The Safety and Efficacy of Peripheral Vascular Procedures Performed in the Outpatient Setting

被引:0
|
作者
Oskui, Peyman Mesbah [1 ,2 ]
Kloner, Robert A. [2 ,4 ]
Burstein, Steven [3 ,5 ,8 ]
Zhiroff, Katrine [3 ,8 ]
Kartub, Benjamin Richard [6 ]
Economides, Christina [3 ,8 ]
Brook, Jenny [7 ]
Mayeda, Guy S. [3 ,5 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
[2] Good Samaritan Hosp, Heart Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Good Samaritan Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Cardiol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[5] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[8] Calif CardioVasc Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90017 USA
关键词
interventional cardiology; peripheral interventions; outpatient angioplasty; venous intervention; ANGIOPLASTY; ACCESS; OFFICE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of peripheral vascular interventions performed in a private, outpatient catheterization laboratory. Background. Peripheral vascular interventions have been traditionally performed in the inpatient setting. However, there has been a recent shift away from hospital-based vascular interventions toward outpatient-based procedures. Data are scarce on the efficacy and safety of such procedures being performed in the outpatient setting. Methods. We performed a retrospective chart review of the first 500 consecutive procedures that were performed at an outpatient catheterization laboratory from February 2012 through February 2013. We separated the procedures into arteriovenous fistula (AVF)-related procedures, peripheral arterial disease (PAD)-related procedures, and miscellaneous procedures. The primary endpoint was procedure success rate, defined as postintervention residual stenosis of <30% on angiography. The secondary endpoint was procedure-related adverse events. Results. The success rate for AVF-related interventions was 90%, and 93% when including partially successful interventions. The success rate for PAD-related interventions was 82%, and 92% when including partially successful interventions. The procedure success rate for miscellaneous interventions was 89%. Five AVF-related procedures suffered an adverse event (1.49%). Two PAD-related procedures suffered an adverse event (1.3%), while no adverse events were noted among miscellaneous procedures. One patient required immediate postprocedure hospitalization due to iliac artery perforation. Conclusion. Peripheral vascular procedures performed in the outpatient setting are safe and effective. A comparison of outcomes between outpatient and inpatient facilities when performing similar peripheral vascular interventions is needed in order to determine whether a transition of further vascular procedures into an outpatient setting is justified.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Costs and Budget Impact of Collagen-Based Vascular Closure Device Versus Manual Compression Following Peripheral Endovascular Procedures
    Goueffic, Yann
    McWilliams, Richard
    Burton, Hannah
    Verin, Nathalie
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 93 : 64 - 70
  • [32] An analysis of carotid artery stenting procedures performed in New York and Florida (2005-2006): Procedure indication, stroke rate, and mortality rate are equivalent for vascular surgeons and non-vascular surgeons
    Steppacher, Robert
    Csikesz, Nicholas
    Eslami, Mohammad
    Arous, Elias
    Messina, Louis
    Schanzer, Andres
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 49 (06) : 1379 - 1386
  • [33] FEMOSEAL CLOSE: multi-centre observational study with FemoSeal™ vascular closure device following peripheral percutaneous endovascular procedures
    Goueffic, Yann
    Deloose, Koen
    Dubosq, Maxime
    Zeller, Thomas
    CVIR ENDOVASCULAR, 2025, 8 (01)
  • [34] Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Ketamine for Acute Pain Management in the Emergency Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Seak, Yee Sin
    Nor, Junainah
    Tuan Kamauzaman, Tuan Hairulnizam
    Arithra, Ariff
    Islam, Md Asiful
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (17)
  • [35] Safety Net Care and Midlevel Dental Practitioners: A Case Study of the Portion of Care That Might Be Performed Under Various Setting and Scope-of-Practice Assumptions
    Phillips, Elizabeth
    Gwozdek, Anne E.
    Shaefer, H. Luke
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 105 (09) : 1770 - 1776
  • [36] Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease Using Injectable Biomaterials and Drug-Coated Balloons: Safety and Efficacy Perspective
    Qamar, Safi Ur Rehman
    Spahic, Lemana
    Benolic, Leo
    Zivanovic, Marko
    Filipovic, Nenad
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [37] Device profile of the FLEX Vessel Prep System for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease: overview of its safety and efficacy
    Zeller, Thomas
    Boehme, Tanja
    Beschorner, Ulrich
    Noory, Elias
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2022, 19 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [38] Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Bivalirudin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Percutaneous Peripheral Intervention A Single-Center Experience
    Sheikh, Imran R.
    Ahmed, S. Hinan
    Mori, Naoyo
    Gupta, Anjan
    Mewissen, Mark
    Allaqaband, Suhail
    Bajwa, Tanvir
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (09) : 871 - 876
  • [39] Peripheral placement of apheresis catheters in children: Feasibility, safety, and efficacy in the collection of blood stem cells - Initial experience
    Harned, RK
    Kelly, SS
    Foreman, NK
    Giller, RH
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (01) : 294 - 298
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of implantable vascular support in the treatment of arteriovenous fistula: A single-arm meta-analyses
    Li, Xuanwei
    Ma, Congyuan
    Li, Wenlai
    Li, Yue
    Zhang, Meng
    Zhu, Ping
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2025, 26 (02) : 422 - 431