The Safety and Efficacy of Peripheral Vascular Procedures Performed in the Outpatient Setting

被引:0
|
作者
Oskui, Peyman Mesbah [1 ,2 ]
Kloner, Robert A. [2 ,4 ]
Burstein, Steven [3 ,5 ,8 ]
Zhiroff, Katrine [3 ,8 ]
Kartub, Benjamin Richard [6 ]
Economides, Christina [3 ,8 ]
Brook, Jenny [7 ]
Mayeda, Guy S. [3 ,5 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
[2] Good Samaritan Hosp, Heart Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Good Samaritan Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Cardiol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[5] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[8] Calif CardioVasc Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90017 USA
关键词
interventional cardiology; peripheral interventions; outpatient angioplasty; venous intervention; ANGIOPLASTY; ACCESS; OFFICE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of peripheral vascular interventions performed in a private, outpatient catheterization laboratory. Background. Peripheral vascular interventions have been traditionally performed in the inpatient setting. However, there has been a recent shift away from hospital-based vascular interventions toward outpatient-based procedures. Data are scarce on the efficacy and safety of such procedures being performed in the outpatient setting. Methods. We performed a retrospective chart review of the first 500 consecutive procedures that were performed at an outpatient catheterization laboratory from February 2012 through February 2013. We separated the procedures into arteriovenous fistula (AVF)-related procedures, peripheral arterial disease (PAD)-related procedures, and miscellaneous procedures. The primary endpoint was procedure success rate, defined as postintervention residual stenosis of <30% on angiography. The secondary endpoint was procedure-related adverse events. Results. The success rate for AVF-related interventions was 90%, and 93% when including partially successful interventions. The success rate for PAD-related interventions was 82%, and 92% when including partially successful interventions. The procedure success rate for miscellaneous interventions was 89%. Five AVF-related procedures suffered an adverse event (1.49%). Two PAD-related procedures suffered an adverse event (1.3%), while no adverse events were noted among miscellaneous procedures. One patient required immediate postprocedure hospitalization due to iliac artery perforation. Conclusion. Peripheral vascular procedures performed in the outpatient setting are safe and effective. A comparison of outcomes between outpatient and inpatient facilities when performing similar peripheral vascular interventions is needed in order to determine whether a transition of further vascular procedures into an outpatient setting is justified.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety and Efficacy of the StarClose Vascular Closure Device in More Than 1000 Consecutive Peripheral Angioplasty Procedures
    Spiliopoulos, Stavros
    Katsanos, Konstantinos
    Karnabatidis, Dimitris
    Diamantopoulos, Athanasios
    Nikolaos, Christeas
    Siablis, Dimitris
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2011, 18 (03) : 435 - 443
  • [2] Safety and efficacy of the Mynx Control vascular closure device in peripheral arterial procedures: A prospective study
    Diamantopoulos, Athanasios
    Nourzaie, Romman
    Mulholland, Doug
    Dolan, Steven G.
    Ahmed, Irfan
    Gkoutzios, Panos
    Thulasidasan, Narayanan
    Theodoulou, Iakovos
    Sabharwal, Tarun
    VASCULAR, 2023, 31 (02) : 369 - 374
  • [3] Effectiveness and safety of dialysis vascular access procedures performed by interventional nephrologists
    Beathard, GA
    Litchfield, T
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 66 (04) : 1622 - 1632
  • [4] Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of Infrapopliteal Endovascular Procedures Performed in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia According to the Society for Vascular Surgery Objective Performance Goals
    Varela, Cesar
    Acin, Francisco
    Lopez de Maturana, Ignacio
    de Haro, Joaquin
    Bleda, Silvia
    Paz, Belky
    Esparza, Leticia
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 28 (02) : 284 - 294
  • [5] THE ROLE OF HYBRID PROCEDURES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
    Balaz, P.
    Rokosny, S.
    Bafrnec, J.
    Bjorck, M.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 101 (04) : 232 - 237
  • [6] PERIPHERAL VASCULAR COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING CORONARY INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES
    NASSER, TK
    MOHLER, ER
    WILENSKY, RL
    HATHAWAY, DR
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 18 (11) : 609 - 614
  • [7] Safety and efficacy study of the wound care 360° SiteSeal® vascular closure device in percutaneous cardiac catheterization procedures
    Sharma, Suresh
    Patel, Nilay
    Jeevanantham, Vinodh
    Gupta, Kamal
    Earnest, Matthew B.
    VASCULAR, 2021, 29 (02) : 228 - 236
  • [8] Safety and effectiveness of vascular closure devices in interventional radiological procedures
    Kim, Esther
    Sebastiao, Bruno Goncalves
    Lee, Amy
    Ande, Sudharshan
    Shankar, Jai
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2023, 29 (05) : 525 - 531
  • [9] Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Vascular Closure Device in Neurointerventional Procedures
    Taha, Ammar
    Walsh, Ellen K.
    Wright, Kathryn A.
    Ahmed, Iftikhar
    Supakul, Nucharin
    Awwad, Eric E.
    Tejada, Juan G.
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2013, 19 (03) : 353 - 358
  • [10] Age modifies the efficacy and safety of carotid artery revascularization procedures
    Nejim, Besma
    Alshwaily, Widian
    Dakour-Aridi, Hanaa
    Locham, Satinderjit
    Goodney, Philip
    Malas, Mahmoud B.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 69 (05) : 1490 - 1503