Reprint of Low-energy electron potentiometry

被引:0
|
作者
Jobst, Johannes [1 ,2 ]
Kautz, Jaap [1 ]
Mytiliniou, Maria [1 ]
Tromp, Rudolf M. [1 ,3 ]
van der Molen, Sense Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Huygens Kamerlingh Onnes Lab, POB 9504, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Phys, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] IBM TJ Watson Res Ctr, 1101 Kitchawan Rd,POB 218, Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 USA
关键词
Low-energy electron microscopy; LEEM; Potentiometry; Work function; Transport properties; SURFACE PHASE-TRANSITIONS; VOLTAGE CONTRAST; MICROSCOPY; SILICON; JUNCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.10.009
中图分类号
TH742 [显微镜];
学科分类号
摘要
In a lot of systems, charge transport is governed by local features rather than being a global property as suggested by extracting a single resistance value. Consequently, techniques that resolve local structure in the electronic potential are crucial for a detailed understanding of electronic transport in realistic devices. Recently, we have introduced a new potentiometry method based on low-energy electron microscopy (LEEM) that utilizes characteristic features in the reflectivity spectra of layered materials [1]. Performing potentiometry experiments in LEEM has the advantage of being fast, offering a large field of view and the option to zoom in and out easily, and of being non-invasive compared to scanning-probe methods. However, not all materials show clear features in their reflectivity spectra. Here we, therefore, focus on a different version of low-energy electron potentiometry (LEEP) that uses the mirror mode transition, i.e. the drop in electron reflectivity around zero electron landing energy when they start to interact with the sample rather than being reflected in front of it. This transition is universal and sensitive to the local electrostatic surface potential (either workfunction or applied potential). It can consequently be used to perform LEEP experiments on a broader range of material compared to the method described in Ref [1]. We provide a detailed description of the experimental setup and demonstrate LEEP on workfunction-related intrinsic potential variations on the Si(111) surface and for a metal-semiconductor-metal junction with external bias applied. In the latter, we visualize the Schottky effect at the metal-semiconductor interface. Finally, we compare how robust the two LEEP techniques discussed above are against image distortions due to sample inhomogeneities or contamination. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 14
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low-energy electron potentiometry
    Jobst, Johannes
    Kautz, Jaap
    Mytiliniou, Maria
    Tromp, Rudolf M.
    van der Molen, Sense Jan
    ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2017, 181 : 74 - 80
  • [2] Low-Energy Electron Potentiometry: Contactless Imaging of Charge Transport on the Nanoscale
    Kautz, J.
    Jobst, J.
    Sorger, C.
    Tromp, R. M.
    Weber, H. B.
    van der Molen, S. J.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [3] Low-Energy Electron Potentiometry: Contactless Imaging of Charge Transport on the Nanoscale
    J. Kautz
    J. Jobst
    C. Sorger
    R. M. Tromp
    H. B. Weber
    S. J. van der Molen
    Scientific Reports, 5
  • [4] LOW-ENERGY ELECTRON AND LOW-ENERGY POSITRON HOLOGRAPHY
    TONG, SY
    HUANG, H
    GUO, XQ
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1992, 69 (25) : 3654 - 3657
  • [5] Low-energy electron therapy
    Léon Sanche
    Nature Materials, 2015, 14 : 861 - 863
  • [6] LOW-ENERGY ELECTRON DIFFRACTION
    GERMER, LH
    PHYSICS TODAY, 1964, 17 (07) : 19 - 23
  • [7] LOW-ENERGY ELECTRON DIFFRACTION
    MACRAE, AU
    SCIENCE, 1963, 139 (355) : 379 - &
  • [8] Low-energy electron microscopy
    Tromp, RM
    IBM JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 44 (04) : 503 - 516
  • [9] Low-energy electron diffraction
    Sakama, H
    Ichikawa, N
    JOURNAL OF JAPANESE SOCIETY OF TRIBOLOGISTS, 2005, 50 (08) : 607 - 611
  • [10] LOW-ENERGY SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPY COMBINED WITH LOW-ENERGY ELECTRON-DIFFRACTION
    ICHINOKAWA, T
    ISHIKAWA, Y
    KEMMOCHI, M
    IKEDA, N
    HOSOKAWA, Y
    KIRSCHNER, J
    SURFACE SCIENCE, 1986, 176 (1-2) : 397 - 414