Clinical importance of the antibiotic regimen in transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: quinolone versus cephalosporin

被引:9
|
作者
Lee, Jung Keun [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Sangchul [1 ,2 ]
Hong, Sung Kyu [1 ,2 ]
Byun, Seok-Soo [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Sang Eun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Urol, 166 Gumi Ro, Songnam 463707, Gyunggi Do, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110799, South Korea
来源
BMC UROLOGY | 2016年 / 16卷
关键词
Antibiotics; Biopsy; Infection; Prostate; Transrectal ultrasound; PROSTATE BIOPSY; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; COMPLICATIONS; INFECTIONS; PREVALENCE; RESISTANCE; STATEMENT; SURGERY; RATES;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-016-0169-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Quinolone is recommended as an antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent infectious complication after transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, but the increased appearance of quinolone-resistant organism has raised concerns about the efficacy of quinolone. The current study was performed to evaluate various clinical factors including antimicrobial regimens associated with infectious complication after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Methods: The medical records of 5215 patients who underwent a multicore transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy between May 2003 and January 2013 at our institution were reviewed. We analyzed clinical variables including prostate-specific antigen, International Prostate Symptom Score, antimicrobial regimen, prostate size, and number of biopsy cores. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of infection-related hospitalization after prostate biopsy were performed. Results: The mean age and median prostate-specific antigen of the entire cohort were 66 years and 6.4 ng/ml, respectively. Twenty-eight (0.54 %) patients developed an infectious complication after prostate biopsy that required hospitalization. Patients who received prophylactic quinolone showed a higher infectious hospitalization rate than patients who received prophylactic third-generation cephalosporin (1.5 vs. 0.3 %; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the International Prostate Symptom Score (odds ratio = 3.18, 95 % confidence interval 1.24-8.13, p = 0.016) and the use of third-generation cephalosporin (odds ratio = 0.21, 95 % confidence interval 0.10-0.44, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of infection-related hospitalization after prostate biopsy. Conclusion: With the emergence of quinolone-resistant microorganisms, third-generation cephalosporin may effectively reduce the risk of infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Severe lower urinary tract symptoms may also be an independent risk factor for infection-related hospitalization after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical importance of the antibiotic regimen in transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: quinolone versus cephalosporin
    Jung Keun Lee
    Sangchul Lee
    Sung Kyu Hong
    Seok-Soo Byun
    Sang Eun Lee
    BMC Urology, 16
  • [2] Clinical Importance of Antibiotic Regimen in Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Single Center Analysis of Nine Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-Seven Cases
    Seo, Young Eun
    Ryu, Hoyoung
    Oh, Jong Jin
    Jeong, Seong Jin
    Hwang, Sung Il
    Lee, Hak Jong
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    Lee, Sangchul
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2018, 19 (07) : 704 - 710
  • [3] Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary?
    Jordi Puig
    Anna Darnell
    Patricia Bermúdez
    Antoni Malet
    Guadalupe Serrate
    Marisa Baré
    Joan Prats
    European Radiology, 2006, 16 : 939 - 943
  • [4] Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy:: is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary?
    Puig, J
    Darnell, A
    Bermúdez, P
    Malet, A
    Serrate, G
    Baré, M
    Prats, J
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (04) : 939 - 943
  • [5] Variability of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy prophylactic measures
    Hillelsohn, Joel H.
    Duty, Brian
    Blute, Michael L., Jr.
    Okhunov, Zhamshid
    Kashan, Mahyar
    Moldwin, Robert
    Ashley, Richard N.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (06) : 6573 - 6577
  • [6] PREVALENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN FECAL FLORA BEFORE TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY AND THE CLINICAL IMPACT OF TARGETED ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS
    Ozgur, Arikan
    Asif, Yildirim
    Gokhan, Atis
    Berrin, Tanidir
    Cenk, Gurbuz
    Bulent, Erol
    Onur, Danacioglu
    Meftun, Culpan
    Haluk, Vahapoglu
    Hulya, Caskurlu
    Turhan, Caskurlu
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2017, 70 (10): : 852 - 858
  • [7] Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy sepsis and the rise in carbapenem antibiotic use
    Leahy, Olivia R.
    O'Reilly, Mary
    Dyer, David R.
    Phillips, David
    Grummet, Jeremy P.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 85 (12) : 931 - 935
  • [8] Randomized controlled trial of antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
    Chan Eddie Shu-yin
    Lo Ka-lun
    Ng Chi-fai
    Hou See-ming
    Yip Sidney Kam-hung
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 125 (14) : 2432 - 2435
  • [9] Antibiotic prophylaxis in ultrasound guided transrectal prostate biopsy
    Sieber, PR
    Rommel, FM
    Agusta, VE
    Breslin, JA
    Huffnagle, HW
    Harpster, LE
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (06) : 2199 - 2200
  • [10] Infection after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
    Lee, Seung-Ju
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 56 (05) : 346 - 350