共 50 条
PROVISION OF CLIMATE SERVICES FOR AGRICULTURE Public and Private Pathways to Farm Decision-Making
被引:31
|作者:
Haigh, Tonya
[1
]
Koundinya, Vikram
[2
,3
]
Hart, Chad
[4
]
Klink, Jenna
[5
]
Lemos, Maria
[6
]
Mase, Amber Saylor
[7
]
Prokopy, Linda
[8
]
Singh, Ajay
[9
]
Todey, Dennis
[10
]
Widhalm, Melissa
[11
]
机构:
[1] Univ Nebraska, Natl Drought Mitigat Ctr, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Human Ecol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Cooperat Extens, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Iowa State Univ, Dept Econ, Ames, IA USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Program Support Serv, Madison, WI USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Environm Resources Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[8] Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, Lafayette, IN USA
[9] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Dept Environm Studies, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
[10] ARS, Natl Lab Agr & Environm, USDA, Ames, IA USA
[11] Purdue Univ, Purdue Climate Change Res Ctr, Lafayette, IN USA
基金:
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词:
INFORMATION;
ADVISERS;
PERCEPTIONS;
MANAGEMENT;
USABILITY;
CAPACITY;
WEATHER;
SCIENCE;
D O I:
10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0253.1
中图分类号:
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号:
0706 ;
070601 ;
摘要:
The pathways between climate information producers and agricultural decision-makers are evolving and becoming more complex, with information increasingly flowing through both public and for-profit intermediaries and organizations. This study characterizes the various channels of climate information flow, as well as the needs and preferences of information intermediaries and end users. We use data from a 2016 survey of farmers and agricultural advisors in 12 U.S. Corn Belt states to evaluate perceptions of climate information and its usability. Our findings reinforce the view that much weather and climate information is not reaching farmers explicitly but also suggest that farmers may not be aware of the extent to which the information is packaged with seed, input, or management recommendations. For farmers who are using weather and climate information, private services such as subscription and free tools and applications (apps) are as influential as publicly provided services. On the other hand, we find that agricultural advisors are engaged users and transformers of both public and private sources of weather/climate information and that they choose sources of information based on qualities of salience and credibility. Our results suggest that climate information providers could improve the use of information in agriculture by engaging advisors and farmers as key stakeholders and by strategically employing multiple delivery pathways through the private and public sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:1781 / 1790
页数:10
相关论文