DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER WITH COMPLEXED PSA AND COMPLEXED/TOTAL PSA RATIO - IS THERE ANY ADVANTAGE?

被引:9
|
作者
Strittmatter, F. [1 ]
Stieber, P. [2 ]
Nagel, D. [2 ]
Fuellhase, C. [1 ]
Walther, S. [1 ]
Stief, C. G. [1 ]
Waidelich, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Munich, Dept Urol, Munich, Germany
[2] Hosp Univ Munich, Inst Clin Chem, Munich, Germany
关键词
Prostate cancer; tPSA; cPSA; ratio f/tPSA; ratio c/tPSA; detection of prostate cancer; benign hyperplasia of the prostate; ANTIGEN PSA; BENIGN HYPERPLASIA; EAU GUIDELINES; 4.0; NG/ML; SERUM; MEN; SPECIFICITY; DIFFERENTIATION; ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/2047-783X-16-10-445
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the performance of total PSA (tPSA), the free/total PSA ratio (f/tPSA), complexed PSA (cPSA) and the complexed/total PSA ratio (c/tPSA) in prostate cancer detection. Methods: Frozen sera of 442 patients have been analysed for tPSA, free PSA (fPSA) and cPSA. 131 patients had prostate cancer and 311 patients benign prostatic hyperplasia. Results: Differences in the distribution of the biomarkers were seen as follows: tPSA, cPSA and c/tPSA were significantly higher in the PC group, and f/tPSA was significantly higher in the BPH group. In the tPSA-range of 0-4 ng/ml none of the biomarkers showed a significant difference in the distribution between both groups. In the tPSA-ranges of 0-10 ng/ml, 2-10 ng/ml, 4-10 ng/ml and <10 ng/ml, f/tPSA showed the highest specificity at high sensitivtities, followed by c/tPSA, cPSA, and tPSA, respectively. In tPSA-ranges greater than 10 ng/ml, cPSA offered the best discriminatory ability. CPSA compared to tPSA offered better specificity at high sensitivities in all tPSA-ranges. Conclusion: F/tPSA offers the best ability to distinguish between both groups in lower tPSA-ranges, followed by c/tPSA. CPSA compared to tPSA offers a better ability to discriminate between both groups in all PSA-ranges and could be used as an initial test for PC.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 450
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Total, free, and complexed PSA: Analysis and clinical utility
    Sokoll, LJ
    Chan, DW
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIGAND ASSAY, 1998, 21 (02): : 171 - 179
  • [42] Complexed PSA improves prostate cancer detection: Results from a multicenter Japanese Clinical Trial
    Okihara, K
    Ukimura, O
    Nakamura, T
    Ushijima, S
    Mizutani, Y
    Kawauchi, A
    Naya, Y
    Kojima, M
    Miki, T
    UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (02) : 328 - 332
  • [43] Measurement of complexed PSA in the differential diagnosis between prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia
    Filella, X
    Alcover, J
    Molina, R
    Corral, JM
    Carretero, P
    Ballesta, AM
    PROSTATE, 2000, 42 (03): : 181 - 185
  • [44] Complexed PSA in routine diagnosis
    Oremek, GM
    Sapoutzis, N
    Eden, F
    Jonas, D
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2003, 23 (2A) : 975 - 977
  • [45] Comparison of several combinations of free, complexed, and total PSA in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with urologic symptoms
    Filella, X
    Truan, D
    Alcover, J
    Quintó, L
    Molina, R
    Luque, P
    Coca, F
    Ballesta, AM
    UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (06) : 1100 - 1103
  • [46] Complexed PSA combined with clinical parameters enhances prediction of prostate cancer.
    Cheli, CD
    Thiel, RP
    Horninger, W
    Bartsch, G
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (06) : A98 - A98
  • [48] Complexed prostate specific antigen (PSA) reduces unnecessary prostate biopsies in the 2.6-4.0 ng/mL range of total PSA
    Parsons, JK
    Brawer, MK
    Cheli, CD
    Partin, AW
    Djavan, R
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 94 (01) : 47 - 50
  • [49] International multi-center comparison of complexed PSA (cPSA) with total PSA and percent free PSA.
    Cheli, CD
    Brawer, MK
    Filella, X
    Mitchell, I
    Babaian, RJ
    Miller, C
    Partin, A
    Trock, BJ
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 50 (06) : A79 - A79
  • [50] Correlation between the Complex PSA/total PSA Ratio and the Free PSA/total PSA Ratio, Sensitivity and Specificity of Both Markers for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Perez-Lanzac-Lorca, A.
    Barco-Sanchez, A.
    Romero, E.
    Martinez-Peinado, A.
    Lopez-Elorza, F.
    Sanchez-Sanchez, E.
    Alvarez-Ossorio-Fernandez, J. L.
    Castineiras-Fernandez, J.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2013, 37 (08): : 498 - 503