Ecogeographic variation of body size in the spectacled salamanders (Salamandrina): influence of genetic structure and local factors

被引:23
作者
Romano, Antonio [1 ]
Ficetola, Gentile Francesco [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Biol, I-00133 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Environm Sci, I-20126 Milan, Italy
关键词
Amphibians; Bergmann's rule; body size; ecogeographical variation; haplotype; Italy; local factors; mitochondrial DNA; Salamandridae; Salamandrina; FOLLOW BERGMANNS RULE; INFORMATION-THEORETIC APPROACH; PERSPICILLATA SAVI; LIFE-HISTORY; TERDIGITATA BONNATERRE; TRITURUS-CARNIFEX; NORTH-AMERICA; AMPHIBIANS; PATTERNS; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02369.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim The patterns and causes of ecogeographical body size variation in ectotherms remain controversial. In amphibians, recent genetic studies are leading to the discovery of many cryptic species. We analysed the relationships between body size and climate for a salamander (Salamandrina) that was recently separated into two sibling species, to evaluate how ignoring interspecific and intraspecific genetic structure may affect the conclusions of ecogeographical studies. We also considered the potential effects of factors acting at a local scale. Location Thirty-four populations covering the whole range of Salamandrina, which is endemic to peninsular Italy. Methods We pooled original data and data from the literature to obtain information on the snout-vent length (SVL) of 3850 Salamandrina females; we obtained high-resolution climatic data from the sampled localities. We used an information-theoretic approach to evaluate the roles of climate, genetic features (mitochondrial haplogroup identity) and characteristics of aquatic oviposition sites. We repeated our analyses three times: in the first analysis we ignored genetic data on intraspecific and interspecific variation; in the second one we considered the recently discovered differences between the two sibling species; in the third one we included information on intraspecific genetic structure within Salamandrina perspicillata (for Salamandrina terdigitata the sample size was too small to perform intraspecific analyses). Results If genetic information was ignored, our analysis suggested the existence of a relationship between SVL and climatic variables, with populations of large body size in areas with high precipitation and high thermal range. If species identity was included in the analysis, the role of climatic features was much weaker. When intraspecific genetic differences were also considered, no climatic feature had an effect. In all analyses, local factors were important and explained a large proportion of the variation; populations spawning in still water had a larger body size. Main conclusions An imperfect knowledge of species boundaries, or overlooking the intraspecific genetic variation can strongly affect the results of analyses of body size variation. Furthermore, local factors can be more important than the large-scale parameters traditionally considered, particularly in species with a small range.
引用
收藏
页码:2358 / 2370
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Geographic body size variation in the periodical cicadas Magicicada: implications for life cycle divergence and local adaptation
    Koyama, T.
    Ito, H.
    Kakishima, S.
    Yoshimura, J.
    Cooley, J. R.
    Simon, C.
    Sota, T.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2015, 28 (06) : 1270 - 1277
  • [32] Genetic basis for body size variation between an anadromous and two derived lacustrine populations of threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus in southwest Alaska
    Bowles, Ella
    Johnston, Rebecca A.
    Vanderzwan, Stevi L.
    Rogers, Sean M.
    CURRENT ZOOLOGY, 2016, 62 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [33] Age Structure and Body Size Variation in Common Toad (Bufo bufo, Linnaeus 1758) from Three Different Altitudes in Turkey
    Kalayci, Tugba Ergul
    Gul, Serkan
    Dursun, Cantekin
    Karaoglu, Handan
    Ozdemir, Nurhayat
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2019, 50 (04) : 397 - 403
  • [34] Geographical variation in song frequency and structure: the effects of vicariant isolation, habitat type and body size
    Koetz, Anna H.
    Westcott, David A.
    Congdon, Bradley C.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2007, 74 : 1573 - 1583
  • [35] Body Shape Variation and Population Genetic Structure of Rhoadsia altipinna (Characidae: Rhoadsiinae) in Southwestern Ecuador
    Aguirre, Windsor E.
    Navarrete, Ronald
    Malato, Grace
    Calle, Paola
    Loh, Maxine K.
    Vital, Webster F.
    Valadez, Grecia
    Vu, Vinh
    Shervette, Virginia R.
    Granda, Juan C.
    COPEIA, 2016, 104 (02) : 554 - 569
  • [36] Influence of life-history variation on the genetic structure of two sympatric salamander taxa
    Steele, C. A.
    Baumsteiger, J.
    Storfer, Andrew
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2009, 18 (08) : 1629 - 1639
  • [37] Juvenile fishes in macrophyte beds: influence of food resources, habitat structure and body size
    Grenouillet, G
    Pont, D
    JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2001, 59 (04) : 939 - 959
  • [38] Habitat-linked genetic structure for white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys): Local factors shape population genetic structure
    Welke, Catherine A.
    Graham, Brendan
    Conover, Ross R.
    Rivers, James W.
    Burg, Theresa M.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (17): : 11700 - 11717
  • [39] The proximate sources of genetic variation in body size plasticity: The relative contributions of feeding behaviour and development in Drosophila melanogaster
    Chakraborty, Avishikta
    Sgro, Carla M.
    Mirth, Christen K.
    JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 135
  • [40] Isolation, small population size, and management influence inbreeding and reduced genetic variation in K'gari dingoes
    Miller, Susan M.
    Behrendorff, Linda
    Allen, Benjamin L.
    Andrew, Rose L.
    Ballard, Guy
    Ballard, J. William O.
    Cairns, Kylie M.
    Conroy, Gabriel C.
    Fleming, Peter J. S.
    Grueber, Catherine E.
    Oakey, Jane
    Smith, Deane A.
    Stephens, Danielle
    Wade, Claire
    Bishop, Jacqueline M.
    CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2024, 25 (04) : 955 - 971