Characteristics of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in patients with cochlear nerve canal stenosis receiving cochlear implants

被引:5
作者
Wang, Zhenxiao [1 ]
Liu, Yun [1 ]
Wang, Line [1 ]
Shen, Xixi [1 ]
Han, Shuguang [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Gao, Fenqi [1 ]
Liang, Wenqi [1 ]
Peng, Kevin A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Friendship Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 95th Yongan Rd, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China
[2] House Clin, 2100 W 3rd St,Suite 111, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
关键词
Cochlear nerve canal stenosis (CNCs); Cochlear implantation (CI); Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR); Cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT); CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.10.029
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore the characteristics of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR) in children with cochlear nerve canal stenosis (CNCs) following cochlear implantation (CI), and the EABR thresholds in children with stenotic versus normal cochlear nerve canals. Method: Sixteen children with profound sensorineural hearing loss were included in this study: 8 with CNCs (CNCs group) and 8 with normal cochlear nerve canals (control group). All children underwent cochlear implantation with full insertion of all electrodes. EABR was performed 6 months postoperatively in both groups. Results: The EABR extraction rate was 100% in children with normal cochlear nerve canals and only 50% in children with CNCs. EABR thresholds were significantly higher in children with CNCs of electrodes No. 11 and 22 than in children with normal cochlear nerve canals (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). There was no significant difference in EABR thresholds among electrode No. 1, 11 and 22 in CNCs group (P > 0.05 for all comparisons); while in the control group, the EABR threshold at electrode No 22 was lower than those at both electrodes No. 11 and 1 (P < 0.05 for both comparisons), and the EABR threshold at electrode No. 11 was also lower than that at electrode No. 1 (P < 0.05). Conclusion The EABR thresholds in children with normal cochlear nerve canals vary according to the different locations of electrodes in the cochlea; while in children with CNCs, there was no significant difference among different electrode locations. The EABR thresholds in CNCs children were higher than those of children with normal cochlear nerve canals at electrode 11 and 22.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 103
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Correlation between cortical auditory evoked potential and auditory speech performance in children with cochlear implants
    Wang, Xuetong
    Lin, Zhihan
    Guo, Ying
    Liu, Yidi
    Zhou, Xin
    Bai, Jie
    Liu, Haihong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 172
  • [22] Hearing habilitation with auditory brainstem implantation in two children with cochlear nerve aplasia
    Colletti, V
    Fiorino, F
    Sacchetto, L
    Miorelli, V
    Carner, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2001, 60 (02) : 99 - 111
  • [23] Assessing the applications of cortical auditory evoked potentials as a biomarker in children with cochlear implants
    Mostafa I.Z.
    Shabana M.I.
    El Shennawy A.M.
    Weheiba H.M.
    The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 2013, 29 (4) : 263 - 268
  • [24] Investigating the Recovery Properties of Auditory Nerve Fibres at Different Cochlear Regions using Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential
    Umashankar, Abishek
    Jayachandran, Deepika
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2020, 14 (10)
  • [25] Hearing Restoration in Cochlear Nerve Deficiency: the Choice Between Cochlear Implant or Auditory Brainstem Implant, a Meta-analysis
    Vesseur, Annemarie
    Free, Rolien
    Snels, Chantal
    Dekker, Friedo
    Mylanus, Emmanuel
    Verbist, Berit
    Frijns, Johan
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2018, 39 (04) : 428 - 437
  • [26] Intra- and postoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds in children with cochlear implants
    Baysal, Elif
    Karatas, Erkan
    Deniz, Murat
    Baglam, Tekin
    Durucu, Cengiz
    Karatas, Zeynel Abidin
    Mumbuc, Semih
    Kanlikama, Muzaffer
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 76 (05) : 649 - 652
  • [27] Validation of direct recording of electrically evoked cortical auditory evoked potentials through a cochlear implant system
    Bell-Souder, Don
    Chen, Chen
    Spahr, Anthony
    Sharma, Anu
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [28] A Comparison of Electroaudiometry (EAM) and Electrically Evoked Brainstem Response (EABR) with the Cochlear Implantation Hearing Results
    Battelino, Saba
    Gros, Anton
    Butinar, Dusan
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2009, 5 (01) : 100 - 103
  • [29] Exploring the relationship between electrophysiological measures of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and speech perception outcomes post-cochlear implantation
    Chen, Zhongyan
    Bi, Qingling
    Lv, Yong
    Liu, Yang
    Tian, Yuanyuan
    Liu, Jianfeng
    Yang, Wenjing
    Zhou, Yukun
    Huang, Weiluo
    Li, Yuan
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2025, : 3005 - 3017
  • [30] Analysis of Speech Perception Outcomes Among Patients Receiving Cochlear Implants With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder
    Dean, Clare
    Felder, Gabriel
    Kim, Ana H.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2013, 34 (09) : 1610 - 1614