Open and closed knowledge sourcing Their effect on innovation performance in small and medium enterprises

被引:24
作者
Ham, Juyeon [1 ]
Choi, Byounggu [2 ]
Lee, Jae-Nam [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Business Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Kookmin Univ, Coll Business Adm, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Business Sch, MIS, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
SMEs; Complementarity; Open innovation; Knowledge sourcing approach; Substitutability; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; FIRM PERFORMANCE; HIGH-TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; COMPLEMENTARITIES; CAPABILITIES; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1108/IMDS-08-2016-0338
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose - Many studies have investigated the relationship between the adoption of open innovation and performance in large firms. However, limited research is available with regard to the use of open innovation in small and medium enterprises (SMEs). SMEs are important because of their contribution to innovation in almost all economies. The purpose of this paper is to extend the current literature by focusing on SMEs. Using complementarity and knowledge-based theories, this study develops three hypotheses to identify the effect of knowledge sourcing approaches for innovation on SMEs' innovation performance. Design/methodology/approach - Surveys collected from 196 SMEs in Korea were analyzed using the supermodularity function to test the hypotheses. Findings - Results indicate that an external knowledge-oriented approach has no significant effect, whereas an internal knowledge-oriented (i.e. closed) approach has a positive effect on innovation performance. Interestingly, this study found that open innovation has a negative effect on SMEs' innovation performance (i.e. both internal knowledge-oriented and external knowledge-oriented approaches have a substitutive relationship). Originality/value - This study sheds new light on open innovation and knowledge management research by identifying the relationship between knowledge sourcing approaches for innovation, and innovation performance in SMEs. Practical implications highlight that open innovation could impede SMEs' innovation performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1166 / 1184
页数:19
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   Benefiting from external knowledge? A study of telecommunications industry cluster in Shenzhen, China [J].
Ai, Chi-Han ;
Wu, Hung-Che .
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2016, 116 (04) :622-645
[2]   Review:: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems:: Conceptual foundations and research issues [J].
Alavi, M ;
Leidner, DE .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (01) :107-136
[3]   A measurement scale for product innovation performance [J].
Alegre, Joaquin ;
Lapiedra, Rafael ;
Chiva, Ricardo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2006, 9 (04) :333-+
[4]   Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? [J].
Almeida, P ;
Dokko, G ;
Rosenkopf, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (02) :301-315
[5]   OPEN VERSUS CLOSED INNOVATION: A MODEL OF DISCOVERY AND DIVERGENCE [J].
Almirall, Esteve ;
Casadesus-Masanell, Ramon .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 35 (01) :27-47
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Interaction effects in multiple regression
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SME ENTR OUTL
[8]   Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: A note [J].
Arora, A .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1996, 50 (01) :51-55
[9]  
Athey S, 1998, 6600 NAT BUR EC RES
[10]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120