Measures and models of personality and their effects on communication and team performance

被引:16
作者
Macht, Gretchen A. [1 ]
Nembhard, David A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Team performance; Communication; Personality; Agreeableness; Neuroticism; JOB-PERFORMANCE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2015.05.006
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The importance of teams and their impact on the contemporary workplace cannot be overstated. Many studies have been conducted to point to specific relevant factors related to team performance. None- theless, there remains relatively little that is known about the mechanisms and interactions that lead to high performing teams. In this study we consider communication (a key feature of teamwork) as a potentially mediating factor between each aspect of human personality (as measured by the Five Factor Model) and team performance. This exploratory study sheds further light on how personalities affect teams via communication, using a structural equation modeling approach. Results indicate that at least one team measure of extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism, and openness is moderated by communication in influencing team performance. Relevance to industry: This research can aid managers on the relative importance of personality metrics on team performance, as well as the nature of the relationships among these metrics. This has the potential to improve organizational performance and reinforces the need for communication in fostering teamwork. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 89
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Communication and trust are key: Unlocking the relationship between leadership and team performance and creativity
    Boies, Kathleen
    Fiset, John
    Gill, Harjinder
    LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2015, 26 (06) : 1080 - 1094
  • [42] Effects of Team Emotional Authenticity on Virtual Team Performance
    Connelly, Catherine E.
    Turel, Ofir
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [43] The impact of computer-based procedures on team performance, communication, and situation awareness
    Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe
    Hsieh, Tsung-Ling
    Yang, Chih-Wei
    Huang, Ren-Jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2016, 51 : 21 - 29
  • [44] Team Role Stress: Relationships With Team Learning and Performance in Project Teams
    Savelsbergh, Chantal
    Gevers, Josette M. P.
    van der Heijden, Beatrice I. J. M.
    Poell, Rob F.
    GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 37 (01) : 67 - 100
  • [45] Getting groups to develop good strategies:: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models
    Gurtner, Andrea
    Tschan, Franziska
    Semmer, Norbert K.
    Naegele, Christof
    ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2007, 102 (02) : 127 - 142
  • [46] How Personality Traits are interrelated with Team Climate and Team Performance in Software Engineering? A Preliminary Study
    Soomro, Arjumand Bano
    Salleh, Norsaremah
    Nordin, Azlin
    2015 9TH MALAYSIAN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (MYSEC2015), 2015, : 259 - 265
  • [47] The joint effects of personality and job scope on in-role performance, citizenship behaviors, and creativity
    Raja, Usman
    Johns, Gary
    HUMAN RELATIONS, 2010, 63 (07) : 981 - 1005
  • [48] The Effects of Empirical Keying of Personality Measures on Faking and Criterion-Related Validity
    Cucina, Jeffrey M.
    Vasilopoulos, Nicholas L.
    Su, Chihwei
    Busciglio, Henry H.
    Cozma, Irina
    DeCostanza, Arwen H.
    Martin, Nicholas R.
    Shaw, Megan N.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 34 (03) : 337 - 356
  • [49] Structuring for team success: The interactive effects of network structure and cultural diversity on team potency and performance
    Troester, Christian
    Mehra, Ajay
    van Knippenberg, Daan
    ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2014, 124 (02) : 245 - 255
  • [50] Relationship between Interprofessional Communication and Team Task Performance
    Lee, Kyeong Ryong
    Kim, Eun Jung
    CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2020, 43 : 44 - 50