Quality of Life Is to Experience Adult Social Status

被引:3
作者
Carlsson, Oie Umb [1 ,2 ]
Adolfsson, Paivi [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Disabil & Habilitat, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Res & Dev Sormland, Eskilstuna, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Disabil Res, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
focus group; ID; participatory approach; quality of life; CONDUCTING FOCUS GROUPS; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES; SELF-DETERMINATION; LEARNING-DISABILITIES; PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; PEOPLE; INDIVIDUALS; ISSUES; CHOICE; FIELD;
D O I
10.1111/jppi.12282
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Quality of life (QoL) has become an important outcome in evaluations of services and support for people with intellectual disabilities (ID). Many people with ID request more say and want to be involved in the development of services and support provision. The original Uppsala QoL (UQoL) model consists of a general essence and hierarchically ordered themes and describes QoL from the perspective of people with ID through individual interviews. The aim of the present study is to examine the UQoL regarding its inherent component parts and to explore the interrelationship between them. The study contributes to the understanding of the concept of QoL from the perspective of people with ID. Focus group interviews were conducted with people with mild and moderate ID. The results indicate that QoL is to experience well-being. The key component of QoL is to experience adult social status. which is determined by whether the individual experiences having control of their life, experiences a sense of personal safety and feels social belonging. In concordance with the original model, the UQoL2 is mainly made up of components equivalent to those frequently reported in the QoL literature. Nevertheless, some differences require attention. The primary component, adult social status, has not previously been highlighted in the QoL literature. The point of departure in the UQoL model is the users ' perspective rather than the user perspective as perceived by professionals or researchers. The UQoL is not primarily linked to the quality of service provision, but to peoples' daily life. A revised version of the original UQoL is suggested. Unlike the original model, other than the fact which that adult social status is superior, the components are not hierarchically organized, rather the interrelation between them is emphasized.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 283
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1993, QUALITY LIFE
  • [2] Choices for People With Intellectual Disabilities: Official Discourse and Everyday Practice
    Antaki, Charles
    Finlay, W. M. L.
    Walton, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2009, 6 (04) : 260 - 266
  • [3] Autonomy in everyday life, for whom?
    Barron, K
    [J]. DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2001, 16 (03) : 431 - 447
  • [4] Beresford P., 2013, Nordic Social Work Research, V3, P139, DOI DOI 10.1080/2156857X.2013.835138
  • [5] Beyea S C, 2000, AORN J, V71, P897, DOI 10.1016/S0001-2092(06)62276-X
  • [6] A Collaborative Group Method of Inclusive Research
    Bigby, Christine
    Frawley, Patsie
    Ramcharan, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 27 (01) : 54 - 64
  • [7] Metacognition: towards a new approach to quality of life
    Blanc, Julien
    Boyer, Laurent
    Le Coz, Pierre
    Auquier, Pascal
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (02) : 467 - 475
  • [8] Choice as an Aspect of Quality of Life for People With Intellectual Disabilities
    Brown, Ivan
    Brown, Roy I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2009, 6 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [9] The application of quality of life
    Brown, RI
    Brown, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2005, 49 : 718 - 727
  • [10] Models of Disability, Quality of Life, and Individualized Supports: Implications for Professional Practice in Intellectual Disability
    Buntinx, Wil H. E.
    Schalock, Robert L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2010, 7 (04) : 283 - 294