Offset Risk Minimization for Open-loop Optimal Control of Oil Reservoirs

被引:2
|
作者
Capolei, A. [1 ,2 ]
Christiansen, L. H. [1 ,2 ]
Jorgensen, J. B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Appl Math & Comp Sci, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Ctr Energy Resources Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2017年 / 50卷 / 01期
关键词
Optimal control; Model-based control; Production control; Risk; Stochastic modelling; PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1034
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Simulation studies of oil field water flooding have demonstrated a significant potential of optimal control technology to improve industrial practices. However, real-life applications are challenged by unknown geological factors that make reservoir models highly uncertain. To minimize the associated financial risks, the oil literature has used ensemble based methods to manipulate the net present value (NPV) distribution by optimizing sample estimated risk measures. In general, such methods successfully reduce overall risk. However, as this paper demonstrates, ensemble-based control strategies may result in individual profit outcomes that perform worse than real-life dominating strategies. This poses significant financial risks to oil companies whose main concern is to avoid unacceptable low profits. To remedy this, this paper proposes offset risk mimimization. Unlike existing methodology, the offset method uses the NPV offset distribution to minimize risk relative to a competing reference strategy. Open-loop simulations of a 3D two-phase synthetic reservoir demonstrate the potential of offset risk minimization to significantly improve the worst case profit offset relative to real life best practices. The results suggest that it may be more relevant to consider the NPV offset distribution than the NPV distribution when minimizing risk in production optimization. (C) 2017, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10620 / 10625
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Closed-loop Control from Data-Driven Open-Loop Optimal Control Trajectories
    Pellegrino, Felice Andrea
    Blanchini, Franco
    Fenu, Gianfranco
    Salvato, Erica
    2022 EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC), 2022, : 1379 - 1384
  • [32] Optimal Open-Loop MIMO Precoder Design
    Li, Gen
    Mishra, Deepak
    Hao, Li
    Ma, Zheng
    Larsson, Erik G.
    IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, 2020, 24 (09) : 2075 - 2079
  • [33] Asymptotically optimal open-loop load balancing
    Anselmi, Jonatha
    QUEUEING SYSTEMS, 2017, 87 (3-4) : 245 - 267
  • [34] OPEN-LOOP CONTROL OF A STEREOTACTIC DEVICE
    MEYERWAA.K
    SCHLEICH.A
    PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1973, 339 : R81 - R81
  • [35] Asymptotically optimal open-loop load balancing
    Jonatha Anselmi
    Queueing Systems, 2017, 87 : 245 - 267
  • [36] DEVELOPMENT TRENDS IN OPEN-LOOP CONTROL
    KALTENECKER, H
    SINN, G
    SIEMENS ZEITSCHRIFT, 1977, 51 (09): : 683 - 688
  • [37] OPEN-LOOP TRANSVERSAL EQUALIZER OF OPTIMAL LENGTH
    RUTTER, MJ
    COWAN, CFN
    ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 1983, 19 (06) : 208 - 210
  • [38] Optimal open-loop and feedback control using single gimbal control moment gyroscopes
    Hoelscher, Brian R., 1600, American Astronautical Soc, San Diego, CA, United States (42):
  • [39] ON THE EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN OPTIMAL STOCHASTIC-CONTROL AND OPEN-LOOP FEEDBACK-CONTROL
    GESSING, R
    JACOBS, OLR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1984, 40 (01) : 193 - 200
  • [40] Cheapest open-loop identification for control
    Bombois, X
    Scorletti, G
    Gevers, A
    Hildebrand, R
    Van den Hof, P
    2004 43RD IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), VOLS 1-5, 2004, : 382 - 387