Design Equations for Concrete Bridge Decks with FRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms

被引:18
作者
Noel, Martin [1 ]
Fam, Amir [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Dept Civil Engn, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Engn & Appl Sci, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
关键词
Punching shear; Deflection; Fiber-reinforced polymers; Stay-in-place formwork; Concrete; Bridge deck; Slabs; Design; Rapid construction;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000681
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Bridge deck construction using stay-in-place (SIP) fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) structural forms has shown promise as an efficient, rapid, and low-waste alternative to conventional methods. Several studies have shown that the load capacity of this system is typically governed by punching shear strength, although no design-oriented equations have yet been developed to predict failure load or deflection at service. In this paper, two simple design equations are proposed for the ultimate load and stiffness of concrete deck slabs with SIP FRP forms, derived from the results of a comprehensive parametric study using a rigorous finite-difference computer model that is readily available. The equations were then validated by using experimental results from a database of 52 tests reported in the literature including FRP SIP forms of several shapes, sizes, surface treatments, spliced connections, boundary conditions, environmental exposures, and loading protocols. The equations showed an average predicted-to-experimental nominal strength of 87% with a standard deviation of 19%. When applying the design code member resistance factor of 0.75 consistent with shear failure of FRP-reinforced decks, a conservative strength was predicted for the entire database. Stiffness, on the other hand, was less accurately predicted; however, the model provided reliable and accurate indication of whether deflection limit is satisfied or not. (C) 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] AASHTO, 2009, AASHTO LRFD BRIDG DE, P53
  • [2] AASHTO, 2007, AASHTO LRFD BRIDG DE, P718
  • [3] Structural behavior of FRP composite bridge deck panels
    Alagusundaramoorthy, P.
    Harik, I. E.
    Choo, C. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2006, 11 (04) : 384 - 393
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1995, BUILDING CODE REQUIR
  • [5] Construction and cost analysis of an FRP reinforced concrete bridge deck
    Berg, Adam C.
    Bank, Lawrence C.
    Oliva, Michael G.
    Russell, Jeffrey S.
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2006, 20 (08) : 515 - 526
  • [6] Durability of Bridge Deck with FRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms under Freeze-Thaw Cycles
    Boles, Raouf
    Nelson, Mark
    Fam, Amir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 19 (04)
  • [7] Canadian Standards Association, 2006, CAN HIGHW BRIDG DES
  • [8] Dieter DA, 2002, TRANSPORT RES REC, P219
  • [9] Durability in a Salt Solution of Pultruded Composite Materials Used in Structural Sections for Bridge Deck Applications
    Fam, Amir
    Boles, Raouf
    Robert, Mathieu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (01)
  • [10] New Bridge Deck Cast onto Corrugated GFRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms with Interlocking Connections
    Fam, Amir
    Nelson, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 16 (01) : 110 - 117