SF-6Dv2 preference value set for health utility in food allergy

被引:10
作者
Dufresne, Elise [1 ]
Poder, Thomas G. [2 ,3 ]
Samaan, Kathryn [4 ]
Lacombe-Barrios, Jonathan [4 ]
Paradis, Louis [1 ,4 ]
Des Roches, Anne [4 ]
Begin, Philippe [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Management Evaluat & Hlth Policy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Inst Univ Sante Mentale Montreal, Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Ctr Hosp Univ St Justine, Dept Pediat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
cost-benefit analysis; food allergy; health utilities; quality of life; quality-adjusted life-year; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DYAD APPROACH; CHILDREN; VALUATION; PATIENT; STATES; FAMILIES; OUTCOMES; PARENTS; QALYS;
D O I
10.1111/all.14444
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background The lack of a value set allowing the calculation of QALY is an important limitation when establishing the value of emerging therapies to treat food allergy. The aim of this study was to develop a Short-Form Six-Dimension version 2 (SF-6Dv2) preference value set for the calculation of health utility from the Canadian food-allergic population. Methods Two hundred ninety-five parents of patients aged 0-17 years old and 154 patients aged 12 years old and above with food allergy were recruited in clinic and online. Participants were asked to complete a self-administered online questionnaire including generic health-related quality of life questionnaires. Various health states described by the SF-6Dv2 were valued with time-trade-off and discrete choice experiments. Data from elicitation techniques were combined using the hybrid regression model. Results A total of 241 parents and 125 patients performed 3904 time-trade-off and 5112 discrete choice experiments. Utility decrements were estimated for each level of each SF-6Dv2 dimension. Utility values calculated based on the validated preference set were in average 0.15 lower (95%CI: 0.12-0.18) and were poorly correlated (R-2 = 0.46) with those derived from the EQ-5D-5L generic questionnaire in the same cohort. Conclusion A representative preference value set for patients with food allergy was determined using the SF-6Dv2 generic questionnaire. This adapted preference set will contribute to improve the validity of future utility estimates in this population for the appraisal of upcoming potentially impactful but sometimes costly therapies.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 338
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Using a personalized measure (Patient Generated Index (PGI)) to identify what matters to people with cancer [J].
Aburub, Ala' S. ;
Gagnon, B. ;
Rodriguez, A. M. ;
Mayo, Nancy E. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (01) :437-445
[2]   Assessment of health status and quality of life outcomes for children with asthma [J].
Annett, RD .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 107 (05) :S473-S481
[3]   Implications of spillover effects within the family for medical cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Basu, A ;
Meltzer, D .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 24 (04) :751-773
[4]   A Time Tradeoff Method for Eliciting Partner's Quality of Life due to Patient's Health States in Prostate Cancer [J].
Basu, Anirban ;
Dale, William ;
Elstein, Arthur ;
Meltzer, David .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2010, 30 (03) :355-365
[5]   Parents' and caregivers' experiences and behaviours when eating out with children with a food hypersensitivity [J].
Begen, Fiona M. ;
Barnett, Julie ;
Barber, Miriam ;
Payne, Ros ;
Gowland, M. Hazel ;
Lucas, Jane S. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 18
[6]   The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 [J].
Brazier, J ;
Roberts, J ;
Deverill, M .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (02) :271-292
[7]   A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups [J].
Brazier, J ;
Roberts, J ;
Tsuchiya, A ;
Busschbach, J .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (09) :873-884
[8]   US Valuation of the SF-6D [J].
Craig, Benjamin M. ;
Pickard, A. Simon ;
Stolk, Elly ;
Brazier, John E. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2013, 33 (06) :793-803
[9]   The psychosocial impact of food allergy and food hypersensitivity in children, adolescents and their families: a review [J].
Cummings, A. J. ;
Knibb, R. C. ;
King, R. M. ;
Lucas, J. S. .
ALLERGY, 2010, 65 (08) :933-945
[10]   Limits to health care: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers [J].
Daniels, N ;
Sabin, J .
PHILOSOPHY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 1997, 26 (04) :303-350