PROVISION OF CLIMATE SERVICES FOR AGRICULTURE Public and Private Pathways to Farm Decision-Making

被引:31
|
作者
Haigh, Tonya [1 ]
Koundinya, Vikram [2 ,3 ]
Hart, Chad [4 ]
Klink, Jenna [5 ]
Lemos, Maria [6 ]
Mase, Amber Saylor [7 ]
Prokopy, Linda [8 ]
Singh, Ajay [9 ]
Todey, Dennis [10 ]
Widhalm, Melissa [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Natl Drought Mitigat Ctr, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Human Ecol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Cooperat Extens, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Iowa State Univ, Dept Econ, Ames, IA USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Program Support Serv, Madison, WI USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Environm Resources Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[8] Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, Lafayette, IN USA
[9] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Dept Environm Studies, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
[10] ARS, Natl Lab Agr & Environm, USDA, Ames, IA USA
[11] Purdue Univ, Purdue Climate Change Res Ctr, Lafayette, IN USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
INFORMATION; ADVISERS; PERCEPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; USABILITY; CAPACITY; WEATHER; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0253.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The pathways between climate information producers and agricultural decision-makers are evolving and becoming more complex, with information increasingly flowing through both public and for-profit intermediaries and organizations. This study characterizes the various channels of climate information flow, as well as the needs and preferences of information intermediaries and end users. We use data from a 2016 survey of farmers and agricultural advisors in 12 U.S. Corn Belt states to evaluate perceptions of climate information and its usability. Our findings reinforce the view that much weather and climate information is not reaching farmers explicitly but also suggest that farmers may not be aware of the extent to which the information is packaged with seed, input, or management recommendations. For farmers who are using weather and climate information, private services such as subscription and free tools and applications (apps) are as influential as publicly provided services. On the other hand, we find that agricultural advisors are engaged users and transformers of both public and private sources of weather/climate information and that they choose sources of information based on qualities of salience and credibility. Our results suggest that climate information providers could improve the use of information in agriculture by engaging advisors and farmers as key stakeholders and by strategically employing multiple delivery pathways through the private and public sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:1781 / 1790
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A global meta-analysis of climate services and decision-making in agriculture
    Born, Lorna
    Prager, Steven
    Ramirez-Villegas, Julian
    Imbach, Pablo
    CLIMATE SERVICES, 2021, 22
  • [2] Political Decision-making and the Local Provision of Public Goods: The Case of Municipal Climate Protection in the US
    Krause, Rachel M.
    URBAN STUDIES, 2012, 49 (11) : 2399 - 2417
  • [3] Assessing stakeholder climate data needs for farm-level decision-making in the US Corn Belt
    Clark, Suzanna
    Wolfinger, J. Felix
    Kenney, Melissa A.
    Gerst, Michael D.
    Roop, Heidi A.
    GEOSCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2023, 6 (01) : 27 - 38
  • [4] Climate Decision-Making
    Orlove, Ben
    Shwom, Rachael
    Markowitz, Ezra
    Cheong, So-Min
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 45, 2020, 45 : 271 - 303
  • [5] Leadership and decision-making practices in public versus private universities in Pakistan
    Zulfqar, A.
    Valcke, M.
    Devos, G.
    Tuytens, M.
    Shahzad, A.
    ASIA PACIFIC EDUCATION REVIEW, 2016, 17 (01) : 147 - 159
  • [6] The development of a farmer decision-making mind map to inform climate services in Central America
    Giraldo, Diana
    Clarkson, Graham
    Dorward, Peter
    Obando, Diego
    Ramirez-Villegas, Julian
    FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2023, 5
  • [7] Services for What and for Whom? A Literature Review of Private Forest Owners' Decision-Making in Relation to Forest-Based Services
    Matilainen, Anne
    Andersson, Elias
    Laehdesmaeki, Merja
    Lidestav, Gun
    Kurki, Sami
    SMALL-SCALE FORESTRY, 2023, 22 (03) : 511 - 535
  • [8] To build or not to build? Mobilization of uncertainty arguments in public decision-making on private megaprojects
    Peda, Peeter
    Vinnari, Eija
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC BUDGETING ACCOUNTING & FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 34 (06) : 235 - 262
  • [9] Climate extremes and risks: links between climate science and decision-making
    Sillmann, Jana
    Raupach, Timothy H.
    Findell, Kirsten L.
    Donat, Markus
    Alves, Lincoln M.
    Alexander, Lisa
    Borchert, Leonard
    de Amorim, Pablo Borges
    Buontempo, Carlo
    Fischer, Erich M.
    Franzke, Christian L.
    Guan, Bin
    Haasnoot, Marjolijn
    Hawkins, Ed
    Jacob, Daniela
    Mahon, Roche
    Maraun, Douglas
    Morrison, Monica A.
    Poschlod, Benjamin
    Ruane, Alex C.
    Shampa
    Stephenson, Tannecia
    van der Wel, Narelle
    Wang, Zhuo
    Zhang, Xuebin
    Zupanic, Josipa
    FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2024, 6
  • [10] Impact of temperature humidity index-based climate services for Murrah buffaloes of India on operational decision-making and economic outcome of the farm
    Manjunath, K. V.
    Maiti, Sanjit
    Garai, Sanchita
    Reddy, D. Anilkumar
    Bhakat, Mukesh
    Aggarwal, Anjali
    Mondal, Goutam
    CLIMATE SERVICES, 2024, 36