A Nomogram to Predict for Malignant Diagnosis of BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions

被引:8
|
作者
Mazouni, Chafika [1 ]
Sneige, Nour [2 ]
Rouzier, Roman [3 ]
Balleyguier, Corinne [4 ]
Bevers, Therese [5 ]
Andre, Fabrice [1 ]
Vielh, Philippe [1 ]
Delaloge, Suzette [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Gustave Roussy, Dept Breast Oncol, F-94805 Villejuif, France
[2] Hop Tenon, Dept Pathol, F-75970 Paris, France
[3] Hop Tenon, Dept Breast Oncol, F-75970 Paris, France
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Canc Prevent Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
breast cancer; BI-RADS; 4; fine-needle aspiration; mammography; nomogram; CANCER RISK; GAIL MODEL; WOMEN; CHEMOTHERAPY; MAMMOGRAPHY; CYTOLOGY; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1002/jso.21616
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: BI-RADS Category classification is the most powerful predictor of breast cancer (BC). However, BI-RADS Category 4 lesions are associated with a highly variable rate of BC. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram for the prediction of individual probability of BC in patients with BI-RADS Category 4 lesions. Methods: The study included all patients with BI-RADS Category 4 lesions at screening mammogram, who underwent diagnostic cytology or biopsy and, as needed, surgery or follow-up. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to develop the model and build the nomogram. This nomogram was evaluated on a training set of 170 patients treated at IGR Cancer Center, Paris, France. Nomogram performance was evaluated on an external independent dataset of 188 patients from MDA Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Results: A total of 51(28.5%) patients in the training set and 73 (42.4%) patients in the validation set were diagnosed with BC. The final, most informative, nomogram included information on patient age (P = 0.04), palpable tumor (P = 0.002), menopausal status (P = 0.32), lesion size (P = 0.81), HRT (P = 0.09), and Gail risk (P = 0.58). The predictive accuracy of the nomogram was 0.716, respectively. The concordance index of the model was 0.66 in the validation set. Conclusion: The nomogram based on clinical and radiological findings may help inform the patients before surgical explorations, to decrease the number of missed cancer cases but currently cannot replace FNA or biopsy. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010;102:220-224. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 224
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combining Potential Strain Elastography and Radiomics for Diagnosing Breast Lesions in BI-RADS 4: Construction and Validation a Predictive Nomogram
    Zha, Hailing
    Wu, Tingting
    Zhang, Manqi
    Cai, Mengjun
    Diao, Xuehong
    Li, Fang
    Wu, Rong
    Du, Yu
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (08) : 3106 - 3116
  • [2] Role of elastography for downgrading BI-RADS category 4a breast lesions according to risk factors
    Koh, Jieun
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Kim, Min Jung
    Yoon, Jung Hyun
    Park, Vivian Youngjean
    Moon, Hee Jung
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2019, 60 (03) : 278 - 285
  • [3] MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast
    Gökalp, G
    Topal, U
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 57 (03) : 436 - 444
  • [4] Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions
    Nicholson, Brandi T.
    LoRusso, Alexander P.
    Smolkin, Mark
    Bovbjerg, Viktor E.
    Petroni, Gina R.
    Harvey, Jennifer A.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2006, 13 (09) : 1143 - 1149
  • [5] Elastography for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: a Useful Tool for Small and BI-RADS 4 Lesions
    Liu, Xue-Jing
    Zhu, Ying
    Liu, Pei-Fang
    Xu, Yi-Lin
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (24) : 10739 - 10743
  • [6] BI-RADS® category 3 lesions on mammogram
    Amor, Mariem Ben Haj
    Boulanger, Thomas
    Ben Miled, Aicha
    Brochet, Julien
    Bridault, Jean-Philippe
    Ceugnart, Luc
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2022, 32 (2-3) : 42 - 48
  • [7] Can Ultrasound Elastography Help Better Manage Mammographic BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions?
    Gu, Yang
    Tian, Jiawei
    Ran, Haitao
    Ren, Weidong
    Chang, Cai
    Yuan, Jianjun
    Kang, Chunsong
    Deng, Youbin
    Wang, Hui
    Luo, Baoming
    Guo, Shenglan
    Zhou, Qi
    Xue, Ensheng
    Zhan, Weiwei
    Zhou, Qing
    Li, Jie
    Zhou, Ping
    Zhang, Chunquan
    Chen, Man
    Gu, Ying
    Xu, Jinfeng
    Chen, Wu
    Zhang, Yuhong
    Li, Jianchu
    Wang, Hongyan
    Jiang, Yuxin
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2022, 22 (04) : E407 - E416
  • [8] Value of the US BI-RADS final assessment following mastectomy: BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions
    Gweon, Hye Mi
    Son, Eun Ju
    Youk, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Jeong-Ah
    Chung, Jin
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2012, 53 (03) : 255 - 260
  • [9] Can Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prevent Biopsy or Change the Management of BI-RADS® Category 4 Breast Lesions?
    Turnaoglu, Hale
    Ozturk, Emine
    Yucesoy, Cuneyt
    Teber, Mehmet Akif
    Turan, Aynur
    Ozbalci, Aysu Basak
    Seker, Ebru Gaye
    Onal, Binnur
    Hekimoglu, Baki
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 80 (05) : 505 - 512
  • [10] Dedicated breast PET value to evaluate BI-RADS 4 breast lesions
    Grana-Lopez, L.
    Herranz, M.
    Dominguez-Prado, I
    Argibay, S.
    Villares, A.
    Ruibal, A.
    Vazquez-Caruncho, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 108 : 201 - 207