共 10 条
Implementing community-based Dried Blood Spot (DBS) testing for HIV and hepatitis C: a qualitative analysis of key facilitators and ongoing challenges
被引:6
|作者:
Young, James
[1
,2
]
Ablona, Aidan
[1
]
Klassen, Benjamin J.
[1
]
Higgins, Rob
[1
,3
]
Kim, John
[4
]
Lavoie, Stephanie
[4
]
Knight, Rod
[5
,6
]
Lachowsky, Nathan J.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Community Based Res Ctr, 1007-808 Nelson St, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2H2, Canada
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, 8888 Univ Dr, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
[3] Univ Victoria, Sch Publ Hlth & Social Policy, 3800 Finnerty Rd, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada
[4] Publ Hlth Agcy Canada, Natl Microbiol Lab, 1015 Arlington St, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3R2, Canada
[5] British Columbia Ctr Substance Use, Providence Hlth Care, 400-1045 Howe St, Providence, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada
[6] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med, Fac Med, 317-2194 Hlth Sci Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T IZ3, Canada
关键词:
HIV Testing;
HCV Testing;
Dried blood spot;
Community setting;
Implementation Research;
PREVALENCE;
MSM;
D O I:
10.1186/s12889-022-13525-x
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Background In 2018, the Community-Based Research Centre (CBRC) invited gay, bisexual, trans, queer men and Two-Spirit and non-binary people (GBT2Q) at Pride Festivals across Canada to complete in-person Sex Now surveys and provide optional dried blood spot (DBS) samples screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). As there is a lack of research evaluating the implementation of DBS sampling for GBT2Q in community settings, we aimed to evaluate this intervention, identifying key facilitators and ongoing challenges to implementing community-based DBS screening for HIV/HCV among GBT2Q. Methods We conducted sixteen one-on-one interviews with individuals involved with the community-based DBS collection protocol, including research staff, site coordinators, and volunteer DBS collectors. Most individuals involved with DBS collection were "peers" (GBT2Q-identified). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided our data collection and analysis. Results Interviewees felt that DBS collection was a low-barrier, cost-effective, and simple way for peers to quickly screen a large number of Sex Now respondents. Interviewees also noted that the community and peer-based aspects of the research helped drive recruitment of Sex Now respondents. Most interviewees felt that the provision of results took too long, and that some Sex Now respondents would have preferred to receive their test results immediately (e.g., rapid or point-of-care testing). Conclusion Peer-based DBS sampling can be an effective and relatively simple way to screen GBT2Q at Pride Festivals for more than one sexually transmitted and blood borne infection.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文