommittee assessed the limitations of the current three-tiered system, outcomes of patients with status exceptions, emerging ventricular assist device (VAD) population, options for improved geographic sharing and status of potentially disenfranchised groups. They analyzed waiting list and posttransplant mortality rates of a contemporary cohort of patient groups at risk, in collaboration with the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to develop a proposed multi-tiered allocation scheme. This proposal provides a framework for simulation modeling to project whether candidates would have better waitlist survival in the revised allocation system, and whether posttransplant survival would remain stable. The tiers are subject to change, based on further analysis by the Heart Subcommittee and will lead to the development of a more effective and equitable heart allocation system. The Thoracic Committee of the United Network for Organ Sharing is proposing a revised, multi-tier heart allocation scheme in the United States that is designed to improve priority stratification based primarily upon contemporary waitlist mortality risk. Also see editorial by Barr and Taylor (page ) and meeting report by Kobashigawa et al (page ).
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 54
页数:11
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Transplant Registrants With Implanted Left Ventricular Assist Devices Have Insufficient Risk to Justify Elective Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Status 1A Time [J].
Dardas, Todd ;
Mokadam, Nahush A. ;
Pagani, Francis ;
Aaronson, Keith ;
Levy, Wayne C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (01) :36-43
[2]   SynCardia Temporary Total Artificial Heart as Bridge to Transplantation: Current Results at La Pitie Hospital [J].
Kirsch, Matthias E. W. ;
Nguyen, Anthony ;
Mastroianni, Ciro ;
Pozzi, Matteo ;
Leger, Philippe ;
Nicolescu, Michaela ;
Varnous, Shaida ;
Pavie, Alain ;
Leprince, Pascal .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 95 (05) :1640-1646
[3]   Stable patients on left ventricular assist device support have a disproportionate advantage: Time to re-evaluate the current UNOS policy [J].
Moazami, Nader ;
Sun, Benjamin ;
Feldman, David .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 30 (09) :971-974
[4]  
OPTN/UNOS, 2013, GUID REG AD HEART ST
[5]   Timing Isn't Everything: Donor Heart Allocation in the Present LVAD Era [J].
Pinney, Sean P. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (01) :52-53
[6]  
Prashant NM, 2013, EUR J CARDIO-THORAC, V44, pe310
[7]   Analytical approaches for transplant research, 2004 [J].
Schaubel, DE ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Murray, S ;
Ashby, VB ;
McCullough, KP ;
Dickinson, DM ;
Hulbert-Shearon, TE ;
Webb, RL ;
Wolfe, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (04) :950-957
[8]   Is it time for a cardiac allocation score? First results from the Eurotransplant pilot study on a survival benefit-based heart allocation [J].
Smits, Jacqueline M. ;
de Vries, Erwin ;
De Pauw, Michel ;
Zuckermann, Andreas ;
Rahmel, Axel ;
Meiser, Bruno ;
Laufer, Guenther ;
Reichenspurner, Hermann ;
Strueber, Martin .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 32 (09) :873-880
[9]   The urgent priority for transplantation is to trim the waiting list [J].
Stevenson, Lynne Warner .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 32 (09) :861-867
[10]   Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Transplant Candidates Supported With Mechanical Circulatory Support Is Reappraisal of the Current United Network for Organ Sharing Thoracic Organ Allocation Policy Justified? [J].
Wever-Pinzon, Omar ;
Drakos, Stavros G. ;
Kfoury, Abdallah G. ;
Nativi, Jose N. ;
Gilbert, Edward M. ;
Everitt, Melanie ;
Alharethi, Rami ;
Brunisholz, Kim ;
Bader, Feras M. ;
Li, Dean Y. ;
Selzman, Craig H. ;
Stehlik, Josef .
CIRCULATION, 2013, 127 (04) :452-462