PROVISION OF CLIMATE SERVICES FOR AGRICULTURE Public and Private Pathways to Farm Decision-Making

被引:31
|
作者
Haigh, Tonya [1 ]
Koundinya, Vikram [2 ,3 ]
Hart, Chad [4 ]
Klink, Jenna [5 ]
Lemos, Maria [6 ]
Mase, Amber Saylor [7 ]
Prokopy, Linda [8 ]
Singh, Ajay [9 ]
Todey, Dennis [10 ]
Widhalm, Melissa [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Natl Drought Mitigat Ctr, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Human Ecol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Cooperat Extens, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Iowa State Univ, Dept Econ, Ames, IA USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Program Support Serv, Madison, WI USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Environm Resources Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[8] Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, Lafayette, IN USA
[9] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Dept Environm Studies, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
[10] ARS, Natl Lab Agr & Environm, USDA, Ames, IA USA
[11] Purdue Univ, Purdue Climate Change Res Ctr, Lafayette, IN USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
INFORMATION; ADVISERS; PERCEPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; USABILITY; CAPACITY; WEATHER; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0253.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The pathways between climate information producers and agricultural decision-makers are evolving and becoming more complex, with information increasingly flowing through both public and for-profit intermediaries and organizations. This study characterizes the various channels of climate information flow, as well as the needs and preferences of information intermediaries and end users. We use data from a 2016 survey of farmers and agricultural advisors in 12 U.S. Corn Belt states to evaluate perceptions of climate information and its usability. Our findings reinforce the view that much weather and climate information is not reaching farmers explicitly but also suggest that farmers may not be aware of the extent to which the information is packaged with seed, input, or management recommendations. For farmers who are using weather and climate information, private services such as subscription and free tools and applications (apps) are as influential as publicly provided services. On the other hand, we find that agricultural advisors are engaged users and transformers of both public and private sources of weather/climate information and that they choose sources of information based on qualities of salience and credibility. Our results suggest that climate information providers could improve the use of information in agriculture by engaging advisors and farmers as key stakeholders and by strategically employing multiple delivery pathways through the private and public sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:1781 / 1790
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Identifying climate service production constraints to adaptation decision-making in Sweden
    Ernst, Kathleen M.
    Swartling, Asa Gerger
    Andre, Karin
    Preston, Benjamin L.
    Klein, Richard J. T.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2019, 93 : 83 - 91
  • [22] Development of the PHAST model: generating standard public health services data and evidence for decision-making
    Bekemeier, Betty
    Park, Seungeun
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 25 (04) : 428 - 434
  • [23] Feminization of African Agriculture and the Meaning of Decision-Making for Empowerment and Sustainability
    Haug, Ruth
    Mwaseba, Dismas L.
    Njarui, Donald
    Moeletsi, Mokhele
    Magalasi, Mufunanji
    Mutimura, Mupenzi
    Hundessa, Feyisa
    Aamodt, Julie T.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (16)
  • [24] Recognising ignorance in decision-making Strategies for a more sustainable agriculture
    Rivera-Ferre, Marta G.
    Ortega-Cerda, Miquel
    EMBO REPORTS, 2011, 12 (05) : 393 - 397
  • [25] Processes of adaptation in farm decision-making models. A review
    Robert, Marion
    Thomas, Alban
    Bergez, Jacques-Eric
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 36 (04)
  • [26] Decision-making and resilience in agriculture: improving awareness of the role of accounting
    Tingey-Holyoak, Joanne Louise
    Wheeler, Sarah Ann
    Seidl, Constantin
    MEDITARI ACCOUNTANCY RESEARCH, 2023, 31 (06) : 1735 - 1756
  • [27] The combination of climate information services in the decision-making process of farmers to reduce climate risks: Application of social cognition theory
    Savari, Moslem
    Zhoolideh, Milad
    Limuie, Mohammad
    CLIMATE SERVICES, 2024, 35
  • [28] DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTIONS IN CHILE, BASED ON THE DATA
    Pizarro-Ubilla, Enrique
    Villasana, Pedro L.
    COMUNIDAD Y SALUD, 2019, 17 (02) : 41 - 47
  • [29] Ecosystem Services: Delivering Decision-Making for Salt Marshes
    zu Ermgassen, Philine S. E.
    Baker, Ronald
    Beck, Michael W.
    Dodds, Kate
    zu Ermgassen, Sophus O. S. E.
    Mallick, Debbrota
    Taylor, Matthew D.
    Turner, R. Eugene
    ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2021, 44 (06) : 1691 - 1698
  • [30] Exploring the effect of risk and benefit information provision on vaccination decision-making
    Mostafapour, Mehrnaz
    Meyer, Samantha B.
    Scholer, Abigail
    VACCINE, 2019, 37 (44) : 6750 - 6759