Evaluation of EU air quality standards through modeling and the FAIRMODE benchmarking methodology

被引:25
|
作者
Kushta, Jonilda [1 ]
Georgiou, Georgios K. [1 ]
Proestos, Yiannis [1 ]
Christoudias, Theodoros [2 ]
Thunis, Philippe [3 ]
Savvides, Chrysanthos [4 ]
Papadopoulos, Christos [4 ]
Lelieveld, Jos [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cyprus Inst, EEWRC, 20 Konstantinou Kavafi St, CY-2121 Nicosia, Cyprus
[2] Cyprus Inst, Computat Based Sci & Technol Res Ctr CaSToRC, CY-2121 Nicosia, Cyprus
[3] European Commiss, JRC, Directorate Energy Transport & Climate, Air & Climate Unit, Via E Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
[4] Minist Labour Welf & Social Insurance, Dept Labour Inspect, Nicosia, Cyprus
[5] Max Planck Inst Chem, D-55128 Mainz, Germany
关键词
EU Air Quality Directive; Air pollution; Model evaluation; Cyprus; FAIRMODE; East Mediterranean; PERFORMANCE CRITERIA; PHOTOLYSIS RATES; DESERT DUST; PART I; AEROSOL; SUMMER; CHEMISTRY; POLLUTION; IMPACT; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11869-018-0631-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We evaluate air quality modeling over the East Mediterranean using the benchmarking methodology developed in the framework of the Forum for Air Quality Modelling in Europe (FAIRMODE). FAIRMODE aims to provide a harmonized approach of model evaluation for regulatory purposes. We test the methodology by assessing the performance of the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem) against ground-based air quality observations over Cyprus, a member state of the European Union. Two nested domains are used (at 50- and 10-km horizontal grid spacing) with the comparison performed over the innermost domain. We consider performance indicators reflecting regulations for air quality standards (maximum daily 8-hourly mean ozone, hourly nitrogen dioxide, and daily fine particulate matter concentrations). The WRF-Chem model is found to satisfy the proposed performance objectives regarding ozone and NO2, though it underestimates the latter in urban areas possibly due to uncertainties in emission inventories. Fine particulate matter is well represented by the model, except on days with strong influence from natural sources, highlighting the necessity for fine-tuning dust mobilization and transport in the region. The objectives are fulfilled even though discrepancies exist between model and observations. Our results indicate the need for more stringent performance criteria at relatively low concentrations. Overall, we find that the methodology provides in-depth information and relevant statistical metrics to guide air quality and model assessments for monitoring compliance with the EU Air Quality Directives and other guidelines to limit the impact of air pollution on human health and ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 86
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Impact assessment of river dust on regional air quality through integrated remote sensing and air quality modeling
    Chen, Chien-Yuan
    Chen, Ho Wen
    Sun, Chu-Ting
    Chuang, Yen Hsun
    Nguyen, Kieu Lan Phuong
    Lin, Yu Ting
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 755 (755)
  • [22] TRACE ELEMENTS IN AMBIENT AIR AT PORTO METROPOLITAN AREA-CHECKING FOR COMPLIANCE WITH NEW EUROPEAN UNION (EU) AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
    Pinto, Edgar
    Soares, Carlos
    Couto, Cristina M. C. M.
    Almeida, Agostinho
    JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES, 2015, 78 (13-14): : 848 - 859
  • [23] Measures and Policies for Reducing PM Exceedances through the Use of Air Quality Modeling: The Case of Thessaloniki, Greece
    Progiou, Athena
    Liora, Natalia
    Sebos, Ioannis
    Chatzimichail, Christina
    Melas, Dimitrios
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [24] Air quality modeling for accountability research: Operational, dynamic, and diagnostic evaluation
    Henneman, Lucas R. F.
    Liu, Cong
    Hu, Yongtao
    Mulholland, James A.
    Russell, Armistead G.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 166 : 551 - 565
  • [25] An evaluation of improvements in the air quality of Beijing arising from the use of new vehicle emission standards
    Jin, Taosheng
    Gao, Jiajia
    Fu, Lixin
    Ai, Yi
    Xu, Xiaohong
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2012, 184 (04) : 2151 - 2159
  • [26] Modeling Europe with CAMx for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII)
    Nopmongcol, Uarporn
    Koo, Bonyoung
    Tai, Edward
    Jung, Jaegun
    Piyachaturawat, Piti
    Emery, Chris
    Yarwood, Greg
    Pirovano, Guido
    Mitsakou, Christina
    Kallos, George
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 53 : 177 - 185
  • [27] An updated modeling framework to simulate Los Angeles air quality - Part 1: Model development, evaluation, and source apportionment
    Pennington, Elyse A.
    Wang, Yuan
    Schulze, Benjamin C.
    Seltzer, Karl M.
    Yang, Jiani
    Zhao, Bin
    Jiang, Zhe
    Shi, Hongru
    Venecek, Melissa
    Chau, Daniel
    Murphy, Benjamin N.
    Kenseth, Christopher M.
    Ward, Ryan X.
    Pye, Havala O. T.
    Seinfeld, John H.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2024, 24 (04) : 2345 - 2363
  • [28] High-resolution modeling and evaluation of ozone air quality of Osaka using MM5-CMAQ system
    Shrestha, Kundan Lal
    Kondo, Akira
    Kaga, Akikazu
    Inoue, Yoshio
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2009, 21 (06) : 782 - 789
  • [29] Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1
    Appel, K. Wyat
    Napelenok, Sergey L.
    Foley, Kristen M.
    Pye, Havala O. T.
    Hogrefe, Christian
    Luecken, Deborah J.
    Bash, Jesse O.
    Roselle, Shawn J.
    Pleim, Jonathan E.
    Foroutan, Hosein
    Hutzell, William T.
    Pouliot, George A.
    Sarwar, Golam
    Fahey, Kathleen M.
    Gantt, Brett
    Gilliam, Robert C.
    Heath, Nicholas K.
    Kang, Daiwen
    Mathur, Rohit
    Schwede, Donna B.
    Spero, Tanya L.
    Wong, David C.
    Young, Jeffrey O.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 10 (04) : 1703 - 1732
  • [30] Evaluation of air quality standard compliance by means of statistical distribution modeling: a study in Tehran
    S. Dehhaghi
    Y. Rashidi
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2022, 19 : 12235 - 12248