An interactive website for analytical method comparison and bias estimation

被引:24
作者
Bahar, Burak [1 ]
Tuncel, Ayse F.
Holmes, Earle W. [2 ]
Holmes, Daniel T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Lab Med, 20 York St,PS-329, New Haven, CT 06519 USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
Method comparison; Clinical chemistry; R programming; Shiny; Website; REGRESSION PROCEDURES; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.08.008
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: Regulatory standards mandate laboratories to perform studies to ensure accuracy and reliability of their test results. Method comparison and bias estimation are important components of these studies. Design & methods: We developed an interactive website for evaluating the relative performance of two analytical methods using R programming language tools. The website can be accessed at https://bahar.shinyapps.io/method_compare/. Results: The site has an easy-to-use interface that allows both copy-pasting and manual entry of data. It also allows selection of a regression model and creation of regression and difference plots. Available regression models include Ordinary Least Squares, Weighted-Ordinary Least Squares, Deming, Weighted-Deming, Passing-Bablok and Passing-Bablok for large datasets. The server processes the data and generates downloadable reports in PDF or HTML format. Conclusions: Our website provides clinical laboratories a practical way to assess the relative performance of two analytical methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1029
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Allaire J., 2017, DYNAMIC DOCUMENTS R
[2]  
Altman D. G., 1990, Practical Statistics for medical research, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429258589
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 15189 ISO
[4]   COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087
[5]  
Bland JM, 1999, STAT METHODS MED RES, V8, P135, DOI 10.1177/096228029900800204
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]  
Carpenter J, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P1141, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000515)19:9<1141::AID-SIM479>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-F
[9]  
Carstensen B., 2013, FUNCTIONS ANAL AGREE
[10]  
Chang W., 2016, CREATE DASHBOARDS SH