Foot pressures during gait: A comparison of techniques for reducing pressure points

被引:9
作者
Lawless, MW [1 ]
Reveal, GT [1 ]
Laughlin, RT [1 ]
机构
[1] Wright State Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dayton, OH 45409 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/107110070102200712
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Various methods have been used to redistribute plantar surface foot pressure in patients with foot ulcers. This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of four modalities (fracture walker, fracture walker with insert, and open and closed toe total contact casts) in reducing plantar foot pressure. Methods: Ten healthy, normal volunteer subjects had an F-scan sensor (ultra thin shoe insert pressure monitor) placed under the right foot. They then ambulated on a flat surface, maintaining their normal gait. Dynamic plantar pressures were averaged over 10 steps at four different sites (plantar surface of great toe, first metatarsal head, base of fifth metatarsal, and plantar heel). All subjects repeated this sequence under five different testing conditions (barefoot, with a fracture walker, fracture walker with arch support insert, open and closed toe total contact cast). Each subject's barefoot pressures were then compared with the pressures during the different modalities. Results: All four treatment modalities significantly reduced (p < 0.05) plantar pressure at the first metatarsal head (no method was superior). The fracture walker, fracture walker with insert, and open toe total contact cast significantly reduced pressure at the heel. Pressures at the base of the fifth metatarsal and great toe were not significantly reduced with any treatment form. Conclusion: The fracture walker, with and without arch support, and total contact cast can effectively reduce plantar pressure at the heel and first metatarsal head.
引用
收藏
页码:594 / 597
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Reliability of F-Scan in-shoe measurements of plantar pressure
    Ahroni, JH
    Boyko, EJ
    Forsberg, R
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 19 (10) : 668 - 673
  • [2] Albert S, 1994, J Foot Ankle Surg, V33, P598
  • [3] A comparison study of plantar foot pressure in a standardized shoe, total contact cast, and prefabricated pneumatic walking brace
    Baumhauer, JF
    Wervey, R
    McWilliams, J
    Harris, GF
    Shereff, MJ
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 18 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [4] Brand PW, 1988, The Diabetic Foot, P83
  • [5] BRODSKY J, 1992, SURG FOOT ANKLE, P877
  • [6] Cavanagh P. R., 1985, Biomechanical measurement in orthopaedic practice, P159
  • [7] ULCERATION, UNSTEADINESS, AND UNCERTAINTY - THE BIOMECHANICAL CONSEQUENCES OF DIABETES-MELLITUS
    CAVANAGH, PR
    SIMONEAU, GG
    ULBRECHT, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1993, 26 : 23 - &
  • [8] *CDC, 1996, STUD CIT ORTH KNOWL, V5, P541
  • [9] MULTISTEP MEASUREMENT OF PLANTAR PRESSURE ALTERATIONS USING METATARSAL PADS
    CHANG, AH
    ABUFARAJ, ZU
    HARRIS, GF
    NERY, J
    SHEREFF, MJ
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 15 (12) : 654 - 660
  • [10] Plantar pressure measurements during ambulation in weightbearing conventional short leg casts and total contact casts
    Conti, SF
    Martin, RL
    Chaytor, ER
    Hughes, C
    Luttrell, L
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 17 (08) : 464 - 469