Environmental Tax Policy in Romania in the Context of the EU: Double Dividend Theory

被引:52
作者
Radulescu, Magdalena [1 ]
Sinisi, Crenguta Ileana [1 ]
Popescu, Constanta [2 ]
Iacob, Silvia Elena [3 ]
Popescu, Luigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pitesti, Fac Econ & Law, Bd Republ 71, Arges 110062, Romania
[2] Univ Valahia Targoviste, Doctoral Sch, Fac Econ, Str Aleea Sinaia 13, Targoviste 130004, Dambovita, Romania
[3] Acad Econ Studies, Fac Theoret & Appl Econ, Calea Dorobanti 15-17,Sect 1, Bucharest 010552, Romania
关键词
environmental taxes; Growth Domestic Product (GDP) growth; unemployment; greenhouse CO2 emissions; Romania; EU area; KUZNETS CURVE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; CARBON TAXES; COUNTRIES; EMISSIONS; REFORM;
D O I
10.3390/su9111986
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the last decade, environment protection gained much more significance in designing the economic policies in the European Union (EU) countries. There are many economic and policy differences between the European countries, despite of the harmonization process inside the EU area. The path of implementation of the environmental tax reforms in the EU countries differs greatly from one country to another and the effects of such taxation in the economic and environmental areas are manifold. The authors of this paper have agreed to undertake the task of testing the double dividend hypothesis of the environmental taxation in Romania (an energy-intensive country) versus the EU area as a whole, using Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) techniques and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimations. Our findings show that this hypothesis is validated neither in Romania (in the economic growth area) nor in the EU area as a whole (in the unemployment area). Therefore, Romania cannot increase the level of the environmental tax for supporting economic growth, but it can grant environmental subsidies for decreasing the emissions and supporting the economic growth. This could be achieved by expanding the tax labor base and by collecting higher budgetary revenues to sustain such environmental subsidies. As far as the EU area is concerned, it is a necessary measure to continue the descending trend for the labor taxation to achieve the goal of improving the employment rate.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Andersen M. S., 2009, CARBON ENERGY TAXATI, P320
[2]  
Andersen M. S., 2007, INTRO ENV TAX REFORM, P6
[3]   The Impact and Determinants of Environmental Taxation on Economic Growth Communities in Romania [J].
Andrei, Jean ;
Mieila, Mihai ;
Popescu, Gheorghe H. ;
Nica, Elvira ;
Cristina, Manole .
ENERGIES, 2016, 9 (11)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Policy Brief, July, P1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, IEEP FIN REP NETH MI
[6]   Environmental tax reform: does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence [J].
Bosquet, B .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 34 (01) :19-32
[7]  
Bovenberg A., 1996, J ECON, V163-184, P367, DOI DOI 10.2307/2118443
[8]  
Bovenberg AL, 1997, J PUBLIC ECON, V63, P207
[9]   Greenhouse gas emissions in Norway: do carbon taxes work? [J].
Bruvoll, A ;
Larsen, BM .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (04) :493-505
[10]   Is There Any Evidence on the Existence of an Environmental Taxation Kuznets Curve? The Case of European Countries under Their Rule of Law Enforcement [J].
Castiglione, Concetta ;
Infante, Davide ;
Smirnova, Janna .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (10) :7242-7262